No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 January 2021
1 296 F. Supp. 2d 20 (D. Mass. 2003) [hereinafter UMass Medical].
2 42 U.S.C. § 1395(ii) (2000).
3 UMass Medical, 296 F. Supp. 2d at 24.
4 42 U.S.C. § 405(h).
5 Id. § 405(h).
6 UMass Medical, 296 F. Supp. 2d at 24.
7 Id. at 25.
8 422 U.S. 749, 757-58 (1975).
9 Id.
10 81 F. Supp. 2d 1033, 1049 (D. Idaho 1999).
11 Id. The court noted that although Idaho Falls interpreted section 405(h) to bar consideration of the defendant's rather than the plaintiff's claim, “it applied the provision in the same context as presented here.” UMass Medical, 296 F. Supp. 2d at 25.
12 UMass Medical, 296 F. Supp. 2d at 26.
13 Id. at 27.
14 Id. at 28.
15 Id.
16 Id.
1 No. 2002-271, 2004 WL 226055 (Vt. Feb. 6, 2004).
2 Id. at ¶ 14. \
3 Id. at ¶ 8.
4 Id.
5 Id.
6 Id. at ¶ 11 (citing VT. STAT. ANN. tit. 8, §§ 4089a(b)(4)-(5) (1989)).
7 Id. at ¶ 12 (citing VT. STAT. ANN. tit. 8, § 4089a(c) (1989)).
8 Id. (citing VT. CODE R. 95-2, §§ 7B(1), (6) (2000)).
9 Id. at ¶ 13.
10 Id. at ¶ 14.
11 Id.
12 Id. at ¶ 14.
13 Id. at ¶ 23.