Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:48:04.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Short Reviews of Selected Books and Articles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

Jay Alexander Gold*
Affiliation:
New York University; Harvard University; College of Medicine, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center of The Pennsylvania State University; American Journal of Law & Medicine

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Medicolegal Reference Library
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics and Boston University 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Roemer, M., Social Medicine: The Advance of Organized Health Services in America 171 (1978)Google Scholar.

2 Id. at 218.

3 Id. at 558.

4 Id. at 550.

5 Roemer, Session XI: The Importance of Free Choice and Its Weight in Organization of Medical Care, 10 Isr. J. Med. Sci. 141 (1974)Google Scholar.

6 Roemer, supra note 1, at 424.

7 5 Bell J. Econ. 467 (1977).

8 Harris, Regulation and Internal Control in Hospitals, 55 Bull. N.Y. Acad. Med. 88, 94 (1979)Google Scholar.

9 Id. at 99.

10 Rosenblatt, Health Care Reform and Administrative Law: A Structural Approach, 88 Yale L.J. 243, 248 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Id. at 251 (emphasis in original).

12 Id. at 320, n.359.

13 Texas ACORN v. Texas Area 5 Health Systems Agency, Inc., No. S-76-102-CA (E.D. Texas Mar. 1, 1977).

14 559 F.2d 1019 (1977).

15 Id. at 1025, n.13.

16 Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S. 85, 87 n.4 (1968).

17 Letter from Representative Paul G. Rogers to Representative Jim Wright (March 11, 1977), reprinted in Brief for Defendant-Appellant, Exhibit B, Texas ACORN v. Texas Area 5 Health Systems Agency, Inc., 559 F.2d 1019 (1977) (quoted in Rosenblatt, supra note 10, at 320 n.359).

18 It must be admitted that this way of interpreting the intent of the law has a long history. According to the Talmud, once when several rabbis were disputing a point of law, a series of miracles seemed to support one of the interpretations. Finally, a voice from heaven said that the interpretation was correct. The other side, however, was not convinced. “Said R[abbi] Jeremiah:… the Torah ha[s] already been given at Mount Sinai; [so] we pay no attention to a Heavenly Voice ….” The Babylonian Talmud (I. Epstein ed.) (Nezikin II, Baba Mezia 59b) (1935).

19 See K. Davis, Discretionary Justice (1969).

20 Wing, Title VI and Health Facilities: Forms Without Substance, 30 Hastings L.J. 137, 190 (1978)Google Scholar.