Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2013
When the United States last year became a member of the International Labor Organization, many people deplored the decision as being the first covert step toward full membership in the League of Nations. Those whose outlook was more sympathetic to international cooperation replied, in defense, that the Labor Organization is independent of the League, having its own buildings, its own separate organs, its own secretariat, and so on; that its membership is not identical with that of the League; and that therefore a state, by becoming a member of the Labor Organization assumed no connection whatever with the League.
1 For an account of how the Assembly accomplished this, see Records, First Assembly, Meetings of Fourth Committee.
2 Records, First Assembly, Minutes of Fourth Committee, pp. 23–30.
3 Records, First Assembly, Plenary Meetings, p. 700.
4 Ibid., Minutes of Fourth Committee, pp. 48–63.
5 what, also, of those states members of the I.L.O., who are not members of the League, and also have no representation on the Governing Body?
6 Official Journal, Special Supplement 67, pp. 17–25, 76–82Google Scholar.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.