No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
“Problems of an Other’s Making”: B. R. Ambedkar, Caste, and Majoritarian Domination
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2024
Abstract
This article presents a new theory of majoritarian domination drawn from Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar’s critique of majoritarian tyranny during the decades preceding British India’s decolonization. Ambedkar’s critique of British colonial pluralism and Congress-led Indian anticolonialism emphasizes attention to social structures and the mechanisms that produce and sustain communal majorities. He argues that caste prevents equality and fraternity, thus foreclosing the possibility of a democratic society. In such a context, Ambedkar argues that the majority is likely to be communal and fixed, rather than political, inclusive, and open to change over time. Ambedkarian majoritarian domination supplements nineteenth-century accounts of the institutional and epistemic dimensions of majoritarian tyranny. I defend comparison as a tool for theoretical analysis to show that Ambedkarian majoritarian domination can explain the interaction of hierarchical social structures with democratic politics in contexts beyond colonial India.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Abizadeh, Arash. 2021a. “Counter-Majoritarian Democracy: Persistent Minorities, Federalism, and the Power of Numbers.” American Political Science Review, 115 (3): 742–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. 2021b. “The Scope of the All-Subjected Principle: On the Logical Structure of Coercive Laws.” Analysis 81 (4): 603–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambedkar, B. R. 2016a. Annihilation of Caste: The Annotated Critical Edition. New Delhi, India: Navayana.Google Scholar
Ambedkar, B. R. 2016b. B. R. Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches. Vol. 1–21. Mumbai, India: Government of Maharashtra.Google Scholar
Ambedkar, B. R. 2016c. “Philosophy of Hinduism.” In B. R. Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, 3:3–94. Mumbai, India: Government of Maharashtra.Google Scholar
Ambedkar, B. R. 2016d. “Ranade, Gandhi, and Jinnah.” In B. R. Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches. Vol. 1. Mumbai, India: Government of Maharashtra.Google Scholar
Ambedkar, B. R. 2016e. “The Untouchables—Or the Children of India’s Ghetto.” In B. R. Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches. Vol. 5. Mumbai, India: Government of Maharashtra.Google Scholar
Ambedkar, B. R. 2016f. “Thoughts on Pakistan, or the Partition of India.” In B. R. Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches. Vol. 8. Mumbai, India: Government of Maharashtra.Google Scholar
Ambedkar, B. R. 2016g. “What Gandhi and the Congress Have Done to the Untouchables.” In B. R. Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches. Vol. 9. Mumbai, India: Government of Maharashtra.Google Scholar
Aptheker, Herbert. 1938.
The Negro in the Civil War.
New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Bagg, Samuel Ely. 2024. The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajpai, Rochana. 2011. Debating Difference: Group Rights and Liberal Democracy in India. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajpai, Rochana. 2021. “Religious Pluralism and the State in India Toward a Typology.” In Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism: India, Pakistan, and Turkey, eds. Barkey, Karen, Kaviraj, Sudipta, and Naresh, Vatsal, 139–56. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkey, Karen, and Naresh, Vatsal. 2021. “Thinking through Majoritarian Domination in Turkey and India.” In Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism: India, Pakistan, and Turkey, eds. Barkey, Karen, Kaviraj, Sudipta, and Naresh, Vatsal, 342–65. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27 (1): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhaskar, Anurag. 2024. The Foresighted Ambedkar: Ideas That Shaped Indian Constitutional Discourse. Gurgaon: India Viking.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Udit. 2024. “The Pedagogical Account of Parliamentarism at India’s Founding.” American Journal of Political Science. 68 (4): 1286–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, Cristina. 2006. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. [1891] 2008. The American Commonwealth. Vol. 2. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Burden-Stelly, Charisse. 2020. “Caste Does Not Explain Race.” Boston Review, December 15.Google Scholar
