Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:12:46.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Responses to Pain and Loss Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1998

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

M. Kent Jennings
M. Kent Jennings*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although manifestations of pain and loss phenomena are treated in various parts of the discipline, the focus is seldom on pain and loss as a distinctive form of political experience or as one that offers a broad canvas on which the workings of the political process can be depicted. By contrast, this article makes four arguments: (1) pain and loss experiences cut to the core of everyday lives and frequently infuse them with politics; (2) responses to pain and loss events occupy a prominent place in the domains of public opinion and issue activism; (3) these events and responses have some unique properties; and (4) major research questions can be organized around the study of pain and loss phenomena.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 93 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almeida, Paul, and Stearns, Linda Brewster. 1998. “Political Opportunities and Local Grassroots Environmental Movements: The Case of Minamata.” Social Problems 45(02):37–60.Google Scholar
Altman, Roberta. 1996. Waking Up, Fighting Back: The Politics of Breast Cancer. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, Katherine. 1997. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belkin, Lisa. 1996. “How Breast Cancer Became This Year's Cause.” New York Times Magazine, 12 22.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Edward D. 1987. Disabled Policy: America's Programs for the Handicapped. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Birkland, Thomas. 1997. After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bosso, Christopher J. 1987. “Setting the Agenda: Mass Media and the Discovery of Famine in Ethiopia.” In Manipulating Public Opinion, ed. Margolis, Michael and Mauser, Gary. Pacific Grove, CA.: Brooks-Cole. Pp. 154–74.Google Scholar
Burgoon, Judee K., Burgoon, Michael, and Wilkinson, Miriam. 1983. “Dimensions of Content Readership in 10 Newspaper Markets.” Journalism Quarterly 60(Spring):74–80.Google Scholar
Burke, Thomas F. 1997. “On the Right Track: The Americans with Disabilities Act.” In Comparative Disadvantages?: Social Regulations and the Global Economy, ed. Nivola, Pietro S.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Pp. 242–91.Google Scholar
Cohen, Cathy Jean. 1993. “Power and Resistance and the Construction of Crisis: Marginalized Communities Respond to AIDS.” Ph.D. diss. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Couto, Richard A. 1992. “What's Political about Self-Help?” Social Policy 23(Fall–Winter):39–43.Google Scholar
Craig, Barbara Hinkson, and O'Brien, David M.. 1993. Abortion and American Politics. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Dowie, Mark. 1995. Losing Ground: American Environmentalism at the Close of the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1972. “Up and Down with Ecology—the Issue Attention Cycle.” Public Interest 28(Summer):38–50.Google Scholar
Epstein, Steven. 1996. Impure Science: Aids, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Erbring, Lutz, Goldenberg, Edie, and Miller, Arthur. 1980. “Frontpage News and Real World Cues: A New Look at Agenda Setting by the Media.” American Journal of Political Science 24(03):16–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischhoff, Baruch, Slovic, Paul, and Lichtenstein, Sarah. 1982. “Lay Foibles and Expert Fables in Judgments about Risk.” American Statistician 36(08):240–55.Google Scholar
Funkhouser, G. Ray. 1973. “The Issues of the Sixties: An Exploratory Study in the Dynamics of Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 37(Spring):62–75.Google Scholar
Gamson, Joshua. 1989. “Silence, Death, and the Invisible Enemy: AIDS Activism and Social Movement ‘Newness.”” Social Problems 46(10):351–65.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 1997. Mass Media and American Politics, 5th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Michael R., Sachsman, David B., Sandman, Peter M., and Salomone, Kandice L.. 1989. “Risk, Drama and Geography in Coverage of Environmental Risk by Network TV.” Journalism Quarterly 66(Summer):267–76.Google Scholar
