Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:04:56.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Work Special? Justice and the Distribution of Employment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Richard J. Arneson
Richard J. Arneson*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I investigate from an egalitarian welfarist standpoint the issue of whether state-guaranteed employment should be offered as a matter of right to able-bodied poor citizens who suffer chronic or persistent unemployment. An affirmative answer is defended. One consideration supporting this right to work is that provision of transfer aid in the form of jobs rather than cash screens “nonneedy bohemians” from the class of beneficiaries. The main conclusion of the essay is defended from one objection based on efficiency wage models of the labor market and from another based on the alleged impossibility of maintaining the self-respect and self-esteem of able-bodied individuals who fail to earn their own keep independently in a market economy.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 84 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 1127 - 1147
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, George A. 1982. “Labor Contracts As Partial Gift Exchange.” Quarterly Journal of Economies 97:543–69.Google Scholar
Akerlof, George A. 1984. “Gift-Exchange and Efficiency-Wage Theory: Four Views.” American Economic Review 74:79–83.Google Scholar
Akerlof, George A., and Katz, Lawrence. 1989. “Workers' Trust Funds and the Logic of Wage Profiles.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104:525–36.Google Scholar
Akerlof, George A., and Yellen, Janet L.. 1986. Efficiency Wage Models of the Lahor Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. 1989. “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophical Studies 56:77–93.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. 1990a. “Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19:158–94.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. 1990b. “Primary Goods Reconsidered.” Nous 24:429–54.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. 1990c. “Neutrality and Utility.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20:215–40.Google Scholar
Bulow, Jeremy, and Summers, Lawrence H.. 1986. “A Theory of Dual Labor Markets with Application to Industrial Policy, Discrimination, and Keynesian Unemployment.” Journal of Labor Economics 4:376–414.Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael. 1979. Manufacturing Consent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carmichael, Lome. 1985. “Can Unemployment Be Involuntary? Comment.” American Economic Review 75:1213–14.Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald A. 1989. “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99:906–44.Google Scholar
Dickens, William T., and Lang, Kevin. 1985. “A Test of Dual Labor Market Theory.” American Economic Review 75:792–805.Google Scholar
Doeringer, Peter B., and Piore, Michael J.. 1971. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Dunlop, John. 1957. “The Task of Contemporary Wage Theory.” In The Theory of Wage Determination, ed. Dunlop, John. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Ellwood, David T. 1988. Poor Support: Poverty in the American Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1988. “Is There (or Should There Be) a Right to Work?” In Democracy and the Welfare State, ed. Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Helen. 1983. Full Employment and Public Policy: The United States and Sweden. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Katz Lawrence, F. 1986. “Efficiency Wage Theories; A Partial Evaluation.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1:235–76.Google Scholar
Kelvin, Peter, and Jarrett, Joanna E.. 1985. Unemployment: Its Social Psychological Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander. 1986. Out of Work: The First Century of Unemployment in Massachusetts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kniesser, Thomas J., and Goldsmith, Arthur H.. 1987. “A Survey of Alternate Models of the Aggregate U.S. Labor Market.” Journal of Economic Literature 25:1241–80.Google Scholar
Kohn, Melvin. 1976. “Occupational Structure and Alienation.” American Journal of Sociology 82:111–30.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, Assar, and Snower, Dennis J.. 1988. The Insider-Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moon, J. Donald. 1988. “The Moral Basis of the Democratic Welfare State.” In Democracy and the Welfare State, ed. Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl, and Stiglitz, Joseph E.. 1984. “Equilibrium Unemployment As a Worker Discipline Device.” American Economic Review 73:433–44.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl, and Stiglitz, Joseph E.. 1985. “Can Unemployment Be Involuntary? Reply.” American Economic Review 75:892–93.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Peter. 1987. Unemployment: Economic Theory and Evidence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1909. The Man Versus the State. London: Watts & Co.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 1987. “The Causes and Consequences of the Dependence of Quality on Price.” Journal of Economic Literature 25:1–48.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Weiss, Andrew. 1983. “Incentive Effects of Terminations: Applications to the Credit and Labor Markets.” American Review 73:912–27.Google Scholar
Thurow, Lester C. 1976. “Government Expenditures; Cash, or In-Kind Aid?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 5:361–81.Google Scholar
Van Der Ween, Robert, and Parijs, Philippe Van. 1986. “A Capitalist Road to Communism.” Theory and Society 15:635–55.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe. 1990. “The Second Marriage of Justice and Efficiency.” Journal of Social Policy 19:1–25.Google Scholar
Weirich, Paul. 1983. “Utility Tempered with Equality.” Nous 17:423–39.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.