Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T12:52:15.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Electoral Quotas Work after They Are Withdrawn? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2009

RIKHIL R. BHAVNANI
RIKHIL R. BHAVNANI*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
*
Rikhil R. Bhavnani is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Encina Hall West, Room 100, Stanford, CA 94305 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do electoral quotas for women alter women's chances of winning elections after they are withdrawn? I answer this question by examining an unusual natural experiment in India in which randomly chosen seats in local legislatures are set aside for women for one election at a time. Using data from Mumbai, I find that the probability of a woman winning office conditional on the constituency being reserved for women in the previous election is approximately five times the probability of a woman winning office if the constituency had not been reserved for women. I also explore tentative evidence on the mechanisms by which reservations affect women's ability to win elections. The data suggest that reservations work in part by introducing into politics women who are able to win elections after reservations are withdrawn and by allowing parties to learn that women can win elections.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 23 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alt, James. 1994. “The Impact of the Voting Rights Act on Black and White Voter Registration in the South.” In Quiet Revolution in the South, ed. Davidson, C. and Grofman, B.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ban, Radu, and Rao, Vijayendra. 2008. “Tokenism or Agency? The Impact of Women's Reservations on Village Democracies in South India.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 56: 501–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardhan, Pranab, Mookherjee, Dilip, and Torrado, Monica Parra. 2005. “Impact of Reservations of Panchayat Pradhans on Targeting in West Bengal.” BREAD Working Paper.Google Scholar
Barry, Jim, Honour, Trudie, and Palnitkar, Sneha. 2004. “Social Movement, Action and Change: The Influence of Women's Movements on City Government in Mumbai and London.” Gender, Work and Organization 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaman, Lori, Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini, and Topalova, Petia. 2008. “Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Prejudice?” Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1957. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles, Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1996. “Do Majority–Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?” American Political Science Review 90: 794–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, and Duflo, Esther. 2003. “The Impact of Reservation in the Panchayati Raj: Evidence from a Nationwide Randomized Experiment.” Paper.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, and Duflo, Esther. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72: 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep. 1999. Democracy Without Associations: Transformation of the Party System and Social Cleavages in India. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep. 2002. “Why Are Some Women Politically Active? The Household, Public Space, and Political Participation in India.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 43: 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clingingsmith, David, Khwaja, Asim Ijaz, and Kremer, Michael. 2009. “Estimating the Impact of the Hajj: Religion and Tolerance in Islam's Global Gathering.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1992. When Incumbency Fails: The Senate Career of Mark Andrews. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48: 264–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghatak, Maitreesh, and Ghatak, Maitreya. 2002. “Recent Reforms in the Panchayat System in West Bengal.” Economic and Political Weekly 37 (1): 45–58.Google Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan L. 2001. “White Residents, Black Incumbents, and a Declining Racial Divide.” American Political Science Review 95: 603–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honour, Trudie, Barry, Jim, and Palnitkar, Sneha. 1999. “The Quota Innovation, Gender and Indian Politics: Experience and Prospects.” Equal Opportunities International 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jha, Shree Nagesh, and Mathur, P. C.. 1999. Decentralization and Local Politics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide.” Politics and Gender 2: 303–327.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Linden, Leigh L. 2004. “Are Incumbents Really Advantaged? Exploring the Preference for Non-Incumbents in India. Job Market Paper, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lublin, David, and Voss, D. Stephen. 2003. “The Missing Middle: Why Median-Voter Theory Can't Save Democrats from Singing the Boll-Weevil Blues.” The Journal of Politics 65: 227–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, Gerry. 1996. “Ending Footbinding and Infibulation: A Convention Account.” American Sociological Review 61: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2005. “Quota Problems: Combating the Dangers of Essentialism.” Politics and Gender 1 (4): 622–38.Google Scholar
McKenzie, David, Gibson, John, and Stillman, Steven. 2006. “How Important is Selection? Experimental versus Non-Experimental Measures of Income Gains from Migration.” World Bank Working Paper 3906, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Naik, Yogesh, and Lokhande, Deepak. 2001. “Women, OBCs in, 20 Corporators Out in BMC Polls.” Mid-Day November 15.Google Scholar
Pande, Rohini. 2003. “Can Mandated Political Representation Increase Policy Influence for Disadvantaged Minorities? Theory and Evidence from India.” American Economic Review 93: 1132–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. “Do Parties Know That ‘Women Win’? Party Leader Beliefs about Women's Electoral Chances.” Politics and Gender 2: 431–50.Google Scholar
Sankaran, Kamala, ed. 1992. Women in Politics: Forms and Processes. New Delhi: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
Sen, Samita. 2000. “Toward a Feminist Politics? The Indian Women's Movement in Historical Perspective.” In Policy Research Report on Gender and Development Working Paper Series No. 9. World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Shotts, Kenneth. 2003. “Does Racial Redistricting Cause Conservative Policy Outcomes? Policy Preferences of Southern Representatives in the 1980s and 1990s.” The Journal of Politics 65: 216–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Mahendra Prasad. 2003. India at the Polls: Parliamentary Elections in the Federal Phase. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Singh, Seema. 2003. Panchayati Raj and Women Empowerment. New Delhi: Ocean Books.Google Scholar
Uppal, Yogesh. 2005. “The Disadvantaged Incumbents: Estimating Incumbency Effects in Indian State Legislatures.” Paper, Youngstown State University.Google Scholar
Weiner, Myron. 1978. Sons of the Soil: Migration and Ethnic Conflict in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Steven Ian. 2000. “India, Consociational Theory, and Ethnic Violence.” Asian Survey 40: 767–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorn, Christopher. 2005. “A Solution to Separation in Binary Response Models.” Political Analysis 13: 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.