No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Oklahoma Court Finds Accused Was Prejudiced by Lack of Consular Notification in Death Penalty Case
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2017
Abstract
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55d38/55d3864bfc9b24df88c27e801d9cbdf055995e82" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005
References
1 Avena (Mex. v. U.S.) (Int’l Ct. Justice Mar. 31, 2004), 43 ILM 581 (2004)Google Scholar.
2 Murphy, Sean D., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 98 AJIL 581 (2004)Google ScholarPubMed.
3 Torres v. Oklahoma, No. PCD-04-442 (Okla. Crim. App. May 13, 2004) (on file with author).
4 Torres v. Oklahoma, No. PCD 2004-442 (Okla. Dist. Ct. Okla. County Mar. 18, 2005) (Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law After Evidentiary Hearing on Remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals).
5 Id., slip op. at 3 (on file with author).
6 [Editor’s Note: The court’s opinion described Victor Vribe as director of foreign litigation at the Mexican Ministry of Foreign Relations.]
7 Torres v. Oklahoma, No. PCD 2004-442, slip op. at 6–7 (citation and footnotes omitted).