Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:47:48.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alienation and Justice in the Market*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Arthur DiQuattro
Arthur DiQuattro*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article elucidates and critically evaluates the Marxian ideas of justice and alienation by distinguishing between the class structure of capitalism and the use of the market as a mode of allocation. The argument is that the social relations of production, not the market mechanism, are primarily responsible for exploitation and alienated labor under capitalism. It follows from this that both the labor theory of value and the marginal theory of productivity, as theories of the market, are consistent with the Marxian theory of exploitation. An additional implication is that market socialism, the use of market arrangements against the background of socialist productive relations, is not only compatible with, but required by, the values that define a socialist society.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , September 1978 , pp. 871 - 887
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This is a revised version of a paper presented at the 1976 APSA meetings, Chicago, Illinois. An earlier draft was also presented to the Colloquium in Social Theory, a part of the Social Theory Program at the University of Washington. I am indebted to the discussion of colloquium participants, as well as for helpful comments offered by anonymous reviewers of the American Political Science Review. Thanks also to V. V. Svacek, University of Toronto, whose antagonism to the idea of the market prompted my interest in writing this paper.

References

Bell, Daniel (1960). “Work and Its Discontents: The Cult of Efficiency in America.” In Bell, Daniel, The End of Ideology. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Blumberg, Paul (1968). Industrial Democracy: The Sociology of Participation. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel and Gintis, Herbert (1975). “Class Power and Alienated Labor.” Monthly Review 26, No. 3: 9–25.Google Scholar
Braverman, Harry (1974). Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobb, Maurice (1960). Political Economy and Capitalism, Rev. ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Dobb, Maurice (1947). Studies in the Development of Capitalism. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich (1967). “Articles from the Labour Standard.” In Henderson, W. O. (ed.), Engels: Selected Writings. Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich (1947). Herr Eugen Duhring's Revolution in Science. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gintis, Herbert (1972). “Alienation and Power.” Review of Radical Political Economics 4, No. 5: 1–34.Google Scholar
Gordon, Scott (1968). “Why Does Marxian Exploitation Theory Require a Labor Theory of Value?” Journal of Political Economy 76:137–40.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Edward (1975). “The Consequences of Worker Participation: A Clarification of the Theoretical Literature.” Social Science Quarterly 56:191–209.Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin and Nell, Edward (1975). Rational Economic Man: A Philosophical Critique of Neoclassical Economics. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horvat, Branko (1964). Towards a Theory of Planned Economy. Belgrade: Yugoslav Institute of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. K. and Schwartz, Jesse, eds. (1972). A Critique of Economic Theory. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. K. and Schwartz, Jesse and Sherman, Howard (1972). “Value, Alienation, and Distribution.” Science and Society 36:29–48.Google Scholar
Jenkins, David (1974). Job Power: Blue and White Collar Democracy. Baltimore: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lange, Oskar and Taylor, Fred M. (1938). On the Economie Theory of Socialism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lange, Oskar and Taylor, Fred M. (1968). “Marxian Economics and Modem Economic Theory.” In Horowitz, David, ed., Marx and Modem Economics. New York: Modem Reader Paperbacks, pp. 68–87.Google Scholar
Lebowitz, Michael A. (1974). “The Current Crisis of Economic Theory.” Science and Society 37:385–403.Google Scholar
Leontiev, A. (n.d.). Political Economy. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Macpherson, Crawford Brough (1962). The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, Ernest (1968). Marxist Economic Theory, 2 Vols. New York: Monthly Review.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert (1970). Five Lectures. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Marglin, Stephen (1974). “What Do Bosses Do?” Review of Radical Political Economics 6, No. 2:33–60.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1906). Capital, 3 Vols. Chicago: Kerr.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1955). Critique of the Gotha Programme. In Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, Selected Works, 2 Vols. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1971). Theories of Surplus Value, 3 Vols. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich (1964a). The German Ideology. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1964b). Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1904). A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Chicago: Kerr.Google Scholar
Mayer, Kurt and Buckley, Walter (1970). Class and Society, 3rd ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Meade, James E. (1965). Efficiency, Equality and the Ownership of Property. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1864). Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 1, 5th ed. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Nell, Edward (1972a). “Property and the Means of Production: A Primer on the Cambridge Controversy.” Review of Radical Political Economics 4, No. 2: 1–27. Reprinted in Warner Modular Publication, No. 511, 1973.Google Scholar
Nell, Edward (1972b). “The Revival of Political Economy.” Social Research 39, No. 1: 32–52.Google Scholar
O'Connor, James (1976). “A Note on Independent Commodity Production.” Monthly Review 28, No. 1:60–63.Google Scholar
Okun, Arthur (1975). Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.Google Scholar
Ollman, Bertell (1971). Alienation: Marx's Conception of Man in Capitalist Society. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles (1972). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah (1972). Wittgenstein and Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1966). Distributive Justice: A Constructive Critique of the Utilitarian Theory of Distribution. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan (1966). An Essay on Marxian Economics. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan (1962). Economic Philosophy. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan and Eatwell, John (1973). An Introduction to Modern Economics. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Frank (1969). “Market Socialism: A Humane Economy?” Journal of Economic Issues 3, No. 4: 3–20.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul (1964). Economics: An Introductory Analysis. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Selucky, R. (1975). “Marxism and Self-Management.” In Vanek, Jaroslav (ed.), Self-Management: Economic Liberation of Man. Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sherman, Howard (1972). Radical Political Economy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam (1910). The Wealth of Nations, Vol. 1. London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
Sweezy, Paul (1942). The Theory of Capitalist Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tautsky, Curt (1970). Work Organizations: Major Theoretical Perspectives. Itasca, Ill.: Peacock.Google Scholar
Tawney, R. H. (1920). The Acquisitive Society. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Howe.Google Scholar
Tawney, R. H. (1950). Religion and the Rise of Capitalism. 3rd ed. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare (1973). Work in America. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Urmson, J. O. (1958). “Saints and Heroes.” In Melden, A. I. (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosophy. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Van De Veer, Donald (1973). “Marx's View of Justice.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 33:366–86.Google Scholar
Vanek, Jaroslav (1975). Self-Management: Economic Liberation of Man. Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
Vickrey, W. S. (1964). Microstatistics. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Vickrey, W. S. (1973). “An Exchange of Questions between Economics and Philosophy.” In Pehlps, Edmund S. (ed.), Economic Justice. Baltimore: Penguin, pp. 35–62.Google Scholar
Weinstein, James (1968). The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Wood, Allan W. (1972). “The Marxian Critique of Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, No. 3:244–82.Google Scholar
Zimbalist, Andrew (1975). “The Limits of Work Humanization.” Review of Radical Political Economics 7, No. 2: 50–59.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.