Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:33:26.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reading Nietzsche and Foucault: A Hermeneutics of Suspicion?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

J. Scott Johnson
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Leslie Paul Thiele
Affiliation:
University of Florida

Abstract

To what extent and in what respects does the political thought of Michel Foucault reflect the influence of Friedrich Nietzsche's ideas? In the September 1990 issue of this Review, Leslie Paul Thiele firmly asserted Nietzschean roots for Foucault's thought. In this Controversy, Thiele's claims are disputed by J. Scott Johnson. Johnson argues that Foucault's theory is rooted as much in Marx as in Nietzsche and that Foucault himself refuted Thiele's interpretation. In his response, Thiele takes issue with Johnson's critique.

Type
Controversies
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Rabinow, Paul. 1983. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. 2d ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. “What is an Author?” trans. Harari, Josué. In Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism, ed. Harari, Josué. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1985. “Final Interview.Raritan 5:113.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1986. “Nietzsche, Freud, Marx.Critical Texts 3:15.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988a. “Truth, Power, Self: An Interview with Michel Foucault.” In Technologies of the Self, ed. Martin, Luther, Gutman, Huck, and Hutton, Patrick. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988b. Politics, Philosophy, Culture, Interviews and Other Writings, 1977–1984. Ed. Kritzman, Lawrence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1989. Foucault Live. Ed. Lotringer, S.. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Gibbons, Michael T., ed. 1987. Interpreting Politics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1982a. Proflies and Critiques in Social Theory. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1982b. Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Colin. 1980. Afterword to Power/Knowledge by Foucault, Michel. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1971. Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. 1990. “The Critique of Impure Reason: Foucault and the Frankfurt School.Political Theory 18:437–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1974. The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1981. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smart, Barry. 1983. Foucault, Marxism, and Critique. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Thiele, Leslie Paul. 1990a. “The Agony of Politics: The Nietzschean Roots of Foucault's Thought.American Political Science Review 3:907–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiele, Leslie Paul. 1990b. Friedrich Nietzsche and the Politics of the Soul: A Study of Heroic Individualism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.