Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:05:38.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

UN Security Council Reform and the Right of Veto: A Constitutional Perspective. (Legal Aspects of International Organization, Vol. 32.) By Bardo Fassbender. The Hague, London, Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1998. Pp. xii, 395. Index. Fl 185; $100; £63.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2017

Frederic L. Kirgis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 93 , Issue 4 , October 1999 , pp. 975 - 977
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 He goes on to say that not all international law has constitutional character and rank.

2 Quoting UN Charter pmbl.

3 Fassbender quotes the British proposal in footnote 576 on pages 332–33. Its key provision says, in substance, that a dispute arises whenever a state bringing a matter before the Council alleges that another state is in the process of breaching an international obligation or endangering international peace and security, and the other state contests the allegation. See UN GAOR, 3d Sess., Supp. No. 10, at 1, 8, UN Doc. A/578 (1948).