Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:51:01.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State Jurisdiction and Immunities: U.S. Supreme Court Finds Iran Immune in Case Involving Terrorism Claims and the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 103 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 581 - 582
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ministry of Def. and Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Elahi, 129 S.Ct. 1732 (2009).

2 Elahi v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 124 F.Supp.2d 97, 103 (D.D.C. 2000).

3 Ministry of Def. and Support for Armed Forces of Islamic Republic of Iran v. Cubic Defense Systems, Inc., 236 F.Supp.2d 1140 (S.D. Cal. 2002).

28 U.S.C. §§1602-1611 (2000 & Supp. Ill 2003).

5 Ministry of Def. and Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Cubic Defense Systems, 385 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2004).

6 Ministry of Defense and Support for Armed Forces of Islamic Republic of Iran v. Elahi, 546 U.S. 450 (2006).

7 116 Stat. 2337, 28 U.S.C. §1610 note.

8 495 F.3d 1024 (2007).

9 Office of Foreign Assets Control, Department of Treasury, Payment to Persons Who Hold Certain Judgments Against Cuba or Iran, 68 Fed. Reg. 8,077, 8,081 (Feb. 19, 2003).

10 The Court unanimously held that the Cubic award was not blocked at the relevant time. Justice Kennedy, joined by Justices Souter and Ginsburg, dissented from the holding that Elahi had waived his right to attach.