Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:37:35.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Outside Options and the Logic of Security Council Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2017

Erik Voeten
Erik Voeten*
Affiliation:
George Washington University and Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I examine if and how a superpower can use its asymmetric power to achieve favorable outcomes in multilateral bargaining between states that have conflicting interests and veto power. Using a game-theoretic framework, I show that the ability to act outside, either unilaterally or with an ally, helps the superpower to reach agreements that would be vetoed in the absence of the outside option. These agreements, however, are usually not at the superpower's ideal point. Under some conditions, uncertainty about the credibility of the outside option can lead to unilateral action that all actors prefer to avoid. In other circumstances, this uncertainty results in multilateral actions that the superpower (and the ally) would not initiate without multilateral authorization. The model provides useful insights that help explain patterns of decision-making in the United Nations Security Council in the 1990s, including the failed attempt to reach agreement over the Kosovo intervention.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 95 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 845 - 858
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 1998. “Why States Act through Formal International Organizations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (February): 3–32.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert O.. 1985. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics 38 (October): 226-54.Google Scholar
Bailey, Sidney D., and Daws, Sam. 1998. The Procedure of the UN Security Council, 3d ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Baker, James A. III. 1995. The Politics of Diplomacy: Revolution, War and Peace: 1989–1992. New York: Putnam's.Google Scholar
Binmore, Kenneth, Shaked, Avner, and Sutton, John. 1989. “An Outside Option Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 (November): 753-70.Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J. 1996. “Chinese Realpolitik.” Foreign Affairs 75 (September/October): 37–53.Google Scholar
Christopher, Warren. 1998. In the Stream of History: Shaping Foreign Policy for a New Era. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Patricia. 1999. “Trading Places; Ground Wars Make Strange Bedfellows.” New York Times, May 30, Week in Review, p. 5.Google Scholar
Crossette, Barbara. 1998. “Security Council Tells Serbs to Stop Kosovo Offensive.” New York Times, September 24, Sec. A8.Google Scholar
Crossette, Barbara. 1999. “China and Others Reject Pleas that U.N. Intervene in Civil Wars.” New York Times, September 23, Sec. A5.Google Scholar
Daalder, Ivo H., and O'Hanlon, Michael E.. 2000. Winning Ugly: NATO's War to Save Kosovo. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Durch, William J., ed. 1993. The Evolution of UN Peacekeeping: Case Studies and Comparative Analysis. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Erlanger, Steven. 1998. “NATO Approval Renews Threat of Force in Kosovo.” New York Times, August 4, Sec. A3.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88 (September): 577-93.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1997. “Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (February): 68–91.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1998. “Bargaining, Enforcement and International Cooperation.” International Organization 52 (Spring): 269–305.Google Scholar
Fravel, M. Taylor. 1996. “China's Attitude toward U.N. Peacekeeping Operations since 1989.” Asian Survey 36 (November): 1102-21.Google Scholar
Fromuth, Peter J. 1993. “The Making of a Security Community: The United Nations after the Cold War.” Journal of International Affairs 46 (Winter): 341-66.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1992. “International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community's Internal Market.” International Organization 46 (Spring): 533-60.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Lyle. 1995. “American Multilateralism in the Persian Gulf Crisis.” Department of Politics. Princeton University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Golotyuk, Yury. 1999. “Russia Is Already Participating in NATO Operations in Balkans.” Izvestia, March 10, p. 2.Google Scholar
Goshko, John M. 1997. “China Backs U.N. Monitors for Guatemala; Veto Reversal Allows Forces to Observe Cease-Fire Pact.” Washington Post, January 21, Sec. A12.Google Scholar
Guicherd, Catherine. 1999. “International Law and the War in Kosovo.” Survival 41 (Summer): 25-9.Google Scholar
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, and Rittberger, Volker. 1997. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1999. “The Lonely Superpower.” Foreign Affairs 78 (March): 35–49.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Youssef M. 1998. “U.N. Measures Skirts Outright Threat of Force against Milosevic.” New York Times, October 25, Sec. A6.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. “Realism(s) and Chinese Security Policy in the Post-Cold War.” In Unipolar Politics; Realism and State Strategies after the Cold War, ed. Kapstein, Ethan B. and Manstanduno, Michael. New York: Columbia University Press. Pp. 261–318.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert. 1999a. “Clinton's Kosovo Collapse.” The Weekly Standard, February 1, p. 15.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert. 1999b. “Into Kosovo.” The Weekly Standard, March 1, Editorial, p. 7.Google Scholar
Kim, Samuel S., ed. 1994. China and the World: Chinese Foreign Relations in the Post-Cold War Era. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1973. The World in Depression 1929–1939. London: Allen Lane, Penguin.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1976. “State Power and the Structure of International Trade.” World Politics 28 (April): 317-47.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier.” World Politics 43 (April): 336-66.Google Scholar
Krauthammer, Charles. 1999. “Empty Threats, Useless Gestures.” Washington Post, March 5, A33.Google Scholar
Kubicek, Paul. 1999. “Russian Foreign Policy and the West.” Political Science Quarterly 114 (Winter): 547-68.Google Scholar
