No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 May 2021
One of the most readily apparent weaknesses in the field of medicolegal studies has been our inability to develop consistent and lexicographically defensible descriptive titles for the field itself. In this Article, Professor William J. Curran offers an analysis of the historical roots of the terminology which has been applied in this field over the years, an examination of current confused usage, and a proposal for reform.
This paper is based on materials in chapters of a forthcoming book on medicolegal relations by the author. Basic research was supported by a grant-inaid from the Commonwealth Fund of New York, N.Y. The paper will be published simultaneously in Europe in Medicine, Science and the Law, the official publication of the British Academy of Forensic Sciences.
1 Ackerkenecht, Early History of Legal Medicine, 11 Ciba Symposia 1286–1290 (1950)Google Scholar.
2 Indiana University, 1974-1975 University Bulletin 50 (1974).
3 Duncan, A., Heads of Lectures on Medical Jurisprudence, or Institutiones Medicinae Legalis (Edinburgh: Neill and Co., 1792)Google Scholar.
4 Zacchias P., Questiones Medico Legales (1621-1661).
5 Rush, B., Introductory Lectures Upon the Institutes and Practices of Medicine 363 (Philadelphia, 1811)Google Scholar.
6 Gray, J. C., The Nature and Sources ok Law 129 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1909)Google Scholar.
7 Memorandum of Evidence to the Royal Commission on Medical Education, 3 Medicine, Science and the Law 104-110 (1967).
8 Schwerd, Beründung zur Aenderung der Fachbezeichnung ‘Gerichtliche Medizin' in ‘Rechlsmedizin’, 65 Deutsche Zeitschrift Für Gerichtliche Medizin 61–67 (1969)Google Scholar.
9 Moritz, The Need of Forensic Pathology for Academic Sponsorship, 33 Archives of Pathology 382–386 (1942)Google Scholar.
10 Moritz, Scientific Medicolegal Investigation in the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum, 158 J.A.M.A. 243–244 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.