No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
1 Kenneth, W. Abbott, GATT as a Public Institution: The Uruguay Round and Beyond , 18 Brook. J. Int’l L. 31 (1992)Google Scholar.
2 For an explication of this point, see Joel, P. Trachtman, Trade and . .. Problems, Cost-Benefit Analysis and Subsidiarity , 9 Eur. J. Int’l L. 32 (1998)Google Scholar.
3 Baldwin cites Article 17.6(i), when most of the concern has been over 17.6(ii), providing that dispute resolution panels shall defer to multiple permissible interpretations of code provisions. See, e.g., Steven, P. Croley & John, H. Jackson, WTO Dispute Procedures: Standard of Review and Deference to National Governments , 90 AJIL 193, 200 n.32 (1996)Google Scholar.