Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:58:06.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

U.S. Legislation in Support of Diamond Controls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

9 See, e.g., L, John. Hirsch, , Sierra Leone: Diamonds and the Struggle for Democracy (2001)Google Scholar; Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars (Mats Berdal & David M. Malone eds., 2000).

10 For Angola, see SC Res. 1173 (June 12, 1998); SC Res. 1176 (June 24, 1998). For Sierra Leone, see SC Res. 1306 (July 5, 2000); SC Res. 1343 (Mar. 7, 2001).

11 See Global Witness, A Rough Trade (1998).

12 The first meeting of this process was held in Kimberley, South Africa, in May 2000 at the initiative of African diamond-producing states. The UN General Assembly has endorsed the work of the Kimberley Process. See GA Res. 55/56 (Dec. 1, 2000).

13 See Essential Elements of an International Scheme of Certification for Rough Diamonds, Kimberley Process Working Doc. 1/2002 (Mar. 20, 2002). The document is available online at <http://partnershipafricacanada.org>. Nonmembers may access some Kimberley Process documents, but not this particular one, at <http://www.kimberleyprocess.com>. It is anticipated that the Kimberley scheme will be approved by the United Nations.

14 H.R. 2722, 107th Cong. (2001).

15 See S. 787, 107th Cong. (2001); S. 1084, 107th Cong. (2001).