Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:41:07.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Violence and Voting in the United States: How School Shootings Affect Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2021

LAURA GARCÍA-MONTOYA Open the ORCID record for LAURA GARCÍA-MONTOYA [Opens in a new window] ,
ANA ARJONA Open the ORCID record for ANA ARJONA [Opens in a new window]  and
MATTHEW LACOMBE Open the ORCID record for MATTHEW LACOMBE [Opens in a new window]
LAURA GARCÍA-MONTOYA*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, United States
ANA ARJONA*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, United States
MATTHEW LACOMBE*
Affiliation:
Barnard College, Columbia University, United States
*
Laura García-Montoya, Visiting Fellow, Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, United States, [email protected].
Ana Arjona, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Northwestern University, United States, [email protected].
Matthew Lacombe, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Barnard College, Columbia University, United States, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do citizens change their voting decisions after their communities experience catastrophic violent events? The literature on the behavioral effects of violence, on the one hand, and on political behavior, on the other, suggest different answers to this question. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we investigate the influence of indiscriminate, rampage-style school shootings on both voter turnout levels and the relative electoral support for the Democratic and Republican Parties at the county level in US presidential elections (1980–2016). We find that although voter turnout does not change, the vote share of the Democratic Party increases by an average of nearly 5 percentage points in counties that experienced shootings—a remarkable shift in an age of partisan polarization and close presidential elections. These results show that school shootings do have important electoral consequences and bring to the fore the need to further examine the effects of different forms of violence on political behavior.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 116 , Issue 3 , August 2022 , pp. 807 - 826
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, Robinson, James A., and Santos, Rafael J. 2013. “The Monopoly of Violence: Evidence from Colombia.” Journal of the European Economic Association 11 (s1): 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2012. “Blind Retrospection: Why Shark Attacks Are Bad for Democracy.” Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, Vanderbilt University. Working Paper. https://www.vanderbilt.edu/csdi/research/CSDI_WP_05-2013.pdf.Google Scholar
Albertson, Bethany, and Gadarian, Shana Kushner. 2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrew, Healy, and Malhotra, Neil. 2013. “Retrospective Voting Reconsidered.” Annual Review of Political Science 16: 285–306.Google Scholar
Arjona, Ana. 2021. “The Effects of Violence on Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Research Agenda.” UNDP LAC Working Paper Series, March.Google Scholar
Arjona, Ana, Chacon, Mario, and Garcia-Montoya, Laura. 2019. “The Impact of Political Killings on Democracy: Evidence from Colombia.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Maestas, Cherie D.. 2012. Catastrophic Politics: How Extraordinary Events Redefine Perceptions of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, Perry Jr. 2019. “GOP Politicians Are Much More Resistant to Gun Control Than GOP Voters Are.” FiveThirtyEight, August 6. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/gop-politicians-are-much-more-resistant-to-gun-control-than-gop-voters/.Google Scholar
Bali, Valentina A. 2007. “Terror and Elections: Lessons from Spain.” Electoral Studies 26 (3): 669–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, David J., and Schaffner, Brian F.. 2019. “Reexamining the Effect of Mass Shootings on Public Support for Gun Control.” British Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 1555–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Regina. 2012. “Crime Victimization and Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 106 (3): 570–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Michal, Blattman, Christopher, Chytilová, Julie, Henrich, Joseph, Miguel, Edward, and Mitts, Tamar. 2016. “Can War Foster Cooperation?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (3): 249–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishin, Benjamin G. 2009. Tyranny of the Minority: The Subconstituency Politics Theory of Representation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bjelopera, Jerome P, Bagalman, Erin, Caldwell, Sarah W., Finklea, Kristin M., and McCallion, Gail. 2013. “Public Mass Shootings in the United States: Selected Implications for Federal Public Health and Safety Policy.” Congressional Research Service Report R43004.Google Scholar
Bolsen, Toby, Druckman, James N., and Cook, Fay Lomax. 2013. “The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion.” Political Behavior 36 (2): 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bump, Philip. 2016. “The Decline and Fall of Split-Ticket Voting, Visualized.” Washington Post, May 20. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/05/20/the-striking-evaporation-of-split-ticket-voting/?utmterm=.200c5b5ff99c.Google Scholar
