Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T21:59:12.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Consequences of Economic Embargoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Monroe Leigh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The failure of the U.S.-led embargo against Haiti had become notorious long before the time President Clinton decided to invade Haiti in order to restore President Aristide to office. The embargo had failed to unseat the junta and it had worked enormous hardship on the poor people of Haiti—so much so that thousands were willing to risk their lives on the high seas in makeshift vessels to seek asylum in the United States. This comment deals not with the legalities of the President’s action—which seem clear enough in view of the Security Council resolutions—but, rather, with the political consequences of the economic embargo in Haiti as well as elsewhere.

Type
Agora: The 1994 U.S. Action in Haiti
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 89 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 74 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fruehauf Corp. v. Massardy, Ct. App. Paris, [1965] 2 Gazette du Palais 86, 5 ILM 476 (1966).

2 Compagnie Européenne des Pétroles v. Sensor Nederland B.V., Dist. Ct. The Hague, 1982 Rechtspraak van de Week 167, 22 ILM 66 (1983), summarized in 77 AJIL 636 (1983).

3 Economist, Nov. 20, 1982, at 20.