Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:01:19.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Issues, Economics, and the Dynamics of Multiparty Elections: The British 1987 General Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2000

R. Michael Alvarez ,
Jonathan Nagler  and
Shaun Bowler
R. Michael Alvarez
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Jonathan Nagler
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Shaun Bowler
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We offer a model of multiparty elections that combines voters' retrospective economic evaluations with consideration of parties' issue positions and the issue preferences of voters. We show that both policy issues and the state of the economy matter in British elections. In 1987 voters made a largely retrospective evaluation of the Conservatives based on economic performance; those who rejected the Conservative Party chose between Labour and Alliance based on issue positions. Through simulations we move the parties in the issue space and reestimate vote shares as well as hypothesize an alternative distribution of views on the economy, and we show that Labour had virtually no chance to win with a centrist party as a viable alternative. The predictions from our 1987 simulations are supported in an analysis of the 1992 British election. We argue for multinomial probit in studying three-party elections because it allows for a richer formulation of politics than do competing methods.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 94 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 131 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., Paolino, Phil, and Rohde, David W.. 1992. “‘Sophisticated Voting’ in the 1988 Presidential Primaries.” American Political Science Review 86 (03): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto. 1987. “Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-party System as a Repeated Game.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (3): 651–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1960. “Introduction: A Functional Approach to Comparative Politics.” In The Politics of the Developing Areas, ed. Almond, Gabriel A. and Coleman, James S.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Pp. 3–64.Google Scholar
Alt, James E. 1979. The Politics of Economic Decline. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alt, James E. 1985. “Party Strategies, World Demand, and Unemployment: Domestic and International Sources of Economic Activity.” American Political Science Review 70 (12): 1016–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael. 1998. Information and Elections, Revised to Include the 1996 Presidential Election. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, Garrett, Geoffrey, and Lange, Peter. 1991. “Government Partisanship, Labour Organization and Macroeconomic Performance.” American Political Science Review 85 (06): 539–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1995. “Economics, Issues and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 714–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998a. “When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998b. “Economics, Entitlements, and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 1349–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. N.d. “A New Approach for Modeling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections.” British Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano, and Mair, Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Jerome H. 1978. “The Multicandidate Calculus of Voting: Application to Canadian Federal Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (3): 609–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David, and Kavanagh, Dennis. 1988. British General Election of 1987. New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce E. 1978. “Strategic Voting in Britain.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (1): 639–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold, Mishler, William, and Whitely, Paul. 1990. “Recapturing the Falklands—Models of Conservative Popularity, 1979–83.” British Journal of Political Science 20 (1): 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold, and Stewart, Marianne C.. 1984. “Dealignment of Degree: Political Change in Britain, 1974–83.” Journal of Politics 46 (3): 689–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., and Whitely, Paul. 1990. “Perceptions of Macroeconomic Performance, Government Support and Conservative Party Strategy in Britain 1983–87.” European Journal of Political Research 18: 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, Ivor. 1974. “Do Butler and Stokes Really Explain Political Change in Britain?” European Journal of Political Research 2 (03): 183–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, Ivor. 1992. “The 1987 General Election.” In Issues and Controversies in British Electoral Behavior, ed. Denver, David and Hands, Gordon. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Pp. 343–54.Google Scholar
Crewe, Ivor, Sarlvik, Bo, and Alt, James. 1977. “Partisan Dealignment in Britain, 1964–1974.” British Journal of Political Science 1 (2): 129–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, James K. 1997. “Voter Choice and Strategies in French Presidential Elections.” Presented at the annual meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Epstein, Leon D. 1967. Political Parties in Western Democracies. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark N., Niemi, Richard G., and Whitten, Guy. 1994. “The Two Faces of Tactical Voting.” British Journal of Political Science 24 (3): 549–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, John W., and Rae, Nicol C.. 1989. “A Test of the Importance of Tactical Voting: Great Britain, 1987.” British Journal of Political Science 19 (1): 126–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1992. “The Political Consequences of Thatcherism.” Political Behavior 14 (4): 361–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrop, Martin. 1990. “Political Marketting.” Parliamentary Affairs 43 (3): 88–112.Google Scholar
Hausman, Jerry A., and Wise, David A.. 1978. “A Conditional Probit Model for Qualitative Choice: Discrete Decisions Recognizing Interdependence and Heterogeneous Preferences.” Econometrica 46 (2): 403–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Anthony, Jowell, Roger, and Curtice, John. 1985. How Britain Votes. New York Pergamon.Google Scholar
Heath, Anthony, Jowell, Roger, and Curtice, John. 1989. British Election Study, 1987. A Computer File. Colchester: ESRC Data Archive (distributor).Google Scholar
