Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:38:06.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Structure of “Politics”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Fred M. Frohock
Fred M. Frohock*
Affiliation:
Syracuse University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Taxonomic definitions of politics are chronically unable to extend class properties to the heterogeneous scope of political events, leading to the view that “politics” may be a standard cluster concept. Clusters of properties, however, may be arranged around core terms strongly retentive in ordinary uses of a concept. Some terms are even rigid designators, necessary and sufficient conditions for reference in all possible worlds. The concept of “politics” provides two core terms, “directiveness” and “aggregation,” though not rigid designators. Such a core structure concentrates the standard cluster-analysis of “politics” on extension, not carrying over to all aspects of sense, thus permitting a weak and revised case for taxonomy on nonidentifying core terms. The implications of core terms in the concept of “politics” include the restriction of research-utility as an adequacy criterion and the acceptance of conventional status for distinctions between political and nonpolitical events.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , September 1978 , pp. 859 - 870
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel, and Coleman, James S., eds. (1960). The Politics of the Developing Areas. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. (1936). Language, Truth and Logic. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter (1967). The Theory of Democratic Elitism: A Critique. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton (1962). “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56:947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, Peter (1963). “Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical Framework.” American Political Science Review 57:632–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, Peter (1975). “Power and Its Two Faces Revisited: A Reply to Geoffrey Debnam.” American Political Science Review 79:900–04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Baruch (1975). Abortion and the Sanctity of Life: A Philosophical View. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Buchvarov, Panayet (1970). The Concept of Knowledge. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolph (1966). Philosophical Foundations of Physics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1972). Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. (Among other works.)Google Scholar
Connolly, William (1974). The Terms of Political Discourse. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, pp. 10–44.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert (1961). Who Governs. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert (1966). “Further Reflections on the Elitist Theory of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 60:296–305.Google Scholar
Debnam, Geoffrey (1975). “Nondecisions and Power: The Two Faces of Bachrach and Baratz.” American Political Science Review 79:889–99.Google Scholar
Debnam, Geoffrey (1975). “Rejoinder to ‘Comment’ by Peter Bachrach and Morton S. Baratz.” American Political Science Review 79:905–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, David (1953). The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Knopf, pp. 125–48.Google Scholar
Easton, David (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry (1973). “Authority Patterns: A Structural Basis for Political Inquiry.” American Political Science Review 67:1142–61.Google Scholar
Falk, W. D. (1963). “Morality, Self, and Others.” In Castaneda, Hector-Neri and Nakhnikian, George (eds.), Morality and the Language of Conduct. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Richard (1973). “On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy.” In Flathman, Richard (ed.), Concepts in Social and Political Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frohock, Fred M. (1974). “Notes on the Concept of Politics.” Journal of Politics 36:379–408.Google Scholar
Frohock, Fred M. (1977). “Systems Theory and Structural-Functional Analysis.” In Freeman, Donald M. (ed.), An Introduction to the Science of Politics. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Frohock, Fred M. (1975). “Individuals and Aggregates: The Generalization Argument Reconsidered.” Social Theory and Practice 3:343–66.Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B. (1955–1956). “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. London: Harrison.Google Scholar
Gray, John (1977). “On the Contestability of Social and Political Concepts.” Political Theory 5:331–48. (I wrote my article before seeing Gray's piece, but I think I am doing something like the identification of “skeletons in rival patterns of thought” which he urges for a research program in political philosophy.)Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Hart is content to direct his critical efforts at the Austinian tradition in law, but his main points are also relevant to those, like Almond, who endorse an imperative model of the state.)Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
de Jouvenal, Bertrand (1963). The Pure Theory of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul (1972). “Naming and Necessity.” In Davidson, Donald and Harmon, Gilberg (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language. Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, Claude (1963). Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, Claude (1966). The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Locke, Don (1969). “The Necessity of Analytic Truths.” Philosophy 54:12–32.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Alasdair (1973). “The Essential Contestability of Some Social Concepts.” Ethics 84:1–9.Google Scholar
Mitchell, William (1961). “Politics as the Allocation of Values: A Critique.” Ethics 71:79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1971). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean (1954). The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, Jean (1956). The Child's Conception of Space (with Barbel Inhelder). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1974). The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1962). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1970). “Is Semantics Possible?” Metaphilosophy 1:187–201.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1975). “The Meaning of ‘Meaning.’” In Gunderson, (ed.), Language, Mind, and Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1973). “Explanation and Reference.” In Pearce, Glenn and Maynard, Patrick (eds.), Conceptual Change. Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1971). “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In Rosenberg, Jay and Travis, Charles (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel (1935). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economc Science. London: Macmillan, p. 15.Google Scholar
Sabine, George (1939). “What is a Political Theory?” Journal of Politics 1:1–16.Google Scholar
Scriven, Michael (1959). “The Logic of Criteria.” Journal of Philosophy 56:857–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John (1959). “Proper Names.” Mind 67:166–73.Google Scholar
Searle, John (1970). Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sorzano, J. S. (1975). “David Easton and the Invisible Hand.” American Political Science Review 69:91–106.Google Scholar
Sorzano, J. S. (1977). “Values in Political Science: The Concept of Allocation.” Journal of Politics 39:24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Jack (1966). “A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 60:285–95.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack, (1966). “A Reply to Turther Reflections on The Elitist Theory of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 60:391–92.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953). Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1972). On Certainty. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.