Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:37:44.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WTO Decision Striking Down U. S. Revenue Act of 1916

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2017

Sean D. Murphy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 95 , Issue 1 , January 2001 , pp. 147 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Revenue Act of 1916, 15 U.S.C. §§71-77 (1994).

2 For recent cases, see Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Mitsui Co., 35 F.Supp.2d (S.D.Ohio 1999); Geneva Steel Co. v. Ranger Steel Supply Corp., 980 F. Supp. 1209 (D. Utah 1997); Helmac Products Corp. v. Roth (Plastics) Corp., 814 F. Supp. 581 (E.D.Mich. 1993).

3 19 U.S.C. §§1671-1677n (1994 & Supp. IV 1998).

4 19 C.F.R. §§351.101-356.30 (1999).

5 19 C.F.R. §§201.0-210.79 (1999).

6 United States—Anti-Dumping Act of 1916 (Complaint by the European Communities), WTO Doc. WT/DS136/R (Mar. 31, 2000) [hereinafter Panel report]; United States—Anti-Dumping Act of 1916 (Complaint by Japan), WTO Doc. WT/DS162/R (May 29, 2000). The two panels comprised the same three panelists. Albeit not identical, the reports are alike in all major respects.

7 See Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1A, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts 168 (1994).

8 See Panel report, supra note 6, para. 6.82.

9 See id., para. 3.86.

10 United States—Anti-Dumping Act of 1916, WTO Doc. WT/DS136/AB/R-WT/DS162/AB/R, paras. 90-91 (Aug. 28, 2000) (footnotes omitted) [hereinafter Appellate Body report].

11 See Panel report, supra note 6, para. 6.168 (citing EC—Anti-Dumping Duties on Audio Tapes in Cassettes Originating in Japan, GATT Doc. ADP/136 (unadopted; Apr. 28, 1995)).

12 Appellate Body report, supra note 10, paras. 128, 130 (footnotes omitted).

13 USTR Press Release on WTO Appellate Body Upholds Panel Ruling Against U.S. Revenue Act of 1916, No. 00-59 (Aug. 28, 2000), obtainable from <http://www.ustr.gov>.