Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
1 Op. cit. 3.
2 Op. cit. 141.
3 Ibid. 140.
4 Op. cit., Art. 2, commentary, pp. 40 ff.
5 See Royce, Aerial Bombardment and the International Regulation of Warfare, Chs. I, IV (1928).
6 Op. cit. 137–138.
7 See the references in the present writer’s editorial comment, “Should International Law Recognize An Intermediate Status Between Peace and Wart?” 48 A. J. I. L. 98 (1954)Google Scholar, and “Intermediacy,” 23 Nordisk Tidsskrift for International Ret 16 (1953)Google ScholarPubMed.
8 For example, it cites at page 39 Kunz, , “The Laws of War,” 50 A.J.I.L. 331 (1956)Google Scholar, and Lauterpacht, , “The Problem of the Revision of the Law of War,” in 29 Brit. Tr. Bk. Int. Law 360–382 (1952)Google Scholar.
9 The rapporteur, in his Provisional Report, refers to the ICRC draft of 1955 and to Kunz’s article cited in the preceding note.
10 Kunz, , “The New U.S. Army Field Manual on the Law of Land Warfare,” 51 A.J.I.L. 388 (1957)Google Scholar.
11 ICRC, op. cit. 45; Institut, report, p. 9. The present writer shares this view: see A Modern Law of Nations, Ch. VIII (1946).
12 President Eisenhower’s Press Conference July 3, 1957, N.Y. Times, July 4, 1957.
13 Op. cit. 109.
14 Op. cit. 232.
15 Op. cit. 3.
16 Op. cit. 231.
17 ICRC, op. cit. 22.
18 Kissinger, op. cil. 230.
19 Cf. ibid. 232.
20 See the articles cited supra, note 7.