Cháirez-Garza, Jesús F. 2024. Rethinking Untouchability: The Political Thought of B. R. Ambedkar. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cháirez-Garza, Jesús F., Gergan, Mabel Denzin, Ranganathan, Malini, and Vasudevan, Pavithra. 2022. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Rethinking Difference in India through Racialization.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 45 (2): 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, Moyukh. 2023. Composing Violence: The Limits of Exposure and the Making of Minorities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. 2018. “Ambedkar’s Theory of Minority Rights.” In The Radical in Ambedkar: Critical Reflections, eds. Teltumbde, Anand and Yengde, Suraj, 107–33. Delhi, India: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Chatterji, Angana P, Hansen, Thomas Blom, and Jaffrelot, Christophe, eds. 2020. Majoritarian State: How Hindu Nationalism Is Changing India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conti, Gregory. 2023. “Introduction.” In Albert Venn Dicey: Writings on Democracy and the Referendum, ed. Conti, Gregory, viii–xxxix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Oliver C. 1948. Caste, Class, & Race: A Study in Social Dynamics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, Sandipto. 2024. Legalizing the Revolution: India and the Constitution of the Postcolony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De, Rohit. 2018. “Lawyering as Politics: The Legal Practice of Dr Ambedkar, Bar at Law.” In The Radical in Ambedkar: Critical Reflections, eds. Teltumbde, Anand and Yengde, Suraj, 134–52. Delhi, India: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Deshpande, Satish. 2013. “Caste and Castelessness: Towards a Biography of the ‘General Category.’” Economic and Political Weekly 48 (15): 32–39.Google Scholar
Devji, Faisal. 2013. Muslim Zion: Pakistan as a Political Idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devji, Faisal. 2021. “Fatal Love: Intimacy and Interest in Indian Political Thought.” In Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism: India, Pakistan, and Turkey, eds. Barkey, Karen, Kaviraj, Sudipta, and Naresh, Vatsal, 75–94. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. [1916] 2024. Democracy and Education. ed. Tampio, Nicholas. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, Nicholas B. 2002. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Delhi: Permanent Black.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disch, Lisa Jane. 2021. Making Constituencies: Representation as Mobilization in Mass Democracy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. [1903] 1999. The Souls of Black Folk, eds. Henry Louis Gates Jr. and Terri Hume Oliver. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. [1935] 2021. Black Reconstruction: An Essay toward a History of the Part Which Black Folk Played in the Attempt to Reconstruct Democracy in America, 1860–1880, & Other Writings. eds. Foner, Eric and Gates, Henry Louis. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
Duong, Kevin. 2021. “Universal Suffrage as Decolonization.” American Political Science Review 115 (2): 412–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Avigail. 2020. “The Rights of National Majorities: Toxic Discourse or Democratic Catharsis?” Ethnicities 20 (2): 312–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2014. “Tyranny and Brutality of the Majority.” In Majority Decisions: Principles and Practices, eds. Novak, Stéphanie and Elster, Jon, 159–76. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Lee Ann. 2021. Show Time: The Logic and Power of Violent Display. ed. Finnemore, Martha. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Geetha, V. 2021. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar and the Question of Socialism in India. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getachew, Adom. 2019. Worldmaking after Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Getachew, Adom, and Mantena, Karuna. 2021. “Anticolonialism and the Decolonization of Political Theory.” Critical Times 4 (3): 359–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding-Williams, Robert. 2024. “Democratic Despotism, Democratic Culture, and the Democratic Ideal.” The Monist 107 (1): 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopal, Ashok. 2023. A Part Apart: The Life and Thought of B.R. Ambedkar. New Delhi, India: Navayana.Google Scholar
Gorup, Michael. 2020. “The Strange Fruit of the Tree of Liberty: Lynch Law and Popular Sovereignty in the United States.” Perspectives on Politics 18 (3): 819–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, Alex. 2024. “Structural Domination and Social Reproduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Republicanism, eds. Lovett, Frank and Sellers, Mortimer. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197754115.013.27.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2023. “Systemic and Structural Injustice: Is There a Difference?” Philosophy 98 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Clarissa Rile. 2013. How Americans Make Race: Stories, Institutions, Spaces. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Christine Dunn. 2022. “Beyond the ‘Formidable Circle’: Race and the Limits of Democratic Inclusion in Tocqueville’s Democracy in America.*” Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (1): 94–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ince, Onur Ulas. 2024. “From ‘Chinese Colonist’ to ‘Yellow Peril’: Capitalist Racialization in the British Empire.” American Political Science Review 118 (4): 1748–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, Sean. 2022. “Representative Democracy and Social Equality.” American Political Science Review 116 (2): 689–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, Sean. 2024. “Domination in Majoritarian Democracy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Republicanism, eds. Lovett, Frank and Sellers, Mortimer. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197754115.013.20.Google Scholar
