Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-qhdkw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-17T20:31:40.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

MARK E. WARREN
MARK E. WARREN*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
*
Mark E. Warren is Professor, Department of Political Science, C425 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z1, Canada ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the last few decades, democratic theory has grown dramatically in its power and sophistication, fueled by debates among models of democracy. But these debates are increasingly unproductive. Model-based strategies encourage theorists to overgeneralize the place and functions of ideal typical features of democracy, such as deliberation or elections. Here I sketch an alternative strategy based on the question: What kinds of problems does a political system need to solve to count as “democratic”? I suggest three general kinds: it should empower inclusions, form collective agendas and wills, and have capacities to make collective decisions. We can view common practices such as voting and deliberating as means for addressing these problems, and theorize institutional mixes of practices that would maximize a political system's democratic problem-solving capacities. The resulting theories will be both normatively robust and sufficiently fine-grained to frame democratic problems, possibilities, and deficits in complex polities.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 111 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 39 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Midwest Political Science Association, the University of Helsinki, the University of Amsterdam, the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Peking University, the University of Stuttgart, and the University of Zurich. I am very grateful to the audiences for their comments and criticisms. Thank you to Richard Avramenko, Edana Beauvais, Steven Forde, Claudio Lopez-Guerra, Jane Mansbridge, Graham Smith, Johannes Pollack, Melissa Williams, and the anonymous reviewers of this journal for their helpful thoughts and recommendations. Research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Grant No. 435-2012-1747.

