Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:39:07.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Expected Utility Theory of International Conflict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Bruce Bueno de Mesquita*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester

Abstract

An expected utility theory of necessary, but not sufficient, conditions for the initiation and escalation of serious international conflicts, including war, is proposed. The theory leads to the seemingly obvious generalization that actors do not initiate wars—or serious disputes—if they do not expect to gain from doing so. Underlying that generalization are a number of counterintuitive deductions. For instance, I show that though a weak nonaligned state cannot rationally attack a stronger nonaligned nation, it might be able to attack a stronger adversary that, in addition to its own strength, expects to derive support from allies. I also show that serious conflict is more likely between very close allies than between enemies. Systematic tests, using data on serious international threats, military interventions, and interstate wars, as well as 17 cases of known attempts at deterrence, show very substantial support for the expected utility propositions deduced from the theory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altfeld, M. (1979). “The Reactions of Third States Toward Wars.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Altfeld, M., and de Mesquita, B. Bueno (1979). “Choosing Sides in Wars.” International Studies Quarterly 23:87112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, K. (1960). Conflict and Defense. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B. (1975). “Measuring Systemic Polarity.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 19: 187216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B. (1978). “Systemic Polarization and the Occurrence and Duration of War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 22: 241–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B. (1981). The War Trap. New Haven: Yale University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Distance Between Ports (1965). Washington, D.C.: United States Naval Oceanographic Office.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Gochman, C. (1975). “Status, Conflict, and War: The Major Powers, 1820–1970.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Midlarsky, M. (1975). On War: Political Violence in the International System. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Official Airline Guide: Worldwide Edition (1978). New York: Reuben H. Donnelly Corporation.Google Scholar
Organski, A. F. K., and Kugler, J. (1980). The War Ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, C., and Aldrich, J. (1978). “The Relationship Between Size and Stability in the Major Power International System.” American Journal of Political Science 22: 743–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, B. (1963). “The Calculus of Deterrence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 7: 97109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. D., Bremer, S. and Stuckey, J. (1972). “Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965.” In Russett, B. (ed.), Peace, War, and Numbers. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D., and Small, M. (1968). “Alliance Aggregation and the Onset of War, 1815–1945.” In Singer, J. D. (ed.), Quantitative International Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D., and Small, M. (1972). The Wages of War. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Thucydides, (1959). The Peloponnesian War. Translated by Hobbes, T.. Edited by Grene, D.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Zinnes, D., North, R. and Koch, H. Jr. (1961). “Capability, Threat, and the Outbreak of War.” In Rosenau, J. (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy: A Reader in Research and Theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.