Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:59:36.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Juristic Theories of Krabbe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

W. W. Willoughby*
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University

Extract

The doctrines of H. Krabbe, professor of public law in the University of Leyden, are to be found in his Die Lehre der Rechtessouveränität, published in 1906, and his Die moderne Staatsidee, the second edition of which appeared in 1919.

The political theory of Krabbe resembles that of Duguit in that it denies law-making power to the state, and recognizes law (as defined by himself) as the ruling power in human society, as sovereign, and, therefore, as above the state. However, as will presently be seen, Krabbe places the state upon a much higher plane than does Duguit. To Duguit, political rulership is nothing more than the bald fact that, in a given community certain persons, for some reason or other, possess and exercise, actual power of control over the actions of the other persons of a group. It is, as it were, an objective fact which cannot, and need not be, ethically justified. To Krabbe, upon the other hand, the state is, in essence, a community of persons unified by the general agreement of its members as to the valuation of public and private interests, and possessing organized instrumentalities for clarifying and formulating these common convictions, and, when necessary, enforcing them. To Krabbe, the state thus plays a necessary part in the declaration and enforcement of law, if not in investing it with essential validity as such.

We find, however, in Krabbe, and also in his translators, as will be later pointed out, that same mistaken idea which is to be discovered in Duguit, that an inquiry into the idealistic or utilitarian validity of law, as determined by its substantive provisions and the purposes sought to be achieved by its enforcement, has a relevancy to, and that its conclusions can affect, the validity and usefulness of the purely formalistic concepts which the positive or analytical jurist employs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This second work has appeared in English dress under the title, “The Modern Idea of the State.” The translators, Professors George H. Sabine and Walter J. Shepard, have increased the value of the volume by adding an extended and luminous note of introduction.

2 The Modern Idea of the State, p. 7.

3 Id., p. 8.

4 Id., p. 39.

5 Id., pp. 47–48.

6 Id., pp. 50–51.

7 Id., p. 51.

8 Id., p. 34.

9 Social Contract, Bk. I, Chap. VI. Krabbe says: “If Rousseau's political theory had been regarded only in the light of its main principles and had not been criticized exclusively with reference to what he borrowed from earlier theories, viz., the explanation of the community and the establishment of its sovereignty by the social contract, there might have been seen in it, what it doubtless contains, the principle of the modern idea of the State” (p. 29).

10 Id., p. 74.

11 Id., p. 75.

12 Duguit, says: “La vérité est que la puissance politique est un fait qui n'a en soi aucun caractère de légitimité ou d'illégitimité.” Manuel de Droit Constitutionnel (1907), p. 36Google Scholar.

13 P. 207. Krabbe, furthermore, does not accept Duguit's doctrine of “solidarity” as an adequate basis for law. He says: “It cannot even be shown as yet that the law can be deduced from solidarity, for solidarity is an abstraction and cannot be recognized as an active principle unless it can be shown that the sense of right is inspired throughout by it.”

14 Id., p. 209.

15 Id., p. 236.

16 Id., p. 245. Krabbe, says: “What is usually called the law of nations is really international constitutional law” (p. 246)Google Scholar.

17 Id., p. 250.

18 Pp. lxx et seq.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.