Lampton, David M. 1998. “China.” Foreign Policy 110 (Spring): 13–27.Google Scholar
Levitin, Oleg. 2000. “Inside Moscow's Kosovo Muddle.” Survival 42 (Spring): 130-40.Google Scholar
Lexis-Nexis. 1998. “Russia's Victory in Kosovo.” Russica. Kommersant Daily, October 15, p. 4.Google Scholar
Lockwood, Christopher. 1998. “Plan to stop Milosevic in disarray; Britain and US may have to go it alone.” Daily Telegraph, October 8, p. 1.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, Neil. 1999. “Realism and Russian Strategy after the Collapse of the USSR.” In Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies after the Cold War, ed. Kapstein, Ethan B. and Mastanduno, Michael. New York: Columbia University Press. Pp. 218-60.Google Scholar
Malone, David. 1998. Decision-Making in the UN Security Council: The Case of Haiti, 1990–1997. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Michael. 1999. “A Perfect Failure: NATO's War against Yugoslavia.” Foreign Affairs 78 (September/October): 2–8.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 1992. “Interests, Power, and Multilateralism.” International Organization 46 (Autumn): 765-92.Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael. 1997. “Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and US Grand Strategy after the Cold War.” International Security 21 (Spring): 49–88.Google Scholar
McFaul, Michael. 1997. “A Precarious Peace: Domestic Politics in the Making of Russian Foreign Policy.” International Security 22 (Winter): 5–35.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton. 1990. “Issue Linkages in International Crisis Bargaining.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (May): 311-33.Google Scholar
Morganthau, Hans. 1948. Politics among Nations. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1986. “A Spatial Model of International Conflict.” American Political Science Review 80 (December): 1131-50.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1989. “Capabilities, Uncertainty and Resolve: A Limited Information Model of Crisis Bargaining.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (November): 941-72.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1994a. Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1994b. “Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution versus Information.” International Organization 48 (Summer): 387–423.Google Scholar
Muthoo, Abhinay. 1999. Bargaining Theory with Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, Steven Lee. 1998. “U.S. Urging NATO to Step Up Plans to Act against Yugoslavia.” New York Times, September 24, Sec. A8.Google Scholar
Nathan, Andrew, and Ross, Robert S.. 1997. The Great Wall and the Empty Fortress: China's Search for Security. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Barry. 1996. “Power and Satisfaction in the Security Council.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 40 (June): 219-37.Google Scholar
Papayoanou, Paul A. 1997. “Intra-Alliance Bargaining and U.S. Bosnia Policy.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (February): 91–116.Google Scholar
Petrovskaya, Yulia. 1999. “Yugoslavia Will Not Be Bombarded for the Time-Being.” Nezavisima Gazeta, February 24, p. 1.Google Scholar
Reuters. 1998. “NATO and Other European Troops Plan Exercises to Warn Serbs.” New York Times, August 7, Sec. A5.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Ariel. 1982. “Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model.” Econometrica 50 (January): 97–110.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, ed. 1997. The Once and Future Security Council. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Sandier, Todd, and Harley, Keith. 1999. The Political Economy of NATO: Past, Present, and into the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 1998. “Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises.” American Political Science Review 92 (December): 829-45.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 2001. “Looking for Audience Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (February): 32–60.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. N.d. “Tying Hands, Washing Hands, and Dragging Feet; the U.S. Congress and Multilateral Humanitarian Intervention.” In The Interaction of International and Domestic Institutions, ed. Drezner, Daniel. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Segal, Gerald. 1995. Defending China. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smirnov, Andrei. 1999. “Igor Ivanov Rectifies Mistakes of Americans.” Segodnya, March 12, p. 3.Google Scholar
Smith, Alastair. 1998. “International Crises and Domestic Politics.” American Political Science Review 92 (September): 623-39.Google Scholar
Smouts, Marie-Claude. 1998. “The Political Aspects of Peace-Keeping Operations.” In United Nations Peace-Keeping Operations; A Guide to French Policies, ed. Stern, Brigitte. New York: United Nations University Press. Pp. 7–39.Google Scholar
Sobel, Richard. 1998. “The Poll-Trends: United States Intervention in Bosnia.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62 (Summer): 250–329.Google Scholar
Sysoyev, Gennady. 1998. “Russia's Victory in Kosovo.” Kommersant Daily, October 15, p. 4.Google Scholar
Thalakada, Nigel. 1997. China's Voting Pattern in the Security Council, 1990–1995. In The Once and Future Security Council, ed. Russett, Bruce. New York: St. Martin's. Pp. 83–118.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert W. 1999. “Alone or with Others?” Foreign Affairs 78 (November/December): 15–20.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 1998. Voting Practices in the United Nations: A Report to Congress for the Year 1998. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Waller, J. Michael. 1997. “Primakov's Imperial Line.” Perspective 7 (January/February): 2–6.Google Scholar
Whitney, Craig R. 1999. “Born Again; The Doves of Yesteryear Fly Off to a Different War.” New York Times, April 18, Week in Review, p. 1.Google Scholar
Winter, Eyal. 1996. “Voting and Vetoing.” American Political Science Review 90 (December): 813-24.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C. 1999. “The Stability of a Uni-Polar World.” International Security 24 (Summer): 5–42.Google Scholar
Yusin, Maxim. 1998. “Moscow Trims Its Balkan Policy.” Izvestia, August 19, p. 3.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.