Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:46:34.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United Bank Limited v. Cosmic International, Inc.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Alona E. Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

Jurisdictionact of state doctrineexpropriation without compensation
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , April 1977 , pp. 351 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © The American Society of International Law 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A digest of the award in Anaconda Company and Chile Copper Company v. Overseas Private Investment Corporation, Case No. 16 10 0071 72 (July 17, 1975) appears in 70 AJIL 135 (1976). The full text has been reprinted in 14 ILM 1210 (1975).

1 Quoting Menendez v. Saks and Co., 485 F.2d 1355, 1364 (2d Cir. 1973), rev’d on other grounds sub nom. Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, 96 S.Ct. 1854 (1976); 68 AJIL 325 (1974), 70 AJIL 828 (1976)). Footnotes by court omitted.

2 542 F.2d 868, 874.

3 Id. 876.

Id. 877, citing Republic of Iraq v. First National City Bank, 353 F.2d 47, 52 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. den. 382 U.S. 1027 (1966); 60 AJIL 592 (1966).