Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:19:38.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building the Chicago School

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2006

MICHAEL T. HEANEY  and
JOHN MARK HANSEN
MICHAEL T. HEANEY
Affiliation:
University of Florida
JOHN MARK HANSEN
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Chicago School of Political Science, which emerged at the University of Chicago in the 1920s and 1930s, is widely known for its reconception of the study of politics as a scientific endeavor on the model of the natural sciences. Less attention has been devoted to the genesis of the school itself. In this article, we examine the scientific vision, faculty, curriculum, and supporting institutions of the Chicago School. The creation of the Chicago School, we find, required the construction of a faculty committed to its vision of the science of politics, the muster of resources to support efforts in research and education, and the formation of curriculum to educate students in its precepts and methods. Its success as an intellectual endeavor, we argue, depended not only on the articulation of the intellectual goals but also, crucially, on the confluence of disciplinary receptiveness, institutional opportunity, and entrepreneurial talent in support of a science of politics.

Type
“THE EVOLUTION OF POLITICAL SCIENCE” ESSAYS
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 100 , Issue 4 , November 2006 , pp. 589 - 596
Copyright
© 2006 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott Andrew. 1999. Department & Discipline. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Almond Gabriel A. 1991. “Charles Edward Merriam.” In Remembering the University of Chicago, Edward Shils, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Almond Gabriel A. 2004. “Who Lost the Chicago School of Political Science?” Perspectives on Politics 2 (March): 91– 93.Google Scholar
Annual Report of the Political Science Department, University of Chicago. 1926–1940. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ashmore Harry S. 1989. Unseasonable Truths: The Life of Robert Maynard Hutchins. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Beard Charles A. 1927. “Time, Technology, and the Creative Spirit in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 21 (February): 1– 11.Google Scholar
Berle A. A. Jr., and Gardiner C. Means. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Chicago: Commerce Clearing House.
Bishop Charles C. 1987. “Teaching at Johns Hopkins: The First Generation.” History of Education Quarterly 27 (Winter): 499– 515.Google Scholar
Board of Trustees. 1923. Minutes 13 (January 19). Chicago: Special Collections, University of Chicago.
Borgatti Stephen P., Martin G. Everett, and Linton C. Freeman. 2002. Ucinet 6 for Windows. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Bulmer Martin. 1980. “The Early Institutional Establishment of Social Science Research.” Minerva 18 (March): 51– 110.Google Scholar
Campbell Angus Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Columbia University. 1897–1940. Bulletin of Information. New York: Columbia University.
Department of Political Science. 1920–1940. Graduate Student Transcripts. Chicago: Departmental Archive, University of Chicago.
Department of Political Science. 1925. Political Theory. Box 117, Folder 7. Chicago: Charles E. Merriam Collection, Special Collections, University of Chicago.
Dewey John. 1927. The Public and its Problems. New York: H. Holt.
Gaus John M., Leonard D. White, and Marshall E. Dimock. 1936. The Frontiers of Public Administration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gosnell Harold F. 1927. Getting Out the Vote. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gosnell Harold F. 1930. Why Europe Votes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gosnell Harold F. 1935. Negro Politicians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gosnell Harold F. 1937. Machine Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hall Arnold B. 1926. “Report of the Third National Conference on the Science of Politics.” American Political Science Review 20 (February): 124– 26.Google Scholar
Hansen John Mark. 1997. “In Memoriam: Harold F. Gosnell.” PS: Political Science and Politics 30 (September): 582– 87.Google Scholar
Harvard University. 1900–1940. Courses of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Johns Hopkins University. 1900–1911. University Circulars. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
Johns Hopkins University. 1912–1940. University Register. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
Karl Barry D. 1974. Charles E. Merriam and the Study of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lasswell Harold D. 1927. Propaganda Technique in the World War. New York: A.A. Knopf.
Lasswell Harold D. 1930. Psychopathology and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lasswell Harold D. 1935. World Politics and Personal Insecurity. New York: McGraw–Hill.
Lasswell Harold D. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: McGraw–Hill.
Lazarsfeld Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1944. The People's Choice. New York: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce.
Lowell A. Lawrence. 1910. “The Physiology of Politics.” American Political Science Review 4 (February): 1– 15.Google Scholar
Merriam Charles E. 1921. “The Present State of the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 15 (May): 173– 85.Google Scholar
Merriam Charles E. 1923. The American Party System. New York: MacMillian.
Merriam Charles E. 1925. New Aspects of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merriam Charles E. 1926. “Progress in Political Research.” American Political Science Review 20 (February): 1– 13.Google Scholar
Merriam Charles E. 1929. Chicago: A More Intimate View of Urban Politics. New York: MacMillan.
Merriam Charles E., and Harold F. Gosnell. 1924. Non-Voting: Causes and Methods of Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Monroe Kristin Renwick. 2004. “The Chicago School: Forgotten but Not Gone.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (March): 95– 98.Google Scholar
Neblo Michael. 2004. “Giving Hands and Feet to Morality.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (March): 99– 100.Google Scholar
Oren Ido. 2003. Our Enemies and Us. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ranney Austin. 1974. “The Committee on Political Behavior, 1949–64, and the Committee on Governmental and Legal Processes, 1964–72.” Items: Newsletter of the Social Science Research Council 28 (September): 37– 41.Google Scholar
Ross Dorothy. 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rosten Leo. 1991. “Harold D. Lasswell.” In Remembering the University of Chicago, ed. Edward Shils. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Simon Herbert A. 1985. Charles E. Merriam and the “Chicago School” of Political Science. Urbana, IL: Department of Political Science, University of Illinois.
Somit Albert, and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1967. The Development of Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Thurstone L. L. 1928. “Attitudes Can Be Measured.” American Journal of Sociology 33 (January): 529– 54.Google Scholar
Tsou Tang. 1951. “A Study of the Development of the Scientific Approach in Political Studies in the United States.” Ph.D. diss. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
University of Chicago. 1893–1953. Annual Register. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
White Leonard D. 1929. The Prestige Value of Public Employment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
White Leonard D., ed. 1942. The Future of Government in the United States: Essays in Honor of Charles E. Merriam. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wooddy Carroll. 1926. The Chicago Primary of 1926. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Worcester Kenton W. 2001. Social Science Research Council, 1923–1998. New York: Social Science Research Council.
Wright Quincy. 1935. The Causes of War and the Conditions of Peace. New York: Longman.
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.