Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:04:38.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Voting and Vetoing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Eyal Winter*
Affiliation:
Washington University and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Abstract

The consequences of veto power in committees is analyzed using the approach of noncooperative bargaining theory. It is first shown that in equilibrium nonveto players do not share in the benefits gained by the decision making of the committee, that is, in every equilibrium outcome of the bargaining game, nonveto players earn zero. Some measures for reducing the excessive power of veto members in committees are analyzed. Specifically, I study the effects of imposing a deadline on negotiations and of expanding the committee by increasing the number of nonveto players. Quantitative results are given for the case of the UN Security Council.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Affuso, P. J., Brams, Steven J., and Kilgour, D. M.. 1989. “Presidential Power: A Game Theoretic Analysis.” In The Presidency in American Politics, ed. Brace, Paul and others. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, Sydney D. 1969. Voting in the Security Council. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, David P. 1989. “A Non-Cooperative Theory of Legislative Coalitions.” American Journal of Political Science 33(2):1048–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, David P., and Ferejohn, John A.. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 83(4):1181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brams, Steven J. 1986. Game Theory and Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J., Doherty, A. E., and Weidner, M. L.. 1994. “Game Theory: Focusing on Players Decisions and Agreements.” In International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity, ed. Zartman, William I.. New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Diermeier, D., and Myerson, Roger B.. 1994. “Bargaining, Veto Power and Legislative Committees.” Northwestern University, The Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science. Typescript.Google Scholar
Fershtman, Chaim, and Seidmann, Daniel J.. 1993. “Deadline Effects and Inefficient Delay in Bargaining with Endogenous Commitment.” Journal of Economic Theory 60(2):306–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Joe E. 1990. “The Power of the Proposal Maker in a Model of Endogenous Agenda Formation.” Public Choice 64(1):120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, N. M., and Poole, K. T.. 1995. “Veto Power and Legislation: An Empirical Analysis of Executive and Legislative Bargaining from 1961 to 1986.” Journal of Law Economics and Organization 11(2): 282312.Google Scholar
Moldovanu, Benny, and Winter, Eyal. 1995. “Order Independent Equilibria.” Games and Economic Behavior 9(l):2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Motty, and Reny, Phil J.. 1994. “A Non-Cooperative View of Coalition Formation and the Core.” Econometrica 62(4):795818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1973. An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Russell, Ruth B., and Muther, Jeanette E.. 1958. A History of the United Nations Charter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Seidmann, Daniel J. 1989. “Inefficiency and Renegotiation in Multilateral Bargaining.” Working Paper 2189, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Serrano, Roberto. 1992. “Non-Cooperative Implementation of the Core.” Working Paper 92–25, Brown University.Google Scholar
Sutton, John. 1986. “Non-Cooperative Bargaining Theory—An Introduction.” Review of Economic Studies 76(4):709–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Damme, Eric, Selten, Reinhard, and Winter, Eyal. 1990. “Alternating Bid Bargaining with a Smallest Money Unit.” Games and Economic Behavior 2(2):188201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.