Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:42:50.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agency Problems in Political Campaigns: Media Buying and Consulting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2017

GREGORY J. MARTIN  and
ZACHARY PESKOWITZ
GREGORY J. MARTIN*
Affiliation:
Emory University
ZACHARY PESKOWITZ*
Affiliation:
Emory University
*
Gregory J. Martin is an Assistant Professor, Emory University, 1555 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322 ([email protected]).
Zachary Peskowitz is an Assistant Professor, Emory University, 1555 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Advertising expenditures in congressional campaigns are made not directly by campaigns themselves but indirectly though intermediary firms. Using a new dataset of revenues and costs of these firms, we study the markups that these firms charge candidates. We find that markups are higher for inexperienced candidates relative to experienced candidates, and PACs relative to candidates. We also find significant differences across the major parties: firms working for Republicans charge higher prices, exert less effort, and induce less responsiveness in their clients’ advertising expenditures to electoral circumstances than do their Democratic counterparts. We connect this observation to the distribution of ideology among individual consulting firm employees, arguing that these higher rents incentivize consultants to work against their intrinsic ideological motivations. The internal organization of firms reflects an attempt to mitigate this conflict of interest; firms are composed of ideologically homogeneous employees, and are more likely to work for ideologically proximate clients.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 112 , Issue 2 , May 2018 , pp. 231 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We received valuable comments from seminar audiences at Caltech, Stanford GSB, Emory, the University of Houston Political Economy Conference, and MPSA. We thank Tom Clark for his advice and guidance on this project and Sean Cain and Brian Richter for helpful discussant comments.

References

REFERENCES

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Iyengar, Shanto, Simon, Adam, and Valentino, Nicholas. 1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?” American Political Science Review 88 (4): 829–38.Google Scholar
Ball, Molly. 2016. “There’s Nothing Better Than a Scared, Rich Candidate: How Political Consulting Works – Or Doesn’t.” The Atlantic (). issn: .Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (3): 571–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Ghatak, Maitreesh. 2005. “Competition and Incentives with Motivated Agents.” American Economic Review 95 (3): 616–36.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2013. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections. http://data.stanford.edu/dime, accessed December 14, 2015.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 367–86.Google Scholar
Cain, Sean A. 2011. “An Elite Theory of Political Consulting and Its Implications for U.S. House Election Competition.” Political Behavior 33 (3): 375–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas. 2013. White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics. 2016. http://www.opensecrets.org/resources/create/data.php, accessed December 5, 2016.Google Scholar
Coleman, John J., and Manna, Paul F.. 2000. “Congressional Campaign Spending and the Quality of Democracy.” Journal of Politics 62 (3): 757–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulio, David A. 2004. For Better or Worse? How Political Consultants are Changing Elections in the United States. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Enos, Ryan D., and Hersh, Eitan D.. 2015. “Party Activists as Campaign Advertisers: The Ground Campaign as a Principal-Agent Problem.” American Political Science Review 109 (2): 252–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, David M. 1998. “Political Consultancy Overseas: The Internationalization of Campaign Consultancy.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (2): 171–6.Google Scholar
Franz, Michael M., Fowler, Erika Franklin, and Ridout, Travis N.. 2016. “Loose Cannons or Loyal Foot Soldiers? Toward a More Complex Theory of Interest Group Advertising Strategies.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (3): 738–51.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Gimpel, James G., Green, Donald P., and Shaw, Daron R.. 2011. “How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 135–50.Google Scholar
Green, Donald Philip, and Krasno, Jonathan S.. 1988. “Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (4): 884–907.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Matt. 2009. “Campaigning as an Industry: Consulting Business Models and Intra-Party Competition.” Business and Politics 11 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S. 1992. “Campaign Professionalism and Fundraising in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 54 (3): 859–70.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Alexander V., and Montagnes, B. Pablo. 2015. “The Lobbyist’s Dilemma: Gatekeeping and the Profit Motive.” Working paper, California Institute of Technology, http://people.hss.caltech.edu/~avhirsch/HirschMon-LobbyistsDilemma-Wallis.pdf.Google Scholar
Huber, Gregory A., and Arceneaux, Kevin. 2007. “Identifying the Persuasive Effects of Presidential Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 957–77.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1978. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 72 (2): 469–91.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dennis W. 2012. “Formative Years of Political Consulting in America, 1934-2000.” Journal of Political Marketing 11 (1-2): 54–74.Google Scholar
Kang, Karam, and You, Hye Young. 2015. “Lobbyists as Matchmakers in the Market for Access.” Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a61f/6ccf46960257864369cb26ea287707b79071.pdf.Google Scholar
Koger, Gregory, Masket, Seth, and Noel, Hans. 2009. “Partisan Webs: Information Exchange and Party Networks.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 633–54.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Robin, and Dulio, David A.. 2003. “Political Party Adaptation in U.S. Congressional Campaigns: Why Political Parties Use Coordinated Expenditures to Hire Political Consultants.” Party Politics 9 (6): 729–46.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Robin, and Logan, Angela. 1998. “Political Consultants and the Extension of Party Goals.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (2): 155–9.Google Scholar
Krishna, Vijay, and Morgan, John. 2001. “A Model of Expertise.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2): 747–75.Google Scholar
Lovett, Mitchell, and Peress, Michael. 2015. “Targeting Political Advertising on Television.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10 (3): 391–432.Google Scholar
Mann, Christopher B., and Klofstad, Casey A.. 2015. “The Role of Call Quality in Voter Mobilization: Implications for Electoral Outcomes and Experimental Design.” Political Behavior 37 (1): 135–54.Google Scholar
Martin, Gregory J., and Peskowitz, Zachary. 2015. “Parties and Electoral Performance in the Market for Political Consultants.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40 (3): 441–70.Google Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Cook, James M.. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–44.Google Scholar
Medvic, Stephen K. 2001. Political Consultants in U.S. Congressional Elections. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Medvic, Stephen K. 2006. “Understanding Campaign Strategy: ‘Deliberate Priming’ and the Role of Professional Political Consultants.” Journal of Political Marketing 5 (1-2): 11–32.Google Scholar
Medvic, Stephen K., and Lenart, Silvo. 1997. “The Influence of Political Consultants in the 1992 Congressional Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22 (1): 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan, and Montgomery, Jacob M.. 2015. “Connecting the Candidates: Consultant Networks and the Diffusion of Campaign Strategy in American Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (2): 292–308.Google Scholar
Plasser, Fritz. 2000. “American Campaign Techniques Worldwide.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 5 (4): 33–54.Google Scholar
Seelye, Katharine Q. December 6, 2004. “How to Sell a Candidate to a Porsche-Driving, Leno-Loving Nascar Fan.” The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/06/politics/how-to-sell-a-candidate-to-a-porschedriving-lenoloving-nascar-fan.html?_r=0, accessed May 14, 2016.Google Scholar
Sheingate, Adam. 2016. Building a Business of Politics: The Rise of Political Consulting and the Transformation of American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Richard, Masket, Seth, and Dulio, David. 2013. “527 Committees, Formal Parties, and Party Adaptation.” The Forum 11 (2): 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, Jennifer A. 2006. Self-Financed Candidates in Congressional Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulkin, Tracy. 2011. The Legislative Legacy of Congressional Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Martin and Peskowitz supplementary material

Martin and Peskowitz supplementary material 1

Download Martin and Peskowitz supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 188.9 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Martin and Peskowitz Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XEXISR
Link
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.