Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-rnj55 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-15T08:00:25.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revising Our Nationality Laws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Philip C. Jessup
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 1934 , pp. 104 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1934

References

1 Department of State Press Releases, Feb. 20, 1932, Weekly Issue No. 125, p. 178.

2 260 U. S. 178.

3 261 U. S. 204.

4 (1929), 279 U. S. 644.

5 283 U. S. 605.

6 Quære whether the court could distinguish its earlier decisions on the basis of the unconvincing argument grounded on the Briand-Kellogg Pact as urged by the petitioner but rejected by the District Court in In re Beak (1933), 2 F. Supp. 899.

7 34 Stat. 596; and see, for example, United States v. Ness (1917), 245 U. S. 319; United States v. Sakharam Ganesh Pandit (1926), 15 F (2d), 285; Hazard, “Res Judicata in Naturalization Cases in the United States,” this journal, Vol. 23 (1929), p. 50.

8 28 Op. Atty. Gen. 504.

9 As followed by the courts in Miller v. Sinjen (1923), 289 Fed. 388, and Camardo v. Tillinghast (1929), 29 F (2d), 527

10 (1927), 274 U. S. 657.

11 Cf. United States (William Mackenzie) v. Germany, U. S.-Germany Mixed Claims. Commission (1926), Decisions and Opinions, p. 628; this journal, Vol. 20 (1926), p. 595.

12 Citizenship of the United States (1904), p. 49.

13 (1928), 24 P (2d), 316.