Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:25:59.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Second Session of the Seventy-fourth Congress, January 3, 1936, to June 20, 19361

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

O. R. Altman
Affiliation:
Williams College

Extract

The high command of the present Administration stipulated that all controversial reform legislation on the President's “must” list should be enacted during the first session of the Seventy-fourth Congress, leaving for its second meeting only the inevitable appropriation bills and whatever measures the exigencies of politics and government might make necessary. In accordance with this strategy, the President compelled Congress to remain in Washington until late August, 1935. When the legislators reassembled last January, there was common agreement that the second session would be brief, the “bonus” paid to the exservice men, routine administrative bills enacted, and that the members would then dash off to the quadrennial political war. After a White House conference, the House majority leader, Mr. Bankhead, announced that “the President wants as short a session as possible consistent with the public interest and any eventualities that may arise, caused by possible decisions of the Supreme Court affecting New Deal legislation.” Within a week the high court had invalidated the New Deal farm program and set in motion forces which could be depended upon to prolong and make turbulent the Congressional session. Throughout its duration, debate raged over implications of the separation of powers doctrine. Prominent Democrats asserted that the courts had exceeded their authority in nullifying certain acts passed by the representatives of the people. The Republican orators, on the other hand, generally welcomed the judicial check on the legislative branch but bewailed the “supine surrender of Congressional prerogatives to Executive dictation.” The inexorable rules of politics in an election year preordained that political considerations be given prominence in every legislative deliberation. Thus, directed by the President, pushed by organized minorities, challenged by the Supreme Court, tormented by fear of electoral repulse, our legislators stumbled unhappily through a hectic session.

Type
American Government and Politics
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 New York Times, January 1, 1936, p. 2Google Scholar.

3 Shortly after Congress adjourned, Senator Louis Murphy of Iowa was killed in an automobile accident. In slightly over a year, Senators Cutting, Long, Schall, and Murphy suffered violent deaths.

4 Mell G. Underwood of Ohio resigned to accept appointment as a United States district judge.

5 Requests like the following of Representative Taber of New York are frequent: “I ask unanimous consent to revise and extend the remarks I am about to make as well as those I have previously made today.” Record, p. 9884. (All references, unless otherwise indicated, are to the unbound copies of the 1936 Congressional Record.)

6 Record., p. 10284.

7 Record, p. 10566. Mr. Snell also termed it “the acme of all tight rules” and the “rankest operation of the Rules Committee I have ever known in the House of Representatives.” Ibid.

8 Record, p. 10491.

9 Record, p. 9712.

10 Record, p. 10298.

11 Record, pp. 9214, 9226.

12 Record, p. 9201. A few minutes later, Mr. George offered an amendment saying: “I offer the amendment for the sake of having it go to conference so that it may. be there considered, although I do not commit myself to it.” Mr. King answered: “For that purpose only I accept the amendment so that it may go to conference. Ibid., p. 9230.

13 Record, p. 9230.

14 Record, p. 9405. Speech of Rep. Lamneck in House.

15 Record, p. 10284.

16 Record, 10316.

17 Record, p. 10285. Denouncing the conference report on the tax bill before it was submitted in the Senate, Mr. Vandenberg claimed that it was “essentially a new bill.” Ibid., p. 10186.

18 Record, p. 9390.

20 Vice-President Garner announced before stating the result that it was the first time during his tenure as presiding officer that the entire elected membership had been present and voting.

21 Record, p. 10088.

22 Record, p. 9858.

23 Bound, Record, p. 6Google Scholar.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.