Heath, Anthony, John Curtice, Roger Jewell, Geoff Evans, Julia Field, and Witherspoon, Sharon. 1991. Understanding Political Change: The British Voter 1964–1987. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell, John Curtice, Brand, Jack, and Mitchell, James. 1996. British General Election Cross-Section Survey, 1992 [computer file] (Study #6453). ICPSR version. London, England: Social and Community Planning Research [producer], 1992. Colchester, UK: ESRC Data Archive/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], 1996.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy.” American Political Science Review 71 (12): 1467–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, King, Gary, Scheve, Kenneth, and Singh, Naunihal. 1999. Amelia: A Program for Missing Data (Gauss Version). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, http://Gking.Harvard.edu/.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. J., and Pattie, C. J.. 1991. “Tactical Voting in Great Britain in 1983 and 1987: An Alternative Approach.” British Journal of Political Science 21 (1): 95–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. New York: Vintage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth. 1998. “Listwise Deletion Is Evil: What to Do About Missing Data in Political Science.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Lacy, Dean, and Burden, Barry C.. 1999. “The Vote-Stealing and Turnout Effects of Ross Perot in the 1992 U.S. Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (1): 233–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Eric D. 1997. “A Simulated Maximum Likelihood Application to the 1998 Democratic Primary.” Presented at the annual meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1988. Economics and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Little, J. Rodrick, and Rubin, Donald. 1987. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
McAllister, Ian, and Mughan, Anthony. 1987. “Class, Attitudes and Electoral Politics in Britain, 1974–1983.” Comparative Political Studies 20 (1): 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, Ian, and Studlar, Donley T.. 1992. “Region and Voting in Britain, 1979–87: Territorial Polarization or Artifact?” American Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 168–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFadden, Daniel. 1973. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zarembka, Paul. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 105–42.Google Scholar
McFadden, Daniel. 1978. “Modeling the Choice of Residential Location.” In Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location, ed. Karlqvist, Anders, Lundquist, L., Weibull, J., and Snickars, Folke. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Pp. 75–96.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1972. “A General Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” In Mathematical Applications in Political Science, vol. 6, ed. Herndon, J. F. and Bernd, Joseph Lawrence. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press. Pp. 32–78.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, Hoskin, Marilyn, and Fitzgerald, Roy. 1989. “British Parties in the Balance: A Time-Series Analysis of Long-term Trends in Labour and Conservative Support.” British Journal of Political Science 19 (2): 211–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Whitten, Guy, and Franklin, Mark N.. 1992. “Constituency Characteristics, Individual Characteristics, and Tactical Voting in the 1987 British General Election.” British Journal of Political Science 22 (2): 299–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I. 1978. Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 1981. “Party Systems and Political System Performance in Contemporary Democracies.” American Political Science Review 75 (12): 861–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 1982. Contemporary Democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Simon, and Sanders, David. 1993. “Modeling Government Popularity in Postware Britain—A Methodological Example.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Kevin M., Martin, Andrew D., and Whitford, Andrew B.. 1999. “Voter Choice in Multiparty Democracies: A Test of Competing Theories and Models.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 1231–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62 (06): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Donald. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, David. 1996. “New Labour, New Machiavelli—A Cynic's Guide to Economic Policy.” Political Quarterly 67 (10–12): 290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarlvik, Bo, and Crewe, Ivor. 1983. Decade of Dealignment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, Joseph L. 1997. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Norman, Martin, Andrew D., Quinn, Kevin M., and Whitford, Andrew B.. 1998. “Multiparty Electoral Competition in the Netherlands and Germany: A Model Based on Multinomial Probit.” Public Choice 97 (3): 257–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Eric. 1994. The Rise and Fall of the Labour Left. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Shaw, Eric. 1996. The Labour Party Since 1945: Old Labour—New Labour. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1972. “The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition.” American Political Science Review 66 (06): 555–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Marianne C., and Clarke, Harold D.. 1992. “The (Un)Importance of Party Leaders—Leader Images and Party Choice in the 1987 British Election.” Journal of Politics 54 (2): 447–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studlar, Donley T., McAllister, Ian, and Ascui, Alvaro. 1990. “Privatization and the British Electorate: Microeconomic Policies, Macroeconomic Evaluations, and Party Support.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 1077–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitten, Guy D., and Palmer, Harvey D.. 1996. “Heightening Comparativists' Concern for Model Choice: Voting Behavior in Great Britain and the Netherlands.” Mmerican Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 231–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wring, Dominic. 1996. “From Mass Propaganda to Political Marketing: The Transformation of Labour Party Election Campaigning.” In British Elections and Parties Yearbook 1995, ed. Railings, Colin, Farrel, David, Denver, David, and Broughton, David. London: Frank Cass. Pp. 105–14.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.