Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:43:09.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Price Elasticity of Mass Preferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Donald Philip Green*
Affiliation:
Yale University

Abstract

I compare the price elasticity of economic and political preferences. My central hypothesis is that willingness to pay, whether expressed verbally or through cash transactions, is more price-elastic for economic consumption goods than for public goods. I find that increases in price greatly diminish the proportion of people willing to pay for consumer goods, such as housing or hardback books; whereas the proportion willing to pay more in taxes to support a public good, such as environmental protection or shelter for the homeless, is much less responsive to changes in price. I conclude by discussing the theoretical and political implications of willingness to pay for public and private goods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Jack. 1964. “A New Method of Testing Pricing Decisions.” Journal of Marketing 24:4146.Google Scholar
Adam, Daniel. 1958. Les réactions du consommateur devant de prix. Paris: SEDES.Google Scholar
Banks, Seymour. 1950. “The Relationship of Preference and Purchase of Brands.” Journal of Marketing 15:145–57.10.1177/002224295001500202Google Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen, and Dye, Thomas R.. 1982. “Sources of Public Opinion on Taxes: The Florida Case.” Journal of Politics 44:172–82.10.2307/2130290Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226217062.001.0001Google Scholar
Bohm, Peter. 1972. “Estimating Demand for Public Goods: An Experiment.” European Economic Review 3:111–30.10.1016/0014-2921(72)90001-3Google Scholar
Bolton, Ruth N. 1989. “The Robustness of Retail-level Price Elasticity Estimates.” Journal of Retailing 65:193219.Google Scholar
Brookshire, David S., and Coursey, Don L.. 1987. “Measuring the Value of a Public Good: An Empirical Comparison of Elicitation Procedures.” American Economic Review 77:554–66.Google Scholar
Cameron, Trudy Ann. 1988. “A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15:355–79.10.1016/0095-0696(88)90008-3Google Scholar
Cameron, Trudy Ann, and Huppert, Daniel D.. 1989. “OLS versus ML Estimation of Non-Market Resource Values with Payment Card Interval Data.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17:230–46.10.1016/0095-0696(89)90018-1Google Scholar
Cialdini, Robert B., and Schroeder, David A.. 1976. “Increasing Compliance by Legitimizing Paltry Contributions: When Even a Penny Helps.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34:599604.10.1037/0022-3514.34.4.599Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, and Green, Donald Philip. 1990. “The Self-Interest Motive in American Public Opinion.” Research in Micropolitics 3:128.Google Scholar
Collard, David A. 1978. Altruism and Economy: A Study in Nonselfish Economics. Oxford: Martin Robinson.Google Scholar
Cox, Anthony D. 1986. “New Evidence Concerning Consumer Price Limits.” Advances in Consumer Research 13:268–71.Google Scholar
Cramer, Jan S. 1971. Empirical Econometrics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Cummings, Ronald G., Brookshire, David S., and Schulze, William D., eds. 1986. Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld.Google Scholar
Diamond, William D., and Campbell, Leland. 1989. “The Framing of Sales Promotions: Effects on Reference Price Change.” Advances in Consumer Research 16:241–47.Google Scholar
Dickie, Timothy A., Fisher, Ann, and Gerking, Shelby. 1987. “Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative Study.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 82:6975.10.1080/01621459.1987.10478392Google Scholar
Eastman, Clyde, Randall, Alan, and Hoffer, Peggy L.. 19741975. “How Much To Abate Pollution?Public Opinion Quarterly 38:574–84.10.1086/268184Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, Andrew, and Mills, Pam. 1990. Viewer's Willingness To Pay. London: International Thomson Business.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1986. “The Case for a Multiple-Utility Conception.” Economics and Philosophy 2:159–83.10.1017/S1478061500002619Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1988. The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, Joseph. 1975. Americans and the Arts: A Survey of Public Opinion. New York: Associated Council of the Arts.Google Scholar
Fraser, Cynthia, Hite, Robert E., and Sauer, Paul L.. 1988. “Increasing Contributions in Solicitation Campaigns: The Use of Large and Small Anchorpoints.” Journal of Consumer Research 15:284–87.10.1086/209166Google Scholar
Gabor, André 1985. Pricing: Principles and Practices. Brookfield, VT: Gower.Google Scholar
Gallup Organization. 1985. Annual Report on Book Buying. Princeton: Gallup Organization.Google Scholar
Green, Donald Philip. 1988. “Self-Interest, Public Opinion, and Mass Political Behavior.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Green, Donald Philip, and Gerken, Ann Elizabeth. 1989. “Self-Interest and Public Opinion toward Smoking Restrictions arid Cigarette Taxes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53:116.10.1086/269138Google Scholar
Green, Paul E., and Tull, Donald S.. 1978. Research for Marketing Decisions. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Heberlein, Thomas A., and Bishop, Richard C.. 1986. “Accessing the Validity of Contingent Valuation: Three Field Experiments.” Science of the Total Environment 56:99107.10.1016/0048-9697(86)90317-7Google Scholar
Jones, D. Frank. 1975. “A Survey Technique To Measure Demand under Various Pricing Strategies.” Applied Marketing 40:7577.10.1177/002224297503900316Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 1986. “Comment.” In Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contigent Valuation Method, ed. Cummings, Ronald G., Brookshire, David S., and Schulze, William D.. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Knetch, Jack L.. N.d. “Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. Jr., 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sanders, Lynn M.. 1990. “Mimicking Political Debate with Survey Questions: The Case of White Opinion on Affirmative Action for Blacks.” Social Cognition 8:73103.10.1521/soco.1990.8.1.73Google Scholar
