Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:31:14.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Political Legitimacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

M. Stephen Weatherford
M. Stephen Weatherford*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Political legitimacy is a key concept in both macro and micro theories. Pioneers in survey-based research on alienation and system support envisioned addressing macro questions about legitimacy with the sophisticated empiricism of individual-level methodology but failed; and a succession of innovations in item wording and questionnaire construction only led to an excessive concern with measurement issues at the individual level. I return to an enumeration of the informational requirements for assessing legitimacy in hopes of finding a conceptualization that better utilizes available survey indicators to tap relevant macro dimensions. I specify formal measurement models for both conventional and revised conceptualizations of legitimacy orientations and compare the fit of the two models systematically on data from the U.S. electorate. The revised model appears preferable on both theoretical and empirical grounds.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 86 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 149 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberbach, Joel, 1969. “Alienation and Political Behavior.” American Political Science Review 63:86–99.10.2307/1954286Google Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., and Aldrich, John H.. 1982. “The Decline of Electoral Participation in America.” American Political Science Review 76:502–21.10.2307/1963728Google Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., and Finifter, Ada W.. 1981. “On The Meaning of Political Trust: New Evidence from Items Introduced in 1978.” American Journal of Political Science 25:297–307.10.2307/2110854Google Scholar
Abravenal, M., and Busch, R.. 1975. “Political Competence, Political Trust, and the Action Orientation of University Students.” Journal of Politics 37:57–82.10.2307/2128891Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1956. “Comparative Political Systems.” Journal of Politics 18:391–409.10.2307/2127255Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400874569Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney. 1980. The Civic Culture Revisited. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Alves, Wayne M., and Rossi, Peter H.. 1978. “Who Should Get What? Fairness Judgments in the Distribution of Earnings.” American Journal of Sociology 84:541–64.10.1086/226826Google Scholar
Alwin, D. F., and Jackson, D. J.. 1979. “Measurement Models for Response Errors in Surveys: Issues and Applications.” In Sociological Methodology 1980, ed. Schuessler, Karl F.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1970. Sociologists, Economists, and Democracy. London: Collier–Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. 1990. “Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models.” Psychological Bulletin 107:238–46.10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M., and Bonnett, D. G.. 1980. “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures.” Psychological Bulletin 88:588–606.10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M., and Chou, Chih-ping. 1988. “Practical Issues in Structural Modeling.” In Common Problems/Proper Solutions, ed. Long, J Scott. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9781118619179Google Scholar
Burns, James MacGregor. 1963. The Deadlock of Democracy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Gurin, Gerald, and Miller, Warren E.. 1954. The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Carmines, E. G., and MacIver, J. P.. 1981. “Analyzing Models with Unobserved Variables: Analysis of Covariance Structures.” In Sociological Measurement: Current Issues, ed. Bohrnstedt, George W. and Borgatta, E. F.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack. 1974. “Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government.” American Political Science Review 68:973–88.10.2307/1959141Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, and Green, Donald Philip. 1986. “Presidential Leadership and the Resurgence of Trust in Government.” British Journal of Political Science 16:431–53.10.1017/S0007123400004518Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1972. “Change in the American Electorate.” In The Human Meaning of Social Change, ed. Campbell, Angus and Converse, Philip E.. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1957. “An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems.” World Politics 9:383–400.10.2307/2008920Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1975. “A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5:435–57.10.1017/S0007123400008309Google Scholar
Erber, Ralph, and Lau, Richard R.. 1990. “Political Cynicism Revisited: An Information Processing Reconciliation of Policy-based and Incumbency-based Interpretations of Changes in Trust in Government.” American Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 1983. “The Measurement and Meaning of Trust in Government.” Political Methodology 9:341–54.Google Scholar
Fraser, J. 1970. “The Mistrustful-Efficacious Hypothesis and Political Participation.” Journal of Politics 32:444–49.10.2307/2128662Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1968. Power and Discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Garton Ash, Timothy. 1990. The Magic Lantern: The Revolution of 1989 Witnessed in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin, and Prague. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie. 1985. “Support for the Political System.” British Journal of Political Science 15:127–42.10.1017/S0007123400004129Google Scholar
Gutman, Amy. 1980. Liberal Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Kim Quaile. 1982. “Retest Reliability for Trust in Government and Governmental Responsiveness Measures: A Research Note.” Political Methodology 8:33–47.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Albert O. 1977. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400848515Google Scholar
Hoelter, Jon W. 1983. “The Analysis of Covariance Structures: Goodness-of-fit Indices.” Sociological Methods and Research 11:325–44.10.1177/0049124183011003003Google Scholar
House, James, and Mason, William M.. 1975. “Political Alienation in America, 1952–68.” American Sociological Review 40:123–47.10.2307/2094341Google Scholar
