Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:17:51.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Civility, Enlightenment, and Society: Conceptual Confusions and Kantian Remedies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

James Schmidt
James Schmidt*
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Critics of what is called the “Enlightenment project” have argued that it has been responsible for a number of current social pathologies. At the same time, the term “civil society” has been used to designate those patterns of solidarity that the Enlightenment project allegedly disrupts. This article (1) argues that characterizations of the Enlightenment project tend to be elusive and historically questionable, (2) suggests that the concept of civil society is ambiguous in both its object and its intent, (3) explores how Kant provided a more rigorous account of the relationship between enlightenment and civil society, an account which rests on a contrast between civil and cosmopolitan society, and (4) considers some of the difficulties that plague attempts to define “civility” as a virtue.

Type
Forum
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 419 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arato, Andrew, and Cohen, Jean. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Neuhaus, Richard John. [1976] 1996. To Empower People: From State to Civil Society. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. [1790] 1987. Reflections on the Revolution in France, ed. Pocock, J. G. A.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Coats, Dan. 1996. “Can Congress Revive Civil Society?” Policy Review 75(January–February):25–8.Google Scholar
Dionne, E. J. 1997. “Why Civil Society? Why Now?” Brookings Review 15(Fall):4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N., ed. 1992. Democracy and Modernity. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish, trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1984. “What Is Enlightenment?” In The Foucault Reader, ed. Rabinow, Paul. New York: Pantheon Books. Pp. 32–50.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. [1960] 1989. Truth and Method. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernst. 1996. Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gray, John. 1995. Enlightenment's Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, trans. Lawrence, Frederick. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms, trans. Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hann, Chris, and Dunn, Elizabeth, eds. 1996. Civil Society: Challenging Western Models. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. [1806[ 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. 1947. Eclipse of Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. 1996. Briefwechsel 1941–1948. Vol. 17 of Gesammelte Schriften. Frankfurt: Fischer.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor. [1947] 1972. Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. Cumming, John. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1781] 1929. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, Norman Kemp. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1784] 1923. Abhandlungen nach 1781. Vol. 8 of Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1793] 1960. Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, trans. Greene, Theodore M. and Hudson, Hoyt H.. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1797] 1907. Metaphysik der Sitten. Vol. 6 of Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Kumar, Krishan. 1993. “Civil Society: An Inquiry into the Usefulness of an Historical Term.” British Journal of Sociology 44(September): 375–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1845] 1975. The German Ideology. Vol. 5 of Collected Works. New York: International.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1859] 1970. Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. [1878] 1986. Human, All Too Human, trans. Hollingdale, R. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. [1882] 1974. The Gay Science, trans. Kaufmann, Walter. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. [1883–1888] 1968a. Will to Power, trans. Kaufmann, Walter and Hollingdale, R. J.. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. [1888] 1968b. Twilight of the Idols, trans. Hollingdale, R. J.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. [1962] 1991. Rationalism in Politics. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 1989. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 1990. “Enlightenment as Autonomy: Kant's Vindication of Reason.” In The Enlightenment and Its Shadows, ed. Jordanova, Ludmilla and Hulme, Peter. London and New York: Routledge. Pp. 184–99.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 1996. Towards Justice and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Outram, Dorina. 1995. The Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6(January):65–78.Google Scholar
Schleifer, James T. 1980. The Making of Tocqueville's Democracy in America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, James. 1982. “Paideia for the ‘Bürger als Bourgeois’: The Concept of ‘Civil Society’ in Hegel's Political Thought.” History of Political Thought 2(Winter):469–93.Google Scholar
Schmidt, James. 1986. “A Raven with a Halo: The Translation of Aristotle's Politics.” History of Political Thought 7(Summer):295–319.Google Scholar
Schmidt, James. 1989. “Kant, Mendelssohn, and the Question of Enlightenment.” Journal of the History of Ideas 50(April–June): 269–92.Google Scholar
Schmidt, James. 1995. “Civil Society and Social Things: Setting the Boundaries of the Social Sciences.” Social Research 62(Winter): 899–932.Google Scholar
Schmidt, James, ed. 1996. What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, James. 1998. “Cabbage Heads and Gulps of Water: Hegel on the Terror.” Political Theory 26(February):4–32.Google Scholar
Schmidt, James, and Wartenberg, Thomas. 1994. “Foucault's Enlightenment.” In Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate, ed. Kelley, Michael. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. 283–314.Google Scholar
Schwedler, Jillian, ed. 1995. Toward Civil Society in the Middle East? Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Seligman, Adam B. 1992. The Idea of Civil Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward. 1992. “The Virtue of Civil Society.” Government and Opposition 26(Winter):3–20.Google Scholar
Stein, Lorenz von. [1850] 1964. The History of the Social Movement in France, 1789–1850, trans. Mengelberg, Kaethe. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. [1856] 1955. The Old Régime and the French Revolution, trans. Gilbert, Stuart. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1991. “The Idea of Civil Society.” Dissent 38(Spring):294–98.Google Scholar
West, Cornel. 1979. “Introduction.” Union Seminary Quarterly Review 34(Winter):67–70.Google Scholar
Wilson, Neil. 1987. “Punching Out the Enlightenment: A Discussion of Peter Sloterdijk's Kritik der zynischen Vernunft.” New German Critique 41(Spring–Summer):53–70.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.