Busby, Ethan C., and Druckman, James N.. 2018. “Football and Public Opinion: A Partial Replication and Extension.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 5 (1): 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busby, Ethan C., Druckman, James N., and Fredendall, Alexandria. 2017. “The Political Relevance of Irrelevant Events.” Journal of Politics 79 (1): 346–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, Brantly, and Pedro, H. C. Sant’Anna. 2020. “Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods.” Journal of Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001.Google Scholar
Conley, Timothy, and Taber, Christopher R.. 2011. “Inference with ‘Difference in Differences’ with a Small Number of Policy Changes.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (1): 113–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Córdova, Abby. 2019. “Living in Gang-Controlled Neighborhoods: Impacts on Electoral and Nonelectoral Participation in El Salvador.” Latin American Research Review 54 (1): 201–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Chaisemartin, Clément, and D’Haultfœuille, Xavier. 2020. “Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects.” American Economic Review 110 (9): 2964–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Lupia, Arthur. 2000. “Preference Formation.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik, and Slothuus, Rune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsass, H. Jaymi, Schildkraut, Jaclyn, and Stafford, Mark C.. 2016. “Studying School Shootings: Challenges and Considerations for Research.” American Journal of Criminal Justice 41 (3): 444–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsass, H. Jaymi, Schlidkraut, Jaclyn, and Stafford, Mark C.. 2014. “Breaking News of Social Problems: Examining Media Consumption and Student Beliefs about School Shootings.” Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society 15 (2): 31–42.Google Scholar
Ferman, Bruno, and Pinto, Cristine. 2019. “Inference in Differences-in-Differences with Few Treated Groups and Heteroskedasticity.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 101 (3): 452–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Anthony, and Hall, Andrew B.. 2018. “Do Shark Attacks Influence Presidential Elections? Reassessing a Prominent Finding on Voter Competence.” Journal of Politics 80 (4): 1423–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailmard, Sean, and Patty, John W.. 2019. “Preventing Prevention.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (2): 342–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Jorge. 2018. “Civil Conflict and Voting Behavior: Evidence from Colombia.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 35 (6): 601–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Montoya, Laura, Arjona, Ana, and Lacombe, Matthew. 2021. “Replication Data for: Violence and Voting in the United States: How School Shootings Affect Elections.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5TBFXL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Sánchez, Miguel. 2010. “Violent Contexts, Electoral Participation and Vote Choices in Colombia: A Hierarchical Approach.” Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Getmansky, Anna, and Zeitzoff, Thomas. 2014. “Terrorism and Voting: The Effect of Rocket Threat on Voting in Israeli Elections.” American Political Science Review 108 (3): 588–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman-Bacon, Andrew. 2021. “Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing.” Journal of Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goss, Kristin A. 2006. Disarmed: The Missing Movement for Gun Control in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2004. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Joslyn, Mark R.. 2001. “Gun Policy, Opinion, Tragedy, and Blame Attribution: The Conditional Influence of Issue Frames.” Journal of Politics 63 (2): 520–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, Hans, Holbein, John, and Baldwin, Matthew. 2020. “Mobilize for Our Lives? School Shootings and Democratic Accountability in U.S. Elections.” American Political Science Review 114 (4): 1375–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew J., Malhotra, Neil, and Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung. 2010. “Irrelevant Events Affect Voters’ Evaluations of Government Performance.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (29): 12804–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, Andrew, and Malhotra, Neil. 2009. “Myopic Voters and Natural Disaster Policy.” American Political Science Review 103 (3): 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersh, Eitan D. 2013. “Long-Term Effect of September 11 on the Political Behavior of Victims’ Families and Neighbors.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (52): 20959–963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heß, Simon. 