Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:31:04.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bargaining in Legislatures over Particularistic and Collective Goods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2007

CRAIG VOLDEN  and
ALAN E. WISEMAN
CRAIG VOLDEN
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
ALAN E. WISEMAN
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We develop a bargaining model in which a legislature divides a budget among particularistic and collective goods. By incorporating both private and public goods in a unified model, we uncover nonmonotonic relationships between legislative preferences for collective spending and the amount of the budget actually allocated to collective goods. Put simply, policy proposers can exploit coalition partners' strong preferences for public goods to actually provide fewer public goods in equilibrium while directing more private goods to themselves. These results explain why policy reforms to limit special interest spending often fail. This unified model also sheds new light on when legislatures prefer open or closed amendment rules and when coalitions take different sizes and shapes.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 101 , Issue 1 , February 2007 , pp. 79 - 92
Copyright
© 2007 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansolabehere Stephen, James M. Snyder Jr., Aaron B. Strauss, and Michael M. Ting. 2005. “Voting Weights and Formateur Advantages in the Formation of Coalition Governments.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (July): 550– 63.Google Scholar
Arnold R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Collective Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Austen-Smith David, and Jeffrey Banks. 1988. “Elections, Coalitions, and Legislative Outcomes.” American Political Science Review 82 (June): 409– 22.Google Scholar
Axelrod Robert. 1970. Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.
Banks Jeffrey S., and John Duggan. 2000. “A Bargaining Model of Collective Choice.” American Political Science Review 94 (March): 73– 88.Google Scholar
Banks Jeffrey S., and John Duggan. 2005. “A General Bargaining Model of Legislative Policy-making.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (January): 49– 85.Google Scholar
Baron David P. 1991. “Majoritarian Incentives, Pork Barrel Programs, and Procedural Control.” American Journal of Political Science 35 (February): 57– 90.Google Scholar
Baron David P., and Daniel Diermeier. 2001. “Elections, Governments, and Parliaments in Proportional Representation Systems.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (August): 933– 67.Google Scholar
Baron David P., and John Ferejohn. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 83 (December): 1181– 1206.Google Scholar
Battaglini Marco, and Stephen Coate. 2005. “Inefficiency in Legis- lative Policy-Making: A Dynamic Analysis.” Unpublished Manuscript, Princeton University.
Black Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. London: Cambridge University Press.
Carrubba Clifford J., and Craig Volden. 2000. “Coalitional Politics and Logrolling in Legislative Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (April): 261– 77.Google Scholar
Crombez Christophe. 1996. “Minority Governments, Minimal Winning Coalitions and Surplus Majorities in Parliamentary Systems.” European Journal of Political Research 29 (January): 1– 29.Google Scholar
Downs Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Evans Diana. 1994. “Policy and Pork: The Use of Pork Barrel Projects to Build Policy Coalitions in the House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (November): 894– 917.Google Scholar
Evans Diana. 2004. Greasing the Wheels: Using Pork Barrel Projects to Build Majority Coalitions in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ferejohn John. 1986. “Logrolling in an Institutional Context: A Case Study of Food Stamp Legislation.” In Congress and Policy Change, ed. Gerald C. Wright Jr., Leroy N. Rieselbach, and Lawrence C. Dodd. New York: Agathon Press, Inc.
Huber Evelyne, and John D. Stephens. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jackson Matthew O., and Boaz Moselle. 2002. “Coalition and Party Formation in a Legislative Voting Game.” Journal of Economic Theory 103 (March): 49– 87.Google Scholar
Jacoby William G., and Saundra K. Schneider. 2001. “Variability in State Policy Priorities: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Politics 63 (May): 544– 68.Google Scholar
Kousser Thad. 2005. Term Limits and the Dismantling of State Legislative Professionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Krehbiel Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Leblanc William, James M. Snyder Jr., and Micky Tripathi. 2000. “Majority-Rule Bargaining and the Under Provision of Public Investment Goods.” Journal of Public Economics 75 (January): 21– 47.Google Scholar
Lee Frances E. 2000. “Senate Representation and Coalition Building in Distributive Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (March): 59– 72.Google Scholar
Lizerri Alessandro, and Nicola Persico. 2001. “The Provision of Public Goods under Alternative Electoral Incentives.” The American Economic Review 91 (March): 225– 39.Google Scholar
Mayhew David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mayhew David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations 1946–1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Primo David M. Forthcoming. “A Comment on Baron and Ferejohn (1989): The Open Rule Equilibrium and Coalition Formation.” Public Choice.
Riker William. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Volden Craig, and Clifford J. Carrubba. 2004. “The Formation of Oversized Coalitions in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (July): 521– 37.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.