Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:55:14.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selected Recent Court Decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2021

Joseph R. Zakhary ,
Allison Baker ,
Young M. Park ,
Rodi Alexiadis ,
Sonil Gehani ,
Cecilia E. Rutherford ,
Ori Katz ,
Patrick S. Sinclair ,
Elizabeth Heinrich  and
Michael Bryan Stuart
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Medicolegal Reference Library
Information
American Journal of Law & Medicine , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , 1998 , pp. 499 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics and Boston University 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 118 S. Ct. 2028 (1998).

2 See id. at 2032.

3 Id.

4 Id. at 2036.

5 Id. at 2033 (quoting Austin v. United States, 509 U.S. 602, 609-10 (1993)).

6 See id. at 2034.

7 See id.

8 Id.

9 See generally Jeremy R. Johnson, Note, Health Care Fraud: Closing the Gate After the Horse Has Already Escaped, (1998) (unpublished student Note) (on file with the AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE).

1 154 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 1998).

2 See id. at 1281.

3 See id. at 1282-83.

4 See id. at 1283.

5 See id. at 1281.

6 See 478 U.S. 804 (1986).

7 See id. at 814.

8 See id. at 810.

9 See id. at 813.

10 See Jairath, 146 F.3d at 1283.

11 See id.

12 See id. at 1284.

13 See id.

14 See id. n.10.

1 146 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir. 1998).

2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).

3 See Kottle, 146 F.3d at 1058-59.

4 See id. at 1058.

5 See id.

6 See id.

7 See id.

8 See id. at 1059.

9 See id.

10 See id. at 1059 n.3.

11 U.S. CONST, amend. I.

12 Kottle, 146 F.3dat 1059.

13 See Eastern R.R. Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127, 137-38 (1961).

14 See United Mine Workers v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 357, 669-70 (1965).

15 Noerr Motor Freight, 365 U.S. at 144.

16 See City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advert., Inc., 499 U.S. 365, 380 (1991).

17 See Kottle, 146 F.3d at 1060-61.

18 Id. at 1062.

19 See id.

20 See id. at 1062-63.

21 Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Bd. of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1083 (9th Cir. 1976).

22 See Kottle, 146 F.3d at 1063-64.

1 146 F.3d 1149 (9th Cir. 1998).

2 See id. at 1159.

3 See id. at 1162.

4 See id. at 1165.

5 See id. at 1150-52.

6 See id. at 1159.

7 See id. at 1156.

8 See id. at 1156-57.

9 See id. at 1157.

10 See id. at 1158.

11 See id.

12 See id.

13 See id. at 1162.

14 See id.

15 See id.

16 See id.

17 See id. at 1163.

18 See id. at 1164.

19 See id. at 1164-65.

20 See id. at 1165.

21 See id.

22 See Lee, Theodora R., Privacy Issues in the Workplace, 558 PLI/LITIG. 411, 442-48 (1996).Google Scholar

23 See id.

1 148 F.3d 1042 (8th Cir. 1998).

2 See 29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169 (1998).

3 See Beverly, 148 F.3d at 1045.

4 See id.

5 See id.

6 See id.

7 See id.

8 See id.

9 See id.

10 See id.

11 See id.

12 See id.

13 See id.

14 See id.

15 See id.

16 29 U.S.C. § 152(3) (1998).

17 See Beverly, 148 F.3d at 1045 (citing Waverly-Cedar Falls Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. NLRB, 933 F.2d 626, 629 (8th Cir. 1991)).

18 29 U.S.C. § 152(11).

19 See Beverly, 148 F.3d at 1045 (citing Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. NLRB, 961 F.2d 700, 703 (8th Cir. 1992)).

20 See id.

21 Id.

22 See Beverly, 148 F.3d at 1045 (“[t]he National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) biased mishandling of cases involving supervisors increasingly has called into question our obeisance to the [NLRB] decisions in this area” (quoting Spentonbush/Red Star Co. v. NLRB, 106 F.3d 484, 492 (2d Cir. 1997))).

