Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:56:49.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reason, Development, and the Conflicts of Human Ends: Sir Isaiah Berlin's Vision of Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Robert A. Kocis
Robert A. Kocis*
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At the root of the conflict between Berlin and his critics is a fundamental disagreement over the possibility of certainty and over the relation of human ends to politics. Gerald MacCallum's formalist critique obscures the political question of whose values a free person is at liberty to pursue. Macpherson's attempt to defend positive liberty as not rationalistic is shown to fail because he (a) conflates liberty with its conditions and (b) assumes a rational pattern to human moral development. And Crick charges Berlin with ignoring politics, understood as active participation in the polis. Finally, Berlin's conception of politics as a form of human interaction aimed at creating the conditions of human dignity in a situation where we sincerely disagree over the ends of life is shown to be an effort to liberate us to live life for our own purposes. Yet Berlin's defense of liberty is problematic because it is too skeptical; to overcome this difficulty, a non-teleological yet developmentalist account of human nature and a weakly hierarchical account of human values is suggested.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , September 1980 , pp. 38 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

SirBerlin, Isaiah (1953). The Hedgehog and the Fox. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
SirBerlin, Isaiah (1955). “Montesquieu.” Proceedings of the British Academy 41: 267–96.Google Scholar
SirBerlin, Isaiah (1956). “A Marvellous Decade IV: Herzen and the Grand Inquisitors.” Encounter 6, No. 5: 20–34.Google Scholar
SirBerlin, Isaiah (1962). “Does Political Theory Still Exist?” In Laslett, Peter and Runciman, W. G. (eds.), Philosophy, Politics, and Society, 2nd Ser., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
SirBerlin, Isaiah (1971). “The Question of Machiavelli.” New York Review of Books, 4 11 1971, pp. 20–32.Google Scholar
Crick, Bernard (1967). “Freedom as Politics.” In Laslett, Peter and Runciman, W. G. (eds.), Philosophy, Politics, and Society, 3rd Ser. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Fried, Charles (1970). The Anatomy of Values: Problems of Personal and Social Choice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Nicolai (1932). Ethics. Translated by Coit, StantonNew York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
MacCallum, Gerald (1972). “Negative and Positive Freedom.” In Laslett, Peter and Runciman, W. G. (eds.), Philosophy, Politics, and Society, 4th Ser. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. (1973). Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael (1962). Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael (1975). On Human Conduct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pennock, J. Roland (1979). Democratic Political Theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.