Hyman, Herbert H. 1959. Political Socialization: A Study in the Psychology of Political Behavior. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Herbert H. 1966. “The Value Systems of Different Classes.” In Class, Status, and Power, ed. Bendix, Reinhard and Lipset, Seymour Martin. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1987. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 2d ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Jasso, G. 1980. “A New Theory of Distributive Justice.” American Sociological Review 45:3–32.10.2307/2095239Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent. 1991. “Thinking about Social Injustice.” Political Psychology 12:187–204.10.2307/3791461Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G.. 1974. The Political Character of Adolescence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Daniel, Gutek, Barbara A., Kahn, Robert L., and Barton, Eugenia. 1975. Bureaucratic Encounters. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Kluegel, James R., and Smith, Eliot R.. 1986. Beliefs about Inequality. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1980. “The Structure of Inference.” In The Civic Culture Revisited, ed. Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Lyons, William E., and Lowery, David. 1989. “Citizen Responses to Dissatisfaction in Urban Communities: A Partial Test of a General Model.” Journal of Politics 51:841–68.10.2307/2131537Google Scholar
McPherson, J., Welch, Susan, and Clark, Cal. 1977. “The Stability and Reliability of Political Efficacy: Using Path Analysis To Test Alternative Models.” American Political Science Review 71:509–21.10.2307/1978345Google Scholar
Mason, William M., House, James S., and Martin, Steven S.. 1985. “On the Dimensions of Political Alienation in America.” Sociological Methodology 1985, ed. Tuma, Nancy Brandon. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Matsueda, Ross L., and Bielby, William T.. 1986. “Statistical Power in Covariance Structure Models.” Sociological Methodology 1986, ed. Tuma, Nancy Brandon. Washington: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur. 1974a. “Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970.” American Political Science Review 68:951–72.10.2307/1959140Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur. 1974b. “Rejoinder to Comment by Jack Citrin: Political Discontent or Ritualism? American Political Science Review 68:989–1001.10.2307/1959142Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., Miller, Arthur H., and Schneider, Edward J.. 1980. A National Election Study Data Sourcebook, 1952–1978. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowsky, John, and Ross, Catherine E.. 1990. “The Consolation Prize Theory of Alienation.” American Journal of Sociology 95:1505–35.10.1086/229462Google Scholar
Muller, Edward N., and Jukam, Thomas O.. 1977. “On the Meaning of Political Support.” American Political Science Review 71:1561–95.10.2307/1961496Google Scholar
Orbell, John, and Uno, Toru. 1972. “The Theory of Neighborhood Problem Solving: Political Action Versus Residential Mobility.” American Political Science Review 66:471–89.10.2307/1957792Google Scholar
Paige, J. 1971. “Political Orientation and Riot Participation.” American Sociological Review 36:810–20.10.2307/2093668Google Scholar
Parker, Suzanne Lee. 1986. “The Dynamics of Changing System Support in the United States: 1964–1980.” Ph.D. diss., Florida State University.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1971. “Political Culture, Political Structure, and Political Change.” British Journal of Political Science 1:292–310.10.1017/S0007123400009133Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520340503Google Scholar
Rainwater, Lee. 1974. What Money Buys: Inequality and the Social Meanings of Income. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rasinski, Kenneth A. 1987. “What's Fair Is Fair—or Is It? Value Differences Underlying Public Views about Social Justice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53:201–11.10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.201Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.10.4159/9780674042605Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1974. Rational Legitimacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Morris. 1956. “Misanthropy and Political Ideology.” American Sociological Review 21:690–95.10.2307/2088419Google Scholar
Sears, David O., Hensler, Carl P., and Speer, Leslie K.. 1979. “Whites' Opposition to ‘Busing’: Self-Interest or Symbolic Politics?” American Political Science Review 73:369–84.10.2307/1954885Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Lau, Richard R.. 1983. “Inducing Apparently Self-interested Political Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 27:223–52.10.2307/2111016Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M. 1981. A Question of Loyalty. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Neuman, W. Russell, Citrin, Jack, McClosky, Herbert, and Shanks, J. Merrill. 1975. “Stability of Support for the Political System: The Initial Impact of Watergate.” American Politics Quarterly 3:437–57.10.1177/1532673X7500300406Google Scholar
Sobel, M. E., and Bohrnstedt, G. W.. 1984. “Use of Null Models in Evaluating the Fit of Covariance Structure Models.” In Sociological Methodology 1985, ed. Leinhardt, Samuel. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1962. “Popular Evaluations of Government.” In Ethics and Bigness, ed. Cleveland, H. and Lasswell, Harold. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1988. “Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 103:613–35.10.2307/2150899Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1960. Democracy in America. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1984. “Justice in the Political Arena.” In The Sense of Injustice, ed. Folger, R.. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney. 1980. “On Revisiting the Civic Culture: A Personal Postscript.” In The Civic Culture Revisited, ed. Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney and Nie, Norman H.. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1984. “Economic ‘Stagflation’ and Public Support for the Political System.” British Journal of Political Science 14:187–205.10.1017/S0007123400003525Google Scholar
Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1987. “How Does Government Performance Influence Political Support?” Political Behavior 9:5–28.10.1007/BF00987276Google Scholar
Wheaton, Blair. 1988. “Assessment of Fit in Overidentified Models with Latent Variables.” In Common Problems/Proper Solutions, ed. Long, J. Scott. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Williams, John T. 1985. “Systemic Influences on Political Trust: The Importance of Perceived Institutional Performance.” Political Methodology 11:125–42.Google Scholar
Wright, James D. 1976. “Alienation and Political Negativism from National Surveys.” Sociology and Social Research 60:91–134.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.