Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:59:14.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Illusion of Power and the Disruption of Moral Norms: Thucydides' Critique of Periclean Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

S. Sara Monoson  and
Michael Loriaux
S. Sara Monoson
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Michael Loriaux
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholars in both international relations and political theory have been turning their attention to Thucydides with increasing frequency but with dissimilar questions. We draw on both traditions of inquiry to reexamine Thucydides' view of Pericles. We argue that antithetical reasoning is present in the treatment of Pericles and is manifested in the opposition between the statesman's brilliance and the infelicitous consequences of his statecraft, as become evident in the work as a whole. This antithesis undermines the claim advanced by certain figures in the History, as well as by contemporary realists, that states (statesmen) should not be held to the same moral standards as individuals because to do so subverts their capacity to conduct prudent policy. We propose that Thucydides' work suggests, instead, that it is precisely when the norms of moral conduct are disrupted that states and individuals find it next to impossible to chart a prudent course of action.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 285 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aron, Raymond. 1978. “Thucydides and the Historical Narrative.” In Politics in History: Selected Essays of Raymond Aron, ed. Conant, Miriam Bernheim. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bagby, Laurie M. Johnson. 1994. “The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations.” International Organization 48(Winter):131–53.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 1979. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, E. H. 1964. The Twenty Years Crisis. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Cawkwell, George. 1997. Thucydides and the Peloponnesian War. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marshall. 1985. “Moral Skepticism and International Relations.” In International Ethics, ed. Beitz, Charles R.et al.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Connor, W. Robert. 1977a. “A Post Modernist Thucydides?” The Classical Journal 72(4):289–98.Google Scholar
Connor, W. Robert. 1977b. “Tyrannis Polis.” In Ancient and Modern: Essays in Honor of Gerald F. Else, ed. D'Arms, John and Eadie, John W.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Connor, W. Robert. 1984. Thucydides. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Connor, W. Robert. 1991. “Polarization in Thucydides.” In Hegemonic Rivalry: From Thucydides to the Nuclear Age, ed. Lebow, Richard Ned and Strauss, Barry. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1907. Thucydides Mythistoricus. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Dougherty, James E., and Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. Jr. 1990. Contending Theories of International Relations. 3d ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael. 1991. “Thucydides: A Realist?” In Hegemonic Rivalry: From Thucydides to the Nuclear Age, ed. Lebow, Richard Ned and Strauss, Barry. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Ducrey, Pierre. 1986. Warfare in Ancient Greece. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Edmunds, Lowell. 1975. Chance and Intelligence in Thucydides. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Euben, J. Peter. 1990. The Tragedy of Political Theory: The Road Not Taken. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Farrar, Cynthia. 1988. Origins of Democratic Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farrar, Cynthia. 1993. “‘Gyges’ Ring: Reflections on the Boundaries of Democratic Citizenship.” Paper delivered at the Colloque International: Démocratic Athénienne et Culture. Sponsored by UNESCO and the Academy of Athens.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finley, John H. 1942. Thucydides. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forde, Steven. 1995. “International Realism and the Science of Politics: Thucydides, Machiavelli, and Neorealism.” International Studies Quarterly 39(2):141–61.Google Scholar
Garst, Daniel. 1989. “Thucydides and Neorealism.” International Studies Quarterly 33(1):3–27.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon. 1987. “The Great Dionysia and Civic Ideology.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 107:58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomme, A. W. 1945–1981. A Historical Commentary on Thucydides. Revised by Andrewes, A. and Dover, K. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grene, David, ed. 1989. The Peloponnesian War: Thucydides. The Complete Hobbes Translation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hornblower, Simon. 1987. Thucydides. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Virginia. 1973. Thucydides: The Artful Reporter. Toronto: Hackert.Google Scholar
Hussey, Edward. 1985. “Thucydidean History and Democritean Theory.” In CRUX: Essays in Greek History presented to G. E. M. de Ste. Croix on his 75th Birthday, ed. Cartledge, P. A. and Harvey, F. D.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Kagan, Donald. 1989. The Outbreak of the Peloponnesian War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, Donald. 1991. Pericles of Athens and the Birth of Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kauppi, Mark V. 1991. “Contemporary International Relations Theory and the Peloponnesian War.” In Hegemonic Rivalry: From Thucydides to the Nuclear Age, ed. Lebow, Richard Ned and Strauss, Barry. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie. 1995. Norms in International Relations: the Struggle Against Apartheid. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1981. The Humean Perspective on International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Center of International Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kurke, Leslie. 1991. The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetry of Social Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 1991. “Thucydides, Power Transition Theory, and the Causes of War.” In Hegemonic Rivalry: From Thucydides to the Nuclear Age, ed. Lebow, Richard Ned and Strauss, Barry. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Loriaux, Michael. 1992. “The Realists and Saint Augustine: Skepticism, Psychology, and Moral Action in International Relations Thought.” International Studies Quarterly 36(4):401–20.Google Scholar
Lynch, Cecelia. N.d. Beyond Appeasement: Interpreting Interwar Peace Movements in World Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Millet, Paul. 1991. Lending and Borrowing in Ancient Athens. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Monoson, S. Sara. 1994. “Citizen as Erastes: Erotic Imagery and The Idea of Reciprocity in the Periclean Funeral Oration.” Political Theory 22(2):253–76.Google Scholar
Monoson, S. Sara. N.d. Plato's Democratic Entanglements. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans. 1946. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry. 1983. Law, Morality, and the Relations of States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. 1989. Man and Elite in Democratic Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. 1991. “National Ideology and Strategic Defense of the Population, from Athens to Star Wars.” In Hegemonic Rivalry: Thucydides to the Nuclear Age, ed. Lebow, Richard Ned and Strauss, Barry. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. 1993. “Thucydides' Criticism of Democratic Knowledge.” In Nomodeiktes: Greek Studies in Honor of Martin Ostwald, ed. Rosen, Ralph and Farrell, Joseph. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Orwin, Clifford. 1984. “The Just and the Advantageous in Thucydides: The Case of the Mytilenian Debate.” American Political Science Review 78(2):485–94.Google Scholar
Orwin, Clifford. 1994. The Humanity of Thucydides. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Michael. 1992. Love of Glory and the Common Good: Aspects of the Political Thought of Thucydides. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Parry, Adam. 1969. “The Language of Thucydides' Description of the Plague.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, London 16:106–18.Google Scholar
Perlman, Shalom. 1991. “Hegemony and Arkhē in Greece: Fourth Century B.C. Views.” In Hegemonic Rivalry: From Thucydides to the Nuclear Age, ed. Lebow, Richard Ned and Strauss, Barry. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Pouncey, Peter R. 1980. The Necessities of War: A Study of Thucydides' Pessimism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Romilly, Jacqueline de, 1988. Les grands sophistes dans l'Athènes de Pericles. Paris: Fallois.Google Scholar
Ste. Croix, G. E. M. de, 1972. The Origins of the Peloponnesian War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Arlene. 1996. Athenian Democracy: Modem Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Seaford, Richard. 1994. Reciprocity and Ritual. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strassler, Robert B., ed. 1996. The Landmark Thucydides. A Newly Revised Edition of the Crawley Translation with Maps, Annotations, Appendices and Encyclopedic Index. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It.” International Organization 46(2):391–425.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd. 1984. When Words Lose Their Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1960. “Why Is There No International Theory?” International Relations 2(April):35–64.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. 1985. “The Ephebes Song: Tragoidia and Polis.” Representations 11:26–62.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.