No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 June 2017
1 The case is reported in the lower courts in [1956] 1 All E. B. 229 and 2 All E. &. 487. It is noted in 50 A.J.I.L. 686 (1956) and 51 A.J.I.L. 128 (1957).
2 The decision in this case was that a certain partnership designed to run whiskey into the United States during prohibition was illegal.
3 This case involved a contract which was upheld despite the fact it involved a violation of a Portuguese law prohibiting the export of gold. The decision purportedly announced the “revenue” law exception to the general principle of non-enforceability.