Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:59:28.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

U.S. Position in ICJ Case on U.S. Execution of German Nationals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 95 , Issue 3 , July 2001 , pp. 650 - 655
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Apr. 24, 1963, 21 UST 77, 596 UNTS 261. The Court’s jurisdiction is based upon the Convention’s Optional Protocol, to which both the United States and Germany are parties. See Optional Protocol to the Convention on Consular Relations Concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes, Apr. 24, 1963, 21 UST 325, 596 UNTS 487. For background on this case, including the Court’s decision on interim measures of protection, see Murphy, Sean D., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 93 AJIL 644 (1999)Google Scholar, and Aceves, William J., Case Report: Case Concerning the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Federal Republic of Germany v. United States) [LaGrand case], 93 AJIL 924 (1999)Google Scholar.

2 LaGrand (Ger. v. U.S.), Provisional Measures, 1999 ICJ Pleadings (Mar. 3, 1999), reprinted in 38 ILM 308 (1999). The documents cited on LaGrand are available online at <http://www.icj-cij.org>.

3 Verbatim Record, LaGrand (Ger. v. U.S.), ICJ Doc. CR 2000/30 (Nov. 16, 2000).

4 Verbatim Record, LaGrand (Ger. v. U.S.), ICJ Doc. CR 2000/28, paras. 1.15-1.17 (Nov. 14, 2000).

5 Id., paras. 2.7-2.8, 2.10.

6 Id., paras. 2.6, 2.12-2.13.

7 Id., paras. 2.34-2.35

8 Id., para. 2.53.

9 Verbatim Record, LaGrand (Ger. v. U.S.), ICJ Doc. CR 2000/29, at para. 7.2 (Nov. 14, 2000).

10 Id., paras. 7.16-7.23.

11 Id., paras. 7.4-7.15 (footnotes omitted).

12 Id., para. 5.23.

13 Id., para. 5.27.

14 LaGrand (Ger. v. U.S.) (Int’l Ct. Justice June 27, 2001).

15 Id., para. 128(7).

16 See Bonner, Raymond, Mexican Killer Is Refused Clemency by Oklahoma, N.Y. Times, July 21, 2001, at A7 Google Scholar (nearly half of the foreign nationals on death rows are Mexican); Simons, Marlise, Berlin Wins Consular Case Against U.S. in UN. Court, N.Y. Times, June 28, 2001, at A8 (four Germans are on death rows)Google Scholar.