Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T16:11:41.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Puzzle of Indian Democracy: A Consociational Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Arend Lijphart
Arend Lijphart*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

India has been the one major deviant case for consociational (power-sharing) theory, and its sheer size makes the exception especially damaging. A deeply divided society with, supposedly, a mainly majoritarian type of democracy, India nevertheless has been able to maintain its democratic system. Careful examination reveals, however, that Indian democracy has displayed all four crucial elements of power-sharing theory. In fact, it was a perfectly and thoroughly consociational system during its first two decades. From the late 1960s on, although India has remained basically consociational, some of its power-sharing elements have weakened under the pressure of greater mass mobilization. Concomitantly, in accordance with consociational theory, intergroup hostility and violence have increased. Therefore, India is not a deviant case for consociational theory but, instead, an impressive confirming case.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 258 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arora, Balveer, and Mukarji, Nirmal. 1992. “Introduction: The Basic Issues.” In Federalism in India: Origins and Development, ed. Mukarji, Nirmal and Arora, Balveer. New Delhi: Vikas.Google Scholar
Austin, Granville. 1966. The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation. Bombay: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Ashis. 1992. “Federalism and Nationalism: An Attempt at Historical Interpretation.” In Federalism in India: Origins and Development, ed. Mukarji, Nirmal and Arora, Balveer. New Delhi: Vikas.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1975. “Political Accommodation and Consociational Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 5 (October): 477–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batliner, Gerard. 1981. Zur heutigen Lage des liechtensteinischen Parlaments. Vaduz: Verlag der Liechtensteinischen Akademischen Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Berg-Schlosser, Dirk. 1985. “Elements of Consociational Democracy in Kenya.” European Journal of Political Research 13 (March):95–109.Google Scholar
Bhambhri, C. P. 1971. “Electoral Reform and Party System in India: A Plea for Proportional Representation.” In Elections and Electoral Reform in India, ed. Kashyap, Subhash C.. New Delhi: Institute for Constitutional and Parliamentary Studies.Google Scholar
Brass, Paul R. 1990. The Politics of India Since Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brass, Paul R. 1991. Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Cannon, Gordon E. 1982. “Consociationalism vs. Control: Canada as a Case Study.” Western Political Quarterly 35 (March): 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chehabi, H. E. 1980. “The Absence of Consociationalism in Sri Lanka.” Plural Societies 11 (Winter): 55–65.Google Scholar
Chinwuba, Felix Aneze. 1980. “Consociationalism as an Approach to Political Integration: The Case of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.” Ph.D. diss., Tulane University.Google Scholar
Chryssochoou, Dimitris N. 1994. “Democracy and Symbiosis in the European Union: Towards a Confederal Consociation?” West European Politics 17 (October): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daalder, Hans. 1974. “The Consociational Democracy Theme.” World Politics 26 (July): 604–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daalder, Hans, and Irwin, Galen A., eds. 1989. Special Issue on “Politics in the Netherlands: How Much Change?” West European Politics 12 (January): 1–185.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A., and Tufte, Edward R.. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, Jyotirindra. 1989. “India: Democratic Becoming and Combined Development.” In Democracy in Developing Countries: Asia, ed. Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour Martin. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Dekmejian, Richard Hrair. 1978. “Consociational Democracy in Crisis: The Case of Lebanon.” Comparative Politics 10 (January): 251–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dew, Edward M. 1994. The Trouble in Suriname, 1975–1993. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dix, Robert H. 1980. “Consociational Democracy: The Case of Colombia.” Comparative Politics 12 (April): 303–21.Google Scholar
Engineer, Asghar Ali, ed. 1987. The Shah Bano Controversy. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Esman, Milton J. 1972. Administration and Development in Malaysia: Institution-Building and Reform in a Plural Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, Francine R. 1988. “Middle Classes and Castes in India's Politics: Prospects for Political Accommodation.” In India's Democracy: An Analysis of Changing State-Society Relations, ed. Kohli, Atul. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fyzee, Asaf A. A. 1964. Outlines of Muhammadan Law. 3d ed. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J. 1994. “Balancing Democracy and Stability: Considering the Democratic Deficit in the EU from a Consociational Perspective.” Presented at the Joint Sessions of Workshops of the European Consortium for Political Research, Madrid.Google Scholar
Goldman, Joseph Richard. 1985. “Consociational Authoritarian Politics and the 1974 Yugoslav Constitution: A Preliminary Note.” East European Quarterly 19 (June): 241–49.Google Scholar
Graziano, Luigi. 1980. “The Historic Compromise and Consociational Democracy: Toward a ‘New Democracy’?” International Political Science Review 1 (3): 345–68.Google Scholar