Gross, Michael L. 1995. “Moral Judgment, Organizational Incentives and Collective Action: Participation in Abortion Politics.” Political Research Quarterly 48(09):507–34.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, Maurice. [1980] 1950. Collective Memory. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Holloway, Harry C., and Fullerton, Carol S.. 1994. “The Psychology of Terror and Its Aftermath.” In Individual and Community Responses to Trauma and Disaster: The Construction of Human Chaos, ed. Ursano, Robert J., McCaughey, Brian G., and Fullerton, Carol S.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News that Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Janoff-Baulman, Ronnie, and Frieze, Irene Hanson. 1983. “A Theoretical Perspective for Understanding Reactions to Victimization.” Journal of Social Issues 39(2):1–17.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Andersen, Ellen Ann. 1996. “Support for Confrontational Tactics among AIDS Activists: A Study of Intra-Movement Divisions.” American Journal of Political Science 2(05):311–34.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sanders, Lynn M.. 1996. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2d ed. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Klein, Ethel, Campbell, Jacquelyn, Soler, Esta, and Ghez, Marissa. 1997. Ending Domestic Violence: Changing Perceptions/Halting the Epidemic. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. 1964. “American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies and Political Theory.” World Politics 16(07):677–93.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B. 1981. “Social Communication and the Mass Policy Agenda.” In More Than News: Media Power in Public Affairs, ed. MacKuen, Michael B. and Combs, Steven. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 19–146.Google Scholar
Malt, Ulrik Fredrik. 1994. “Traumatic Effects of Accidents.” In Individual and Community Responses to Trauma and Disaster: The Construction of Human Chaos, ed. Ursano, Robert J., McCaughey, Brian G., and Fullerton, Carol S.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 103–35.Google Scholar
Marullo, Sam. 1990. “Patterns of Peacemaking in the Local Freeze Campaign.” In Peace Action in the Eighties: Social Science Perspectives, ed. Marullo, Sam and Lofland, John. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Pp. 246–64.Google Scholar
Mayer, William C. 1992. The Changing American Mind: How and Why American Public Opinion Changed between 1960 and 1988. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1983. “Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency.” American Sociological Review 48(12):735–54.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1996. “The Framing Function of Movement Tactics: Strategic Dramaturgy in the American Civil Rights Movement.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, ed. McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 335–56.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., eds. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structure, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John D. 1994. “Activists, Authorities, and Media Framing of Drunk Driving.” In New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, ed. Larana, Enrique, Johnston, Hank, and Gusfield, Joseph R.. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. Pp. 133–67.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John D., and Wolfson, Mark. 1996. “Resource Mobilization by Local Social Movement Organizations: Agency, Strategy, and Organizations in the Movement against Drinking and Driving.” American Sociological Review 61(12):1070–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Aldon D. 1993. “Birmingham Confrontation Reconsidered: An Analysis of the Dynamics and Tactics of Mobilization.” American Sociological Review 58(10):621–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Barbara J. 1984. Making an Issue of Child Abuse: Political Agenda Setting for Social Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Neuman, W. Russell. 1990. “The Threshold of Pubic Attention.” Public Opinion Quarterly 54(Summer):159–76.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Kimberly, and Deane, Claudia. 1997. “Ten Years of Pew News Interest Index.” Presented at the 1997 meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Norfolk, VA.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. N.d. “1997 Top Ten Release.” Forthcoming.Google Scholar
PR Solutions. 1995. “Media Audit.” Washington, DC: Family Violence Prevention Fund.Google Scholar
Reich, Michael. 1991. Toxic Politics: Response to Chemical Disasters. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Reinarman, Craig. 1988. “The Social Construction of an Alcohol Problem.” Theory and Society 17(01):91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Stanley, and Lichter, S. Robert. 1987. “Elite Ideology and Risk Perception in Nuclear Energy Policy.” American Political Science Review 81(06):383–404.Google Scholar
