No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2017
1 Matar v. Dichter, 563 F.3d 9 (2d Cir. 2009).
2 28 U.S.C. §1350 (2000).
3 28 U.S.C. §§1602-1611 (2000 & Supp. Ill 2003).
4 563F.3datll.
5 538F.3d71 (2d Cir. 2008).
6 Compare Belhas v. Ya’alon, 515 F.3d 1279, 1284-86 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (suggesting that defendant’s employment status at time a suit is brought is not controlling) with Yousuf v. Samantar, 552 F.3d 371, 381-83 (4th Cir. 2009) (relevant statutory language is FSIA is in present tense, so past officials not covered).
7 5 6 3 F . 3 d a t l 3 .
8 [Editors’s Note: The Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 116 (1812).]
9 563 F.3d at 14 (citation omitted).