No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
U.S. District Court Refuses Enforcement of Nicaraguan Judgment, Finding Absence of International Due Process
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2010
References
1 Osorio v. Dole Food Co., No. 07–22693, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 99981 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 20,2009); see Edvard, Pettersson, Dole Doesn’t Have to Pay Nicaraguan Verdict, U.S. Judge Rules (Oct. 21, 2009)Google Scholar, at http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=a5nlMjavvtrM.
2 Osorio v. Dole Food Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 99981, at *13–14.
3 Id. at *15 (citation omitted).
4 Id. at *28.
5 Fla. Stat. §§55.601–55.607 (2009).
6 Osorio v. Dole Food Co., No. 07–22693–CIV, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 713 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2009).
7 Osorio v. Dole Food Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 99981, at *6.
8 Id.at *11.
9 Id. at *42–50.
10 Id. at *63 (“It appears, therefore, that the majority of plaintiffs who recovered in this case suffered from injuries for which, according to the unrefuted medical testimony presented to the Court, there is no medical evidence that DBCP is capable of causing.”).
11 Id. at*56.
12 Id. at *77 (citation omitted).
13 Id. at*78–99.
14 Id. at *106 (citation omitted).
15 Id. at *114–15.