Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T11:47:07.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The United States and the United Nations Treaty on Racial Discrimination. A Report for the Panel on International Human Rights Law and Its Implementation. By Nathaniel L. Nathanson and Egon Schwelb. ASIL Studies in Transnational Legal Policy No. 9. (St. Paul: West Publishing Co., 1975. Pp. vii, 94. $3.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

C. Clyde Ferguson Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Briefer Notices
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , July 1976 , pp. 610 - 611
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The substance of the argumentation made to the White House urging the necessity of a U.S. signature to the Race Convention appears in Ferguson, , United Nations Convention Against Racial Discrimination: Civil Rights by Treaty, 1 Law in Transition 61 (1964)Google Scholar.

2 See, e.g., Remarks, Sen. Bricker (Rep. Ohio):

There are two reasons, Mr. Chairman, why Senate Joint Resolution has attracted such widespread support. The American people want to make certain that no treaty or executive agreement will be effective to deny or abridge their fundamental rights. Also, they do not want their basic rights to be supervised or controlled by international agencies over which they have no control.

Hearings on S.J.I and 43 Before the Subcomm. of the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, 83d. Cong., 1st Sess., 1 et seq. (1953).

3 217 P.2d. 481 (Cal. Dist. Ct. App. 1950), aff’d. other grounds 38 Cal. 2d 718, 242 P.2d 617 (Cal. 1952).

4 Regarding UN Covenants on Human Rights, see, e.g., Ferguson, , United Nations Human Rights Covenants: Problems of Ratification and Implementation, 62 ASIL Proc. 83 (1968).Google Scholar