Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:22:11.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes from the Editors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2010

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Virtually all of this issue's articles challenge conventional belief in some area of political science.

Race in U.S. political history. If the Civil War freed and enfranchised African-Americans, by 1874 the tide had begun to recede; and the corrupt bargain that settled the Presidential election of 1876 but ended Reconstruction and hastened the rollback, not only of the “equal protection of the laws” that the Fourteenth Amendment had guaranteed, but of voting rights and desegregation. By the 1890s, “Jim Crow” and racial hierarchy were again entrenched.

Type
From the Editor: In This Issue
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 104 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. iii - viii
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 William T. Bianco, Itai Sened, and Regina Smyth.

2 Thomas M. Carsey, John C. Green, Richard Herrera, and Rosalyn Cooperman.

3 Trager is Assistant Professor of Political Science at UCLA. In accordance with our standard procedures for avoiding conflicts of interest, the review and editing of this article were handled by two external members of the APSR Editorial Board—Kenneth Schulz and Curt Signorino—whose expertise and contribution we gratefully acknowledge.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.