Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:06:11.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategic Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of International Conflict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Curtis S. Signorino
Curtis S. Signorino*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although strategic interaction is at the heart of most international relations theory, it has largely been missing from much empirical analysis in the field. Typical applications of logit and probit to theories of international conflict generally do not capture the structure of the strategic interdependence implied by those theories. I demonstrate how to derive statistical discrete choice models of international conflict that directly incorporate the theorized strategic interaction. I show this for a simple crisis interaction model and then use Monte Carlo analysis to show that logit provides estimates with incorrect substantive interpretations as well as fitted values that can be far from the true values. Finally, I reanalyze a well-known game-theoretic model of war, Bueno de Mesquita and Lalman's (1992) international interaction game. My results indicate that there is at best modest empirical support for their model.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 279 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan, and Tucker, Richard. 1998. “Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (October: 1260–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorn, Paul A., and Vuong, Quang H.. 1984. “Simultaneous Equations Models for Dummy Endogenous Variables: A Game Theoretic Formulation with an Application to Labor Force Participation.” Social Science Working Paper 537. California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Bremer, Stuart. 1992. “Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816–1965.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (June: 309–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnahan, Timothy F., and Reiss, Peter C.. 1991. “Empirical Models of Discrete Games.” Journal of Econometrics 48 (April/May): 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Lalman, David. 1988. “Empirical Support for Systemic and Dyadic Explanations of International Conflict.” World Politics 41 (October: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Lalman, David. 1992. War and Reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James D., and Zorick, Ethan R.. 1997. “Capabilities, Perception, and Escalation.” American Political Science Review 91 (March: 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Hsiao Chi, Friedman, James W., and Thisse, Jacques-Francois. 1997. “Boundedly Rational Nash Equilibrium: A Probabilistic Choice Approach.” Games and Economic Behavior 18 (January: 32–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. “Signaling versus the Balance of Power and Interests.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (June: 236–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fey, Mark, McKelvey, Richard D., and Palfrey, Thomas R.. 1996. “An Experimental Study of the Constant-Sum Centipede Games.” International Journal of Game Theory 25 (3): 269–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. 1991. “Reciprocity in Superpower Relations: An Empirical Analysis.” International Studies Quarterly 35 (June: 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S., and Freeman, John R.. 1990. Three-Way Street: Strategic Reciprocity in World Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S., and Freeman, John R.. 1991. “U.S.-Soviet-Chinese Relations: Routine, Reciprocity, or Rational Expectations?” American Political Science Review 85 (March: 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagan, J. D. 1994. “Domestic Political Systems and War Proneness.” International Studies Review 38 (October: 183–207.Google Scholar
Huth, Paul. 1990. “The Extended Deterrent Value of Nuclear Weapons.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 34 (June: 270–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, Paul, Gelpi, Christopher, and Bennett, D. Scott. 1993. “The Escalation of Great Power Militarized Disputes.” American Political Science Review 87 (September: 609–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Donald. 1995. On the Origins of War and the Preservation of Peace. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Kim, Woosang, and de Mesquita, Bruce Bueno. 1995. “How Perceptions Influence the Risk of War.” International Studies Quarterly 39 (March: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Woosang, and Morrow, James D.. 1992. “When Do Power Shifts Lead to War?” American Journal of Political Science 36 (November: 896–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary. 1989a. “Event Count Models for International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 33 (June: 123–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary. 1989b. Unifying Political Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1989c. “Variance Specification in Event Count Models.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (June: 762–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 1994. Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 87 (September: 624–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa. 1992. Coersive Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFadden, Daniel. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zarambka, Paul, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McFadden, Daniel. 1976. “Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5 (Fall: 363–90.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael D., and Williams, John T.. 1989. “Change and Stability in Superpower Rivalry.” American Political Science Review 83 (December: 1101–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D., and Palfrey, Thomas R.. 1995. “Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games.” Games and Economic Behavior 10 (July: 6–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D., and Palfrey, Thomas R.. 1996. “A Statistical Theory of Equilibrium in Games.” Japanese Economic Review 47 (2): 186–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D., and Palfrey, Thomas R.. 1998. “Quantal Response Equilibria for Extensive Form Games.” Experimental Economics 1 (1): 9–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton, and Campbell, Sally H.. 1991. “Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (June: 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1991. “Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggregation Model of Alliances.” American Journal of Political Science 35 (November: 904–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pudney, Stephen. 1989. Modelling Individual Choice: The Econometrics of Corners, Kinks, and Holes. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Raymond, G. A. 1994. “Democracies, Disputes, and Third-Party Intermediaries.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (March: 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R. W. 1989. “A Boundedly-Rational Approach to the Study of Noncooperative Games.” International Journal of Game Theory 18 (3): 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Signorino, Curtis S. 1998. “Statistical Analysis of Finite Choice Models in Extensive Form.” Paper presented at the 1998 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Signorino, Curtis S., and Ritter, Jeffrey M.. N.d. “Tau-b or Not Tau-b: Measuring the Similarity of Foreign Policy Positions.” International Studies Quarterly. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Smith, Alastair. 1995. “Alliance Formation and War.” International Studies Quarterly 39 (December: 405–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alastair. 1997. “Political Selection: The Effect of Strategic Choice on the Escalation of International Crises.” Paper presented at the 1997 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. J. P. 1954. The Struggle for Mastery in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thucydides, . 1972. History of the Peloponnesian War. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Ward, Michael D., and Rajmaira, Sheen. 1992. “Reciprocity and Norms in U.S.–Soviet Foreign Policy.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (June: 342–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, John T., and McGinnis, Michael D.. 1988. “Sophisticated Reaction in the U.S.–Soviet Arms Race: Evidence of Rational Expectations.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (November: 968–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.