Halpern, Sue M. 1986. “The Disorderly Universe of Consociational Democracy.” West European Politics 9 (April): 181–97.Google Scholar
Hardgrave, Robert L. Jr. 1993. “India: The Dilemmas of Diversity.” Journal of Democracy 4 (October): 54–68.Google Scholar
Harrison, Selig S. 1960. India: The Most Dangerous Decades. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hartlyn, Jonathan. 1988. The Politics of Coalition Rule in Colombia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegde, Ramakrishna. 1986. Electoral Reforms: Lack of Political Will. Bangalore: Karnataka State Janata Party.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon. 1994. “Approaches to the Study of the EC: The Challenge to Comparative Politics.” West European Politics 17 (January): 1–30.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Arnold. 1982. “The Limits of ‘Consociational Democracy’ in the Gambia.” Civilisations 32 (2): 65–92.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1988. “One Soul at a Time: Political Science and Political Reform.” American Political Science Review 82 (March): 3–10.Google Scholar
Hussain, Abid. 1993. India: Challenges and Changes. New Delhi: Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
Huyse, Luc. 1987. De verzuiling voorbij. Louvain: Kritak.Google Scholar
Iyer, V. R. Krishna. 1987. The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. Lucknow: Eastern Book Company.Google Scholar
Jaisingh, Hari. 1992. “Time for a Second Republic.” In Reforming the Constitution, ed. Kashyap, Subhash C.. New Delhi: UBSPD.Google Scholar
Kashyap, Subhash C. 1992. “Constitution, Its Working and Need for Reforms.” In Reforming the Constitution, ed. Kashyap, Subhash C.. New Delhi: UBSPD.Google Scholar
Kathuria, Harbir Singh. 1990. President's Rule in India, 1967–89. New Delhi: Uppal.Google Scholar
Khan, Rasheeduddin. 1992. Federal India: A Design for Change. New Delhi: Vikas.Google Scholar
Khilnani, Sunil. 1992. “India's Democratic Career.” In Democracy: The Unfinished Journey, 508 BC to AD 1993, ed. Dunn, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 1990. Democracy and Discontent: India's Growing Crisis of Governability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kothari, Rajni. 1970. Politics in India. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Kothari, Rajni. 1976. Democratic Polity and Social Change in India: Crisis and Opportunities. Bombay: Allied.Google Scholar
Kothari, Rajni. 1989. Politics and the People: In Search of a Humane India. Delhi: Ajanta.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1993. “Consociational Democracy and Corporatism in Switzerland.” Publius 23 (Spring): 43–60.Google Scholar
Levine, Daniel H. 1973. Conflict and Political Change in Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1968. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1979. “Consociation and Federation: Conceptual and Empirical Links.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 12 (September): 499–515.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Majoritarian and Consensus Patterns of Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1985. Power-Sharing in South Africa. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1992. “Democratization and Constitutional Choices in Czecho-Slovakia, Hungary, and Poland,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 4 (April): 207–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. “Prospects for Power-Sharing in the New South Africa.” In Election '94 South Africa: The Campaigns, Results and Future Prospects, ed. Reynolds, Andrew. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Leon N. 1974. “The Political System of the European Community.” In Politics in Europe: Structures and Processes in Some Postindustrial Democracies, ed. Heisler, Martin O.. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Linder, Wolf. 1994. Swiss Democracy: Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian. 1979. “Stability in Deeply Divided Societies.” World Politics 31 (April): 325–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luther, Kurt Richard, and Müller, Wolfgang, eds. 1992. Special Issue on “Politics in Austria: Still a Case of Consociationalism?”West European Politics 15 (January): 1–226.Google Scholar
Luthera, Ved Prakash. 1964. The Concept of the Secular State and India. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1994. “The Correlates of Consensus Democracy and the Puzzle of Dutch Politics.” West European Politics 17 (October): 97–123.Google Scholar
Malaviya, S. P. 1992. “Case for a Constituent Assembly.” In Reforming the Constitution, ed. Kashyap, Subhash C.. New Delhi: UBSPD.Google Scholar
Masselos, Jim. 1985. Indian Nationalism: An History. New Delhi: Sterling.Google Scholar
Mehta, Piarey Lai. 1991. Constitutional Protection to Scheduled Tribes in India: In Retrospect and Prospects. Delhi: H. K. Publishers.Google Scholar
Messarra, Antoine Nasri. 1994. Théorie générate du système politique libanais. Paris: Cariscript.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1958 [1861]. Considerations on Representative Government. New York: Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
Mukarji, Nirmal, and Arora, Balveer. 1992. “Conclusion: Restructuring Federal Democracy.” In Federalism in India: Origins and Development, ed. Mukarji, Nirmal and Arora, Balveer. New Delhi: Vikas.Google Scholar
Mukarji, Nirmal, and Mathew, George. 1992. “Epilogue: Federal Issues, 1988–1990.” In Federalism in India: Origins and Development, ed. Mukarji, Nirmal and Arora, Balveer. New Delhi: Vikas.Google Scholar
Nehru, B. K. 1986. Thoughts on Our Present Discontents. New Delhi: Allied.Google Scholar
Nehru, B. K. 1992. “A Fresh Look at the Constitution.” In Reforming the Constitution, ed. Kashyap, Subhash C.. New Delhi: UBSPD.Google Scholar