Ingham, Sean, and Kolodny, Niko. 2023. “Is One More Powerful with Numbers on One’s Side?” Journal of Political Philosophy 31 (4): 452–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, Kajri. 2014. “The Handbag That Exploded: Mayawati’s Monuments and the Aesthetics of Democracy in Post-Reform India.” In New Cultural Histories of India, eds. Thakurta, Tapati Guha, Chatterjee, Partha, and Kar, Bodhisattva, 139–79. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jensenius, Francesca R. 2017. Social Justice through Inclusion: The Consequences of Electoral Quotas in India. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Andrew. 1866. “The Claims of Our Race,” Interview, Washington, DC, February 7, 1866, Douglass Papers, ser. 1, 4:96–105.Google Scholar
Kapila, Shruti. 2021. Violent Fraternity: Indian Political Thought in the Global Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaviraj, Sudipta. 1992. “The Imaginary Institution of India.” In Subaltern Studies VII, eds. Chatterjee, Partha and Pandey, Gyanendra, 1–39. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaviraj, Sudipta. 2021. “Plurality and Pluralism: Democracy, Religious Difference, and Political Imagination.” In Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism: India, Pakistan, and Turkey, eds. Barkey, Karen, Kaviraj, Sudipta, and Naresh, Vatsal, 221–48. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Steven. 2022. “Democracy Requires Organized Collective Power.” Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (1): 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, Niko. 2023. The Pecking Order: Social Hierarchy as a Philosophical Problem. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1997. Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Joel G. 2021.
Deceptive Majority: Dalits, Hinduism, and Underground Religion.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2019. How Democracies Die. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S., and Singh, Prerna. 2017. “Census Enumeration and Group Conflict: A Global Analysis of the Consequences of Counting.” World Politics 69 (1): 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood. 2020. Neither Settler nor Native. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 2010. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mantena, Karuna. 2010. Alibis of Empire: Henry Maine and the Ends of Liberal Imperialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantena, Rama Sundari. 2023. Provincial Democracy: Political Imaginaries at the End of Empire in Twentieth-Century South India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathew, Jaby. N.d. “Democratic Representation and the Shadow of Colonialism.” Book Manuscript.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. 2011. Machiavellian Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, Uday S. 2016. “Indian Constitutionalism: Crisis, Unity, and History.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution, eds. Choudhry, Sujit, Khosla, Madhav, and Mehta, Pratap Bhanu, 38–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1833. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume X-Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1959] 1977. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XIX-Essays on Politics and Society Part II. ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mitta, Manoj. 2023. Caste Pride: Battles for Equality in Hindu India. Chennai, India: Context.Google Scholar
Naresh, Vatsal. 2018. “Pride and Prejudice in Austin’s Cornerstone: Preliminary Reflections on Passions in the Constituent Assembly of India.” In The Indian Constituent Assembly: Deliberations on Democracy, ed. Bhatia, Udit, 58–82. Delhi, India: Routledge.Google Scholar
NDTV. 2019. “Ravish Kumar’s Magsaysay Speech: WhatsApp and Public Are My Newsroom.” Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeWzsDpCg2w.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2016. “Ambedkar’s Constitution: Promoting Inclusion, Opposing Majority Tyranny.” In Assessing Constitutional Performance, eds. Ginsburg, Tom and Huq, Aziz, 295–336. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paik, Shailaja. 2022. “Dalit Feminist Theory.” Chapter 5 in Routledge Handbook of Gender in South Asia, ed. Fernandes, Leela, second edition. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paik, Shailaja. 2023. The Vulgarity of Caste: Dalits, Sexuality, and Humanity in Modern India. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Parasher, Tejas. 2023. Radical Democracy in Modern Indian Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, Alan. 2020a. “Populist Multiculturalism: Are There Majority Cultural Rights?” Philosophy & Social Criticism 46 (5): 539–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, Alan. 2020b. “The Idea of Israel as a Jewish State.