References

REFERENCES

Bohman, James. 1996. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 2007. Democracy across Borders: From Dêmos to Dêmoi. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 2001. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce E., Dalton, Russell J., and Scarrow, Susan E., eds. 2004. Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone. 2003. “Deliberative Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 307–26.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, and Rogers, Joel. 2003. “Power and Reason.” In Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, eds. Fung, Archon and Wright, Erik Olin. New York: Verso, 237–58.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Fish, Steven, Hicken, Allen, Kroenig, Matthew, Lindberg, Staffan I., McMann, Kelly, Paxton, Pamela, Semetko, Holli A., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Staton, Jeffrey, and Teorell, Jan. 2011. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (2): 247–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S., and List, Christian. 2003. “Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation.” British Journal of Political Science 33 (1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John. 2010. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Michael. 2009. Civil Society, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1997. “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, eds. Bohman, James and Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–34.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, ed. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estlund, David. 2009. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, David. 2001. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. Hampshire: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1984. “Truth and Power.” In The Foucault Reader, ed. Rabinow, Paul. New York: Pantheon, 51–74.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon, and Warren, Mark E.. 2011. “The Participedia Project: An Introduction.” With Archon Fung. International Public Management Journal 14 (3): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, Archon. 2003. “Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” Journal of Political Philosophy 11: 338–67.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon. 2006. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review 66: 66–75.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon. 2013. “The Principle of All-Affected Interests: An Interpretation and Defense. In Representation: Elections and Beyond, eds. Nagel, Jack H. and Smith, Rogers M.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 236–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghandi, Jennifer. 2008. Politicial Institutions Under Dictatorship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1986. The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 2007. “Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and its Alternatives.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 35: 40–68.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 2008. Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice after the Deliberative Turn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two: Life-World and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. “Discourse Ethics: Notes on Program of Philosphical Justification.” Moral Conscienceness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 43–115.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1994. “Three Normative Models of Democracy.” Constellations 1 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
He, Baogang, and Warren, Mark E.. “Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (2): 269–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, David. 2006. Models of Democracy. 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Klosko, George. 2005. Political Obligations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack, and Johnson, James. 1994. “Aggregation and Deliberation: On the Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy.” Political Theory 22 (2): 277–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Jack, and Johnson, James. 2011. The Priority of Democracy: The Political Consequences of Pragmatism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Landemore, Helene. 2013. Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Trans. Bednarz, John Jr., Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. 1977. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, with Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, Christiano, Tom, Fung, Archon, Parkinson, John, Thompson, Dennis, and Warren, Mark. 2012. In Deliberative Systems, eds. Parkinson, John and Mansbridge, Jane. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, with Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, Estlund, David, Føllesdal, Andreas, Fung, Archon, Lafont, Christina, Manin, Bernard, and Martí, José Luis. 2010. “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 64–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Macedo, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press, 211–42.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2006. “Conflict and Self-Interest in Deliberation.” In Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents, eds. Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2011. “On the Importance of Getting Things Done.” Perspectives on Politics 45 (1): 1–8.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo, and Mansbridge, Jane. 2015. Political Negotiation: A Handbook. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali, and Karpowitz, Christopher F.. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 1992. “Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice.” Political Studies 40: 54–67.Google Scholar
Mintrom, Michael. 2003. “Market Organizations and Deliberative Democracy: Choice and Voice in Public Service Delivery.” Administration and Society 35: 52–81.Google Scholar
Montanaro, Laura. 2012. “The Democratic Legitimacy of Self-Appointed Representatives.” Journal of Politics 74 (4): 1094–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrell, Michael. 2010. Empathy and Democracy: Feeling, Thinking, and Deliberation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1999. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social Research 66 (3): 745–58.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. 2008. “The Original Meaning of “Democracy”: Capacity to Do Things, Not Majority Rule.” Constellations 15 (1): 3–9.Google Scholar
Owen, David, and Smith, Graham. 2015. “Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (2): 213–34.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2012. On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambrige University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Proportional and Majoritarian Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1998. “Deliberation and Ideological Domination.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. New York: Cambridge University Press, 140–60.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2010. Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2005. The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy, and Institutional Design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2008, Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2011. Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, Lynn. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25 (3): 347–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 2005. “What is an Institution?” Journal of Institutional Economics 1 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 1999. “Enough Deliberation: Politics Is about Interests and Power.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Macedo, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press, 28–38.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2013. “Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’.” Political Studies 61 (1): 2–22.Google Scholar
Smith, Graham. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Eva. 1997. “Democracy and Empowerment.” Public Administration 75: 553–67.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 1998. “Pathologies of Deliberation.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. New York: Cambridge University Press, 123–39.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 2002. Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2007. Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1969 [1835, 1840]. Democracy in America, 2 vols. Translated by George Lawrence, ed. Mayer, J. P.. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry. 1995. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vermeule, Adrian. 2007. Mechanisms of Democracy: Institutional Design Writ Small. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. ed. 1999. Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2001. Democracy and Association. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2002. “Deliberative Democracy.” In Democratic Theory Today, eds. Stokes, Geoffrey and Carter, April. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 173–202.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2006. “Democracy and the State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, eds. Dryzek, John, Honig, Bonnie, and Phillips, Anne. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 382–99.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2011. “Voting with Your Feet: Exit-Based Empowerment in Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review: 105 (4): 683–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2014. “Governance-Driven Democratization.” In Practices of Freedom: Democracy, Conflict and Participation in Decentred Governance, eds. Griggs, Steven, Norval, Aletta, and Wagenaar, Hendrik. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 38–59.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. and Gastil, John. 2015. “Can Deliberative Minipublics Address the Cognitive Challenges of Democratic Citizenship?” Journal of Politics 77 (2): 562–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark E., and Mansbridge, Jane. 2015. “Deliberative Negotiation.” In Political Negotiation: A Handbook, eds. Martin, Cathie Jo and Mansbridge, Jane. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2013 [1922].Economy and Society, vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Whelan, Frederick J. 1983. “Prologue: The Boundary Problem.” NOMOS, vol. 25, Liberal Democracy, 13–47.Google Scholar
Williams, Melissa S. 2009. “Citizenship as Agency within Communities of Shared Fate.” In Unsettled Legitimacy: Political Community, Power, and Authority in a Global Era, eds. Bernstein, Steven and Coleman, William D.. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 76 (6): 22–43.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.