Noorani, A. G. 1989. The Presidential System: The Indian Debate. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Olson, David M. 1994. “The Sundered State: Federalism and Parliament in Czechoslovakia.” In Parliaments in Transition: The New Legislative Politics in the Former USSR and Eastern Europe, ed. Remington, Thomas F.. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Pai Panandiker, V. A., and Mehra, Ajay. 1996. The Indian Cabinet and Governance of India. New Delhi: Konark.Google Scholar
Pathak, Bindeshwar. 1993. “Facets of the System: Presidential vs. Parliamentary.” In Perspectives on the Constitution, ed. Kashyap, Subhash S.. Delhi: Shipra.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 1970. Social Fragmentation and Political Hostility: An Austrian Case Study. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 1979. Book review of Arend Lijphart's Democracy in Plural Societies. In American Political Science Review 73 (March): 295–97.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 1982. Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Prasad, Anirudh. 1991. Reservation Policy and Practice in India: A Means to an End. New Delhi: Deep & Deep Publications.Google Scholar
Rae, Douglas W. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rajgopal, P. R. 1987. Communal Violence in India. New Delhi: Uppal.Google Scholar
Rao, S. Ramachandra. 1992. “Plea for a New Constitution.” In Reforming the Constitution, ed. Kashyap, Subhash C.. New Delhi: UBSPD.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. Brahmananda. 1992. “Case for Fundamental Changes.” In Reforming the Constitution, ed. Kashyap, Subhash C.. New Delhi: UBSPD.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Lloyd I., and Rudolph, Susanne Hoeber. 1987. In Pursuit of Lakshmi: The Political Economy of the Indian State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sathe, Vasant. 1991. National Government: Agenda for a New India. New Delhi: UBS.Google Scholar
Seth, J. D. 1971. “Towards a New Electoral Law.” In Elections and Electoral Reforms in India, ed. Kashyap, Subhash C.. New Delhi: Institute of Constitutional and Parliamentary Studies.Google Scholar
Sharif, Abu Saleh. 1993. Some Socio-Economic and Demographic Aspects of Population According to Religion in India. Bombay: Centre for the Study of Society and Secularism.Google Scholar
Sharma, Arvind. 1993. “Minority vs. Majority Rights.” In Perspectives on the Constitution, ed. Kashyap, Subhash C.. Delhi: Shipra.Google Scholar
Singh, L. P. 1986. Electoral Reform: Problems and Suggested Solutions. New Delhi: Uppal.Google Scholar
Srinivasavaradan, T. C. A. 1992. Federal Concept: The Indian Experience. New Delhi: Allied.Google Scholar
Steiner, Jürg. 1990. “Power-Sharing: Another Swiss ‘Export Product’?” In Conflict and Peacemaking in Multiethnic Societies, ed. Montville, Joseph V.. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Steiner, Jürg, and Dorff, Robert H. 1980. A Theory of Political Decision Modes: Intraparty Decision Making in Switzerland. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Suntharalingam, R. 1983. Indian Nationalism: An Historical Analysis. New Delhi: Vikas.Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Rupert. 1992. “South Africa: A Consociational Path to Peace?” Transformation 17: 1–11.Google Scholar
Trehan, Virender M. 1993. “Need for Change.” In Perspectives on the Constitution, ed. Kashyap, Subhash C.. Delhi: Shipra.Google Scholar
Van den Berghe, Pierre L. 1981. The Ethnic Phenomenon. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 1987. “What Kind of Electoral System for Plural Societies? India as an Example.” In The Logic of Multiparty Systems, ed. Holler, Manfred J.. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh. 1993a. “Contested Meanings: India's National Identity, Hindu Nationalism, and the Politics of Anxiety.” Daedalus 122 (Summer): 227–61.Google Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh. 1993b. “India's Democratic Exceptionalism and Its Troubled Trajectory.” Revised version of paper presented at the 1990 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh. 1995. “The Self-Correcting Mechanisms of Indian Democracy.” Seminar (Delhi) 425 (January): 38–41.Google Scholar
Vasovic, Vucina. 1992. “A Plea for Consociational Pluralism.” In The Tragedy of Yugoslavia: The Failure of Democratic Transformation, ed. Seroka, Jim and Pavlovic, Vukasin. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Vira, Dharma. 1992. “Inadequacy and Impracticability of the Present Constitution: Case for Major Amendments.” In Reforming the Constitution, ed. Kashyap, Subhash C.. New Delhi: UBSPD.Google Scholar
Von Vorys, Karl. 1975. Democracy Without Consensus: Communalism and Political Stability in Malaysia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, Myron. 1969. Party Building in a New Nation: The Indian National Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, Myron. 1989. The Indian Paradox: Essays in Indian Politics. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Wheare, K. C. 1964. Federal Government. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Worrall, Denis. 1981. “The Constitutional Committee of the President's Council.” Politikon 8 (December): 27–34.Google Scholar
Young, Crawford. 1976. The Politics of Cultural Pluralism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Haji Ahmad. 1989. “Malaysia: Quasi Democracy in a Divided Society.” In Democracy in Developing Countries: Asia, ed. Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour Martin. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide R. 1977. “Splitting the Difference: Federalization Without Federalism in Belgium.” In Ethnic Conflict in the Western World, ed. Esman, Milton J.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.