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 21 (2): 531–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Daniel, and Schafer, Saskia. 2021. “Who Are Indonesia’s Islamist Majoritarians and How Influential Are They?” In Religion and Identity Politics: Global Trends And Local Realities, eds. Mathew, Mathews and Tay, Melvin, 96–129. London: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramesh, Hari. 2022. “BR Ambedkar on Caste, Democracy, and State Action.” Political Theory 50 (5): 723–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, Anupama. 2010. The Caste Question: Dalits and the Politics of Modern India. Ranikhet, India: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Rathore, Aakash Singh. 2020. Ambedkar’s Preamble: A Secret History of the Constitution of India. Gurgaon, India: Vintage.Google Scholar
Rathore, Aakash Singh. 2023. Becoming Babasaheb: The Life and Times of Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar. Volume 1, Birth to Mahad (1891–1929). Gurugram: Harper Collins India.Google Scholar
Rawat, Ramnarayan S. 2003. “Making Claims for Power: A New Agenda in Dalit Politics of Uttar Pradesh, 1946–48.” Modern Asian Studies 37 (3): 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Shaunna. 2021. “Self-Respect as a Primary Political Ideal: Ambedkar’s Challenge to Political Theory.” Chapter 10 in B R Ambedkar: The Quest for Justice; Vol. 1: Political Justice, ed. Rathore, Aakash Singh. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Valerian. 2024. Ambedkar’s Political Philosophy: A Grammar of Public Life from the Social Margins. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2018. “Autocratic Legalism.” The University of Chicago Law Review 85 (2): 545–84.Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2014. Counting the Many: The Origins and Limits of Supermajority Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skaria, Ajay. 2018. “Ambedkar, Marx and the Buddhist Question.” In Imagining the Public in Modern South Asia, eds. Ingram, Brannon, Barton Scott, J., and Tareen, SherAli K., 104–19. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smångs, Mattias. 2016. “Doing Violence, Making Race: Southern Lynching and White Racial Group Formation.” American Journal of Sociology 121 (5): 1329–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroud, Scott R. 2023. The Evolution of Pragmatism in India: Ambedkar, Dewey, and the Rhetoric of Reconstruction. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sultan, Nazmul. 2024. Waiting for the People: The Idea of Democracy in Indian Anticolonial Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Teltumbde, Anand. 2018. Republic of Caste: Thinking Equality in the Time of Neoliberal Hindutva. New Delhi, India: Navayana.Google Scholar
Teltumbde, Anand. 2021. “Ambedkar and Democracy: Critical Reflections.” Chapter 3 in B R Ambedkar: The Quest for Justice; Vol. 1: Political Justice, ed. Rathore, Aakash Singh. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teltumbde, Anand. 2024. Iconoclast: A Reflective Biography of Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar. Gurgaon: India Viking.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2003. Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. [1835–1840] 2012. Democracy in America, ed. Nolla, Eduardo, trans. Schleifer, James T, 2 vols. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Vithayathil, Trina. 2018. “Counting Caste: Censuses, Politics, and Castelessness in India.” Politics and Society 46 (4): 455–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vundru, Raja Sekhar. 2018. Ambedkar, Gandhi and Patel: The Making of India’s Electoral System. New Delhi, India: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Vundru, Raja Sekhar. 2022. “Ambedkar’s Alternatives to Electoral Safeguards and Electoral Representation of Untouchables and Minorities.” In Politics of Representation: Historically Disadvantaged Groups in India’s Democracy, eds. Pai, Sudha and Thorat, Sukhadeo, 101–18. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waghmore, Suryakant. 2019. “Community, Not Humanity: Caste Associations and Hindu Cosmopolitanism in Contemporary Mumbai.” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 42 (2): 375–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Joy. 2024. “Colonial Genealogies of Pluralism: Consociation as Disavowal in Contemporary Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542400090X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells-Barnett, Ida B. 1895.
A Red Record: Tabulated Statistics and Alleged Causes of Lynchings in the United States, 1892-1893-1894
. Respectfully Submitted to the Nineteenth Century Civilization in “the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.” Chicago, IL: Donohue & Henneberry.Google Scholar
Wilkerson, Isabel. 2020. Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Williams, Melissa S. 1998. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. [1990] 2011. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.