Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:46:18.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Logrolling and the Paradox of Voting: Are They Really Logically Equivalent? A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Peter Bernholz
Peter Bernholz*
Affiliation:
Universität Basel, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Vote Trading and the Voting Paradox: A Proof of Logical Equivalence
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , September 1975 , pp. 961 - 962
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Koehler, David H., “Vote-Trading and the Voting Paradox: A Proof of Logical Equivalence,” American Political Science Review, 69 (09, 1975), 954–960 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Bernholz, Peter, “Logrolling, Arrow-Paradox and Decision Rules: A Generalization,” Kyklos, 22 (fasc. 1, 1974), 53 Google Scholar, assumption A5.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.