Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:21:31.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Treatment of U.S. Detainees at Guantánamo Bay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 99 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 261 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 124 S.Ct. 2633 (June 28, 2004); see Jenny, S. Martinez, Case Report: Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 98 AJIL 782 (2004)Google Scholar.

2 Rasul v. Bush, 124 S.Ct. 2686 (June 28, 2004); see David, L. Sloss, Case Report: Rasul v. Bush, 98 AJIL 788 (2004)Google Scholar.

3 See Memorandum from Wolfowitz, Paul, Deputy Secretary of Defense, to the Secretary of the Navy (July 7, 2004), at <http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul2004/d20040707review.pdf>..>Google Scholar

4 In early December, during U.S. district court proceedings challenging detentions at Guantánamo Bay, the principal deputy associate attorney general reportedly contended that Combatant Status Review Panels could consider evidence obtained through the use of torture if the panel found it to be “reliable.” Evidence Gained by Torture Allowed, Wash. Post, Dec. 3, 2004, at A4 Google Scholar.

5 Neil, A. Lewis, Guantánamo Prisoners Getting Their Day, but Hardly in Court, N.Y. Times, NOV. 8, 2004, at Al Google Scholar; Leonnig, Julie Tate, Detainee Hearings Bring New Details and Disputes, Wash. Post, Dec. 11, 2004, at Al Google Scholar; Guantanamo Review to Free Second Man, Wash. Post, Dec. 21, 2004, at A22 Google Scholar.

6 Agora: Military Commissions, 96 AJIL 320 (2002)Google Scholar.

7 See Indictment (n.d.), United States v. Hamdan (U.S. Mil. Comm’n), at <http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul2004/d20040714hcc.pdf>; Tribunals Begin, Closely Watched, Int’l Herald Trib., Aug. 25, 2004, at 4 Google Scholar.

8 Mintz, John, Presiding Officer at Guantanamo Faces Questions, Wash. Post, Sept. 16, 2004, at A3 Google Scholar; Neil, A. Lewis, Guantánamo Tribunal Process in Turmoil, N.Y. Times, Sept. 26, 2004, at A14 Google Scholar.

9 Neil, A. Lewis, General Takes Three Officers off Tribunal at Cuba Base, N.Y. Times, Oct. 22, 2004, at A20 Google Scholar.

10 Carol, D. Leonning, U.S. Loses Ruling on Monitoring of Detainees, Wash. Post, Oct. 21, 2004, at A4 Google Scholar.

11 Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, Civ. Action No. 04-1519 (JR), mem. op., order (Nov.8, 2004), at <http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/district-court-2004.html>.

12 See Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Aug. 12, 1949, Art. 5, 6 UST 3316, 75UNTS 135.

13 D, Carol. Leonnig Justkes Asked to Rule on Detainees, Wash. Post, Nov. 24, 2004, at A4 Google Scholar.

14 Eggen, Dan, Ashcroft Decries Court Rulings, Wash. Post, Nov. 13, 2004, at A6 Google Scholar.