Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T03:00:51.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ERISA: Supreme Court Holds ERISA Does Not Preempt Illinois Independent Review Law—Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2021

Christine Flood
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Developments in Health Law
Information
American Journal of Law & Medicine , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 507 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics and Boston University 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 122 S. Ct. 2151 (2002).

2 Employee Retirement Income and Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (2000).

3 Illinois Health Maintenance Organization Act, 215 ILL. COMP. STAT. ANN. 125/4-10 (2000).

4 See Befort, Stephen F. & Kopka, Christopher J., The Sounds of Silence: The Libertarian Ethos of ERISA Preemption, 52 FLA. L. REV. 1, 36 (2000)Google Scholar.

5 Id.

6 Section 514(a) provides that ERISA “shall supercede any and all State laws insofar as they … relate to any employee benefit plan” covered by the statute. 29 U.S.C. § 1144(a).

7 Moran, 122 S. Ct. at 2158.

8 215 ILL. COMP. STAT. ANN. 125/4-10.

9 Moran, 122 S. Ct. at 2156.

10 Id. at 2156-57.

11 Id. at 2159.

12 Id.

13 Id.

14 Id.

15 Id.

16 15 U.S.C. §§ 1011-1015 (2000).

17 Moran, 122 S. Ct. at 2159-61.

18 Id.

19 Id. at 2159.

20 Id. at 2160-61.

21 Id.

22 Id.

23 Id. at 2162.

24 Id. at 2163.

25 Id. at 2162.

26 Id. at 2163-64.

27 29 U.S.C. § 1144(b)(2)(A).

28 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a).

29 Moran, 122 S. Ct. at 2162.

30 Id.

31 See id. at 2165-67 (discussing Rush's reliance on Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Taylor, 481 U.S. 41 (1987)).

32 Id.

33 Id. at 2167-69.

34 Id.

35 Id.

36 Id.

37 Bipartisan Patient Protection Act, S. 1052, 107th Cong. (2001); Bipartisan Patient Protection Act, H.R. 2563, 107th Cong. (2001).

38 See generally, Mariner, Wendy K., State Regulation of Managed Care and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 335 NEW ENG. J. MED. 1986 (1996)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed (discussing ERISA's lack of substantive regulation and obstruction of certain state regulation).

39 Linda Greenhouse, Court, 5-4, Upholds Authority of States to Protect Patients, N.Y. TIMES, June 21, 2002, at A1.

40 Id.

41 Id.

42 Moran, 122 S. Ct. at 2162.