23 See id. at 1046.

24 See id.

25 See id.

26 See id.

27 See id.

28 See id.

29 See id.

30 See id. at 1047.

31 Id. at 1046.

32 See id.

33 Id. at 1047.

1 No. 98-00357, 1998 WL 661343 (D. Haw. Sept. 23, 1998).

2 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd (1998). This is a subsection of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985. Pub. L. No. 99-272, 100 Stat. 82 (1986).

3 See Arrington, 1998 WL 661343, at *4.

4 See id. at *3.

5 See id. at *4.

6 See id.

7 See id. at *5.

8 See id. at *1.

9 See id. at *2.

10 See id. at *5.

11 See id. at *3.

12 See id.

13 See id. at *4.

14 See id. at *2.

15 See id.

16 See id. at *5.

17 See id.

1 13 F. Supp. 2d 51 (D.D.C. 1998).

2 See Central Hudson Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of New York, 447 U.S. 557 (1980).

3 Friedman, 13 F. Supp. 2d at 54.

4 Id.

5 See id. at 57-58.

6 See id. at 59-60; see also Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp., 463 U.S. 60, 66-67 (1983) (holding that the relevant factors are: (1) whether the speech is concededly an advertisement; (2) whether the speech refers to a specific product; and (3) whether the speaker has an economic motivation for disseminating the speech).

7 See Friedman, 13 F. Supp. 2d at 64.

8 See id.

9 See id.

10 See id.

11 The Central Hudson analysis asks: (1) whether the speech is inherently misleading; (2) whether the government's interest is substantial; (3) whether the commercial speech restrictions advance the government's interest in a direct and material way; and (4) whether the restriction unduly burdens substantially more speech than necessary. See Central Hudson Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of New York, 447 U.S. 557, 566 (1980).

12 See Friedman, 13 F. Supp. 2d at 66 (noting that to end the Central Hudson analysis on the first prong, the speech must be inherently misleading, meaning more likely to deceive the public than to inform it).

13 Id. at 67.

14 See id. at 68-69.

15 See id. at 69.

16 See id.

17 Id. at 72.

18 See id.

19 Id. at 73.

20 See id.

21 See id.

1 Nos. 83677, 83886, 1998 WL 671770 (Ill. Oct. 1, 1998).

2 See id. at *5.

3 See id. at *1.

4 See id. at *2. The court does not distinguish between contact with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). HIV causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. The court makes clear that a cause of action is allowed for fear of contact with either. See id.

5 See id. at *3.

6 See id.

7 Id. at *4.

8 See id.

9 See id. at *7.

10 See id.

11 See id. at *8.

12 See id.

13 See id. at *9.

14 See id.

15 See, e.g., Bain v. Wells, 936 S.W.2d 618 (Tenn. 1997); Williamson v. Waldman, 696 A.2d 14 (N.J. 1997).

1 No. 97-2422, 1998 WL 671682 (Ill. App. Ct. Sept. 30, 1998).

2 156 Ill.2d 511,525 (1993).

3 See James, 1998 WL 671862, at *1.

4 See id. at *2.

5 Id.

6 See id. at *4.

7 See id. at *3.

8 See id.

9 See id. at *4 (citing Baptist Mem'l Hosp. Sys. v. Sampson, 969 S.W.2d 945 (Tex. 1998)).

10 See id. at *5.

11 See id. at *6.

1 960 P.2d 486 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998).

2 WASH. REV. CODE ANN. § 7.72.010(1) (West 1997).

3 See McKenna, 960 P.2d at 487.

4 See id. at 487-88.

5 See id.

6 See id.

7 Id. at 487.

8 See id.

9 See id.

10 See id. at 486.

11 See id. at 488.

12 See id. at 487.

13 WASH. REV. CODE ANN. § 7.72.010(1) (1997).

14 Id. § 7.72.010(1)(b).

15 See McKenna, 960 P.2d at 487.

16 See id. at 488.

17 See id. (citing Howell v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood Bank, 785 P.2d 815 (Wash. 1990); Gile v. Kennewick Pub. Hosp. Dist., 296 P.2d 662 (Wash. 1956)).

18 See id.