Scarry, Elaine. 1985. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schepple, Kim Lane. 1996. “Constitutionalizing Abortion.” In Abortion Politics: Public Policy in Cross-Cultural Perspective, ed. Githens, Marianne and Stetson, Dorothy McBride. New York: Routledge. Pp. 29–54.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87(06):334–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuman, Howard, and Scott, Jacqueline. 1989. “Generations and Collective Memories.” American Sociological Review 54(06):351–81.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1990. “Self-Interest in Americans' Political Opinions.” In Beyond Self-Interest, ed. Mansbridge, Jane J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 147–70.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, Welch, Susan, Bledsoe, Timothy, and Combs, Michael. 1997. “Police Brutality and Public Perception of Racial Discrimination: A Tale of Two Beatings.” Political Research Quarterly 50(12):777–91.Google Scholar
Singer, Eleanor, and Endreny, Phyllis M.. 1993. Reporting on Risk: How the Mass Media Portray Accidents, Diseases, Disasters, and Other Hazards. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul. 1987. “Perception of Risk.” Science 236(04 17):280–5.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul. 1996. “Perception of Risk from Radiation.” Radiation Protection Dosimetry 68(314):165–80.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul, Fischhoff, Baruch, and Lichtenstein, Sarah. 1980. “Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk.” In Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough? ed. Schwing, Richard C. and Albers, Walter A. Jr. New York: Plenum. Pp. 181–216.Google Scholar
Sprungen, Deborah. 1998. Homicide: The Hidden Victims. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stabiner, Karen. 1997. To Dance with the Devil: The New War on Breast Cancer. New York: Delacorte.Google Scholar
Staggenborg, Suzanne. 1991. The Pro-Choice Movement: Organization and Activism in the Abortion Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetson, Dorothy McBride. 1996. “Feminist Perspectives on Abortion and Reproductive Technologies.” In Abortion Politics: Public Policy in Cross-Cultural Perspective, ed. Githens, Marianne and Stetson, Dorothy McBride. New York: Routledge. Pp. 211–24.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah. 1997. Policy Paradox: the Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Teske, Nathan. 1997. Political Activists in America: The Identity Construction Model. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toobin, Jeffrey. 1997. “Victim Power.” New Yorker, 03 24, pp. 40–43.Google Scholar
Truman, David B. [1951] 1971. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. 2d ed. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Tuch, Steven A., and Weitzer, Ronald. 1997. “The Polls—Trends: Racial Differences in Attitudes toward Police.” Public Opinion Quarterly 61(Winter):642–63.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walls, David. 1993. The Activist's Almanac: The Concerned Citizen's Guide to Leading Advocacy Organizations in America. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Walsh, Edward J. 1988. Democracy in the Shadows: Citizen Mobilization in the Wake of the Accident at Three Mile Island. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Walsh, Edward J., and Warland, Rex H.. 1983. “Social Movement Involvement in the Wake of a Nuclear Accident: Activists and Free Riders in the TMI Area.” American Sociological Review 48(12):764–80.Google Scholar
Walters, Lynne Masel, Wilkens, Lee, and Walters, Tim, eds. 1989. Bad Tidings: Communication and Catastrophe. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Weed, Frank J. 1989. “The Impact of Support Resources on Local Chapter Operations in the AntiDrunk-Driving Movement.” Sociological Quarterly 30(Spring):77–91.Google Scholar
Weed, Frank J. 1990. “The Victim-Activist Role in the Anti-Drunk Driving Movement.” Sociological Quarterly 31(Fall):459–73.Google Scholar
Weisaeth, Lars. 1994. “Psychological and Psychiatric Aspects of Technological Disasters.” In Individual and Community Responses to Trauma and Disaster: The Construction of Human Chaos, ed. Ursano, Robert J., McCaughey, Brian G., and Fullerton, Carol S.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 72–102.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1974. Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Winerip, Michael. 1998. “Does Local TV News Have to Be So Bad?” New York Times Magazine, 01 11, 1998.Google Scholar
Wolliver, Laura R. 1993. From Outrage to Action. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Woolley, John T. 1998. “Using Media Reports as Indicators of Policy Processes.” University of California, Santa Barbara. Typescript.Google Scholar
Zald, Mayer N. 1996. “Culture, Ideology, and Strategic Framing.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, ed. McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 261–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.