Kluegel, James R., and Smith, Eliot R.. 1982. “Whites' Beliefs about Blacks' Opportunity.” American Sociological Review 47:518–32.10.2307/2095196Google Scholar
Knetsch, Jack L., and Sinden, J. A.. 1984. “Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in the Measures of Value.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98:509–21.Google Scholar
Kosenko, Rustan. 1989. “On Price Limit Measurement: The Order Effect.” Advances in Consumer Research 16:248–52.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., Brown, Thad A., and Sears, David O.. 1978. “Self-Interest and Civilians' Attitudes toward the Vietnam War.” Public Opinion Quarterly 42:464–83.10.1086/268474Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Sears, David O.. 1981. “Cognitive Links between Economic Grievances and Political Responses.” Political Behavior 3:279302.10.1007/BF00989811Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, Donald R., and Burton, Scot. 1989. “The Relationship between Perceived and Objective Price-Quality.” Journal of Marketing Research 26:429–43.10.1177/002224378902600405Google Scholar
Lynn, Michael. 1990. “Choose Your Own Price: An Exploratory Study Requiring an Expanded View of Price's Functions.” Advances in Consumer Research 17:710–14.Google Scholar
McConahay, John B. 1982. “Self-Interest Versus Racial Attitudes As Correlates of Anti-Busing Attitudes in Louisville: Is It the Buses or the Blacks?Journal of Politics 44:692720.10.2307/2130514Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. 1988. Introduction to Econometrics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1985. “Myth and Reality: The ERA and the Gender Gap in the 1980 Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49:164–78.10.1086/268912Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1990. “Self-Interest in Political Life.” Political Theory 18:132–53.10.1177/0090591790018001007Google Scholar
Mitchell, Robert Cameron, and Carson, Richard T.. 1989. Using Surveys To Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Monroe, Kent B. 1977. “Objective and Subjective Contextual Influences on Price Perceptions.” In Consumer and Industrial Buying Behavior, ed. Woodside, Arch G., Sheth, Jagdish N., and Bennett, Peter D.. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Monroe, Kent B. 1979. Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Walter. 1984. Microeconomic Theory. Chicago: Dryden.Google Scholar
Petroshius, Susan M., and Monroe, Kent B.. 1987. “Effect of Product-line Pricing Characteristics on Product Evaluations.” Journal of Consumer Research 13:511–19.10.1086/209084Google Scholar
Quandt, Richard E. 1956. “A Probabilistic Theory of Consumer Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 70:507–36.10.2307/1881863Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1954. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 36:387–89.10.2307/1925895Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 1979. Injury to Insult: Unemployment, Class, and Political Response. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schulze, William D., d'Arge, Ralph C. and Brookshire, David S.. 1981. “Valuing Environmental Commodities: Some Recent Experiments.” Land Economics 57:151–72.10.2307/3145783Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Citrin, Jack. 1985. Tax Revolt: Something for Nothing in California. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1990. “Self-Interest in Americans' Political Opinions.” In Beyond Self-interest, ed. Mansbridge, Jane J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., Hensler, Carl P., and Speer, Leslie K.. 1979. “Whites' Opposition to “Busing”: Self-interest or Symbolic Politics?American Political Science Review 74:670–84.10.2307/1958149Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Huddy, Leohie. 1987. “Bilingual Education: Symbolic Meaning and Support among Non-Hispanics.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Lau, Richard R.. 1983. “Inducing Apparently Self-interested Political Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 27:222–52.10.2307/2111016Google Scholar
Sears, David O., Lau, Richard R., Tyler, Tom R., and Allen, Harris M. Jr., 1980. “Self-Interest and Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting.” American Political Science Review 74:670–84.10.2307/1958149Google Scholar
Sears, David O., Tyler, Tom R., Citrin, Jack, and Kinder, Donald R.. 1978. “Political System Support and Public Response to the Energy Crisis.” American Journal of Political Science 22:5682.10.2307/2110669Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1977. “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6:317–44.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Mahajan, Harpreet. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50:4261.10.1086/268958Google Scholar
Snyder, Karen C. 1991. “Political Contributors: A Hierarchy among the Elite.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Studenski, Paul. 1939. “How Polls Can Mislead.” Harper's Magazine 180:8083.Google Scholar
Tellis, Gerard J. 1988. “The Price Elasticity of Selective Demand: A Meta-Analysis of Econometric Models of Sales.” Journal of Marketing Research 25:331–41.10.1177/002224378802500401Google Scholar
Udell, Jon G. 1965. “Can Attitude Measurement Predict Consumer Behavior?Journal of Marketing 29:4650.10.1177/002224296502900409Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1977. “Unemployment, Class Consciousness, and Radical Politics: What Didn't Happen in the Thirties.” Journal of Politics 39:291323.10.2307/2130053Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.