Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:19:32.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Professionalism, Realignment, and Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Morris P. Fiorina
Morris P. Fiorina*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The critique of my 1994 article by Stonecash and Agathangelou reflects a series of misconceptions and misunderstandings—about measures, methods, arguments, and findings. In this rejoinder I attempt to correct these. In addition, I clarify my methods and findings. First, I show that a formal statistical test indicates that limiting the analysis to the northern states is justified. Less formally, the professionalism hypothesis cannot work the same in the South as in the North unless levels of Democratic legislative strength can rise above 100%. Second, although clearly inferior to a pooled analysis, I show that a disaggregated (state-by-state) analysis is far more supportive of the professionalization hypothesis than the flawed results Stonecash and Agathangelou report. Third, despite the repeated assertions of Stonecash and Agathangelou, I demonstrate that there is no evidence that a long-term partisan realignment to the Democrats is occurring, and that, contrary to their methodological recommendations, the variables included in my analysis would capture it if it were. Finally, Stonecash and Agathangelou interpret my research as indicating a lack of relationship between constituencies and who gets elected. That is simply not a correct reading of my article.

Type
Forum
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 91 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 156 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Black, Earl, and Black, Merle 1987. Politics and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles S. III. 1988. “Regional Realignment from an Officeholding Perspective.” Journal of Politics 50 (08):553–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, James E. 1986. “Presidential Coattails and Midterm Losses in State Legislative Elections.” American Political Science Review 80 (03):45–63.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 1996. “The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Chubb, John E. 1988. “Institutions, the Economy and the Dynamics of State Elections.” American Political Science Review 82 (03): 133–54.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1977. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. 1st ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1992. Divided Government. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1994. “Divided Government in the American States: A Byproduct of Legislative Professionalism?” American Political Science Review 88 (06):304–16.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1996. Divided Government. 2d ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert A. 1968. “Issues in Multiple Regression.” American Journal of Sociology 73 (2):592–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1959. “Secular Realignment and the Party System”. The Journal of Politics 21 (05):198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, and Gelman, Andrew. 1991. “Systematic Consequences of Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 35 (03): 110–38.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Karl T. 1991. “Understanding the Diversity of State Legislatures: The Red, White, and Blue Legislatures.” Denver: National Conference of State Legislatures.Google Scholar
Simon, Dennis M., Ostrom, Charles W. Jr., and Marra, Robin F.. 1991. “The President, Referendum Voting, and Subnational Elections in the United States.” American Political Science Review 85 (12):1177–92.Google Scholar
Stonecash, Jeffrey M., and Agathangelou, Anna M.. 1997. “Trends in the Partisan Composition of State Legislatures: A Response to Fiorina.” American Political Science Review 91 (03):148–61.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.