2017. “Randomization Inference with Stata: A Guide and Software.” The Stata Journal 7 (3): 630–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch-Hoefler, Sivan, Canetti, Daphna, Rapaport, Carmit, and Hobfoll, Stevan E.. 2016. “Conflict Will Harden Your Heart: Exposure to Violence, Psychological Distress, and Peace Barriers in Israel and Palestine.” British Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 845–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobfoll, Stevan E., Canetti-Nisim, Daphna, and Johnson, Robert J.. 2006. “Exposure to Terrorism, Stress-Related Mental Health Symptoms, and Defensive Coping among Jews and Arabs in Israel.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 74 (2): 207–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, Daniel J. 2018. The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2015. “It’s Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in US House Elections.” Journal of Politics 77 (3): 861–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang, S. Mo. 2019. “Mass Shootings Backfire: The Boomerang Effects of Death Concerns on Policy Attitudes.” Media Psychology 22 (2): 298–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joslyn, Mark R., and Haider-Markel, Donald P.. 2013. “The Politics of Causes: Mass Shootings and the Cases of the Virginia Tech and Tucson Tragedies.” Social Science Quarterly 94 (2): 410–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joslyn, Mark R., and Haider-Markel, Donald P.. 2018. “The Direct and Moderating Effects of Mass Shooting Anxiety on Political and Policy Attitudes.” Research Politics 5 (3): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joslyn, Mark R., Haider-Markel, Donald, Baggs, Michael, and Bilbo, Andrew. 2017. “Emerging Political Identities? Gun Ownership and Voting in Presidential Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 98 (2): 382–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantack, Benjamin R., and Paschall, Collin E.. 2020. “Does ‘Politicizing’ Gun Violence Increase Support for Gun Control? Experimental Evidence from the Las Vegas Shooting.” Social Science Quarterly 101 (2): 893–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karol, David. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karol, David, and Miguel, Edward. 2007. “The Electoral Cost of War: Iraq Casualties and the 2004 US Presidential Election.” Journal of Politics 69 (3): 633–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, Michael S. 2008. “Profiling School Shooters and Shooters’ Schools: The Cultural Contexts of Aggrieved Entitlement and Restorative Masculinity.” In There is a Gunman on Campus: Tragedy and Terror at Virginia Tech, eds. Agger, Ben and Luke, Timothy W., 65–78. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael S., and Mahler, Matthew. 2003. “Adolescent Masculinity, Homophobia, and Violence: Random School Shootings, 1982-2001.” American Behavioral Scientist 46 (10): 1439–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L., and Reeves, Andrew. 2012. “The Influence of Federal Spending on Presidential Elections.” American Political Science Review 106 (2): 348–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L., and Reeves, Andrew. 2015. The Particularistic President: Executive Branch Politics and Political Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacombe, Matthew J. 2019. “The Political Weaponization of Gun Owners: The NRA’s Cultivation, Dissemination, and Use of a Group Social Identity.” Journal of Politics. 81 (4): 1342–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacombe, Matthew J., Howat, Adam J., and Rothschild, Jacob E.. 2019. “Gun Ownership as a Social Identity: Estimating Behavioral and Attitudinal Relationships.” Social Science Quarterly 100 (6): 2408–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkin, Ralph W. 2009. “The Columbine Legacy: Rampage Shootings As Political Acts.” American Behavioral Scientist 52 (9): 1309–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeper, Thomas J., and Slothuus, Run. 2014. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation.” Political Psychology 35 (S1): 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leip, Dave. 2016. Dave Leip U.S. Presidential General County Election Results [computer file]. Version 6. Harvard Dataverse [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/SUCQ52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, Sandra. 2018. “To Vote or Not to Vote: How Criminal Violence Shapes Electoral Participation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 62 (9): 1963–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. “Macropartisanship.” The American Political Science Review 83 (4): 1125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madfis, E. 2014. The Risk of School Rampage: Assessing and Preventing Threats of School Violence. New York: Palgrave pivot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madfis, Eric. 2017. “In Search of Meaning: Are School Rampage Shootings Random and Senseless Violence?” The Journal of Psychology 151 (1): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malhotra, Neil. 2008. “Partisan Polarization and Blame Attribution in a Federal System: The Case of Hurricane Katrina.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 38 (4): 651–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, Neil, and Kuo, Alexander G.. 2008. “Attributing Blame: The Public’s Response to Hurricane Katrina.” The Journal of Politics 70 (1): 120–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, Mary Fran T. 2010. “Does Dirty Harry Have the Answer? Citizen Support for the Rule of Law in Central America.” Public Integrity 13 (1): 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGee, James P., and DeBernardo, Caren R.. 1999. “The Classroom Avenger: A Behavioral Profile of School Based Shootings.” The Forensic Examiner 8 (5&6): 16–8.Google Scholar
Montalvo, Jose G. 2011. “Voting after the Bombings: A Natural Experiment on the Effect of Terrorist Attacks on Democratic Elections.” Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (4): 1146–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muschert, Glenn W. 2007. “Research in School Shootings.” Sociology Compass 1 (1): 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Benjamin J., and Hartman, Todd K.. 2017. “Mass Shootings and Public Support for Gun Control.” British Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 1527–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Katherine, and Fox, Cybelle. 2009. “Repeat Tragedy: Rampage Shootings in American High School and College Settings, 2002-2008.” American Behavioral Scientist 52 (9): 1286–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Katherine S., Fox, Cybelle, Harding, David, Mehta, Jal, and Roth, Wendy. 2004. Rampage: The Social Roots of School Shootings. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin, and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2010. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Paolini, Allison. 2015. School Shootings and Student Mental Health: Role of the School Counselor in Mitigating Violence. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.Google Scholar
Parás, Pablo, Coleman, Ken, and Seligson, Mitchell A.. 2006. “The Political Culture of Democracy in Mexico: 2006.” Latin American Public Opinion Project. http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/mexico/2006-politicalculture.pdf.Google Scholar
Pearson-Merkowitz, Shanna, and Dyck, Joshua J.. 2017. “Crime and Partisanship: How Party ID Muddles Reality, Perception, and Policy Attitudes on Crime and Guns.” Social Science Quarterly 98 (2): 443–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, Orlando. 2003. “Democratic Legitimacy and Public Insecurity: Crime and Democracy in El Salvador and Guatemala.” Political Science Quarterly 118 (4): 627–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Joseph, Hunter, Lance, and Murray, Gregg R.. 2013. “Voters versus Terrorists: Analyzing the Effect of Terrorist Events on Voter Turnout.” Journal of Peace Research 50 (4): 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Jon C., and Tucker, Patrick D.. 2019. “Critical Events and Attitude Change: Support for Gun Control after Mass Shootings.” Political Science Research and Methods 7 (4): 903–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sant’Anna, Pedro H. C., and Zhao, Jun. 2020. “Doubly Robust Difference-in-Differences Estimators.” Journal of Econometrics 219 (1): 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schildkraut, Jaclyn, and Elsass, H. Jaymi. 2016. Mass Shootings: Media, Myths, and Realities. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
Silva, Jason R., and Capellan, Joel A.. 2018. “The Media’s Coverage of Mass Public Shootings in America: Fifty Years of Newsworthiness.” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 43 (1): 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, Nate. 2016. “The Odds of an Electoral College-Popular Vote Split Are Increasing.” FiveThirtyEight , October 31. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-odds-of-an-electoral-college-popular-vote-split-are-increasing/.Google Scholar
Sood, Gaurav. 2016. Geographic Information on Designated Media Markets [computer file]. Version 9, Deaccessioned Version. Harvard Dataverse [distributor]. https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/IVXEHT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trelles, Alejandro, and Carreras, Miguel. 2012. “Bullets and Votes: Violence and Electoral Participation in Mexico.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 4 (2): 89–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velez, Yamil, and Martin, David. 2013. “Sandy the Rainmaker: The Electoral Impact of a Super Storm.” PS: Political Science & Politics 46 (2): 313–23.Google Scholar
Wike, Tracy, and Fraser, Mark. 2009. “School Shootings: Making Sense of the Senseless.” Aggression and Violent Behavior 14: 162–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, Coady, Simon, Kosali, and Bello-Gomez, Ricardo A.. 2018. “Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.” Annual Review of Public Health 39: 453–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: Link

García-Montoya et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5TBFXL
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

García-Montoya et al. supplementary material

García-Montoya et al. supplementary material

Download García-